Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

ANALISIS PENGATURAN SPACE TOURISM DALAM HUKUM TRANSPORTASI RUANG ANGKASA: ANALYSIS OF SPACE TOURISM REGULATIONS IN SPACE TRANSPORTATION LAW Chiquita Chairany; Fajriyah, Yusra; Ema Septaria; Rehulina
Journal Presumption of Law Vol 6 No 2 (2024): Volume 6 Nomor 2 Tahun 2024
Publisher : Universitas Majalengka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31949/jpl.v6i2.9533

Abstract

Kajian ini menganalisis pengaturan hukum mengenai space tourism dalam konteks transportasi ruang angkasa, dengan fokus pada Perundang-Undangan Nomor 16, Tahun 2002 dan Outer Space Treaty 1967. Metode penelitian menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif, dengan analisis terhadap berbagai bahan pustaka dan dokumen hukum. Pembahasan meliputi aspek pengaturan hukum mengenai space tourism dalam Perjanjian Ruang Angkasa 1967, Registration Agreement tahun 1975, dan peraturan-peraturan terkait dampak negatif pelaksanaan space tourism. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa upaya hukum telah menetapkan prinsip-prinsip kesetaraan akses, larangan klaim kedaulatan, penanganan senjata, serta perlindungan dan perlakuan terhadap astronot. Meskipun space tourism membuka peluang baru dalam industri wisata ruang angkasa, perhatian serius diberikan terhadap dampak negatif seperti risiko bagi partisipan dan potensi kerusakan lingkungan ruang angkasa. Berbagai peraturan telah diperkenalkan, termasuk persyaratan keselamatan dan perlindungan peserta dalam U.S. Regulation for Operators and Participants in Commercial Suborbital Flights, serta tanggung jawab terhadap kerugian dari aktivitas ruang angkasa yang diatur dalam konvensi tanggung jawab seperti Liability Convention. Negara-negara seperti Amerika Serikat, Inggris, dan Australia telah mengembangkan hukum nasional mereka untuk memastikan kewajiban dan pertanggungjawaban terhadap kerusakan yang disebabkan oleh aktivitas ruang angkasa.
Tantangan Hukum dan Keamanan dalam Mitigasi Sampah Luar Angkasa Tak Teridentifikasi: Ancaman bagi Misi Antariksa dan Keselamatan Astronaut Nurul Adzkia; Rahwa Wati, Linda; Erzavin Daveri; Ema Septaria; M. Ilham Adepio
Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): June
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/ijlj.v2i4.3911

Abstract

Unidentified space debris poses a significant threat to the sustainability of space exploration and the safety of astronauts. As the number of artificial objects in Earth's orbit increases, the risk of collisions and damage to operational satellites and spacecraft also grows. This study examines the legal and security challenges in mitigating unidentified space debris using a normative approach, analyzing key international treaties such as the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies (Outer Space Treaty 1967), the Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects 1972 (Liability Convention 1972), and the Agreement on the Rescue of Astronauts, the Return of Astronauts and the Return of Objects Launched into Outer Space 1967 (Rescue Agreement 1967). While these treaties establish a legal framework for space object responsibility, gaps remain in ownership attribution and enforcement mechanisms, particularly for unidentified debris. Additionally, limited monitoring technology hampers effective collision risk mitigation. To address these challenges, stronger international regulations, the development of more precise tracking technologies, and enhanced global cooperation in space debris removal efforts are essential to maintaining the safety and sustainability of future space missions.
Implementasi RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) Terhadap Indonesia Menurut Hukum Internasional Ano Dwi Wijaya; Dista Aulia; Naurah Qanitah Dzakirah; Ema Septaria; M. Ilham Adepio
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 02 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i02.1330

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis tentang implementasi Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership di indonesia menurut hukum internasional, mengetahui pengaturan RCEP menurut konvensi wina 1969 tentang perjanjian internasional. Dengan menggunakan jenis penelitian hukum normatif dan bersifat preskriptif analitis. Pendekatan yang digunakan menggunakan pendekatan ketentuan konvensi internasional dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa keikutsertaan Indonesia dalam perjanjian Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership berdampak pada ekspor RCEP dapat meningkatkan akses pasar bagi produk-produk Indonesia, mempecepat arus investasi asing langsung, dan memperkuat peran Indonesia dalam rantai pasok global. Namun, di sisi lain, persaingan dengan produk impor yang lebih murah serta ketimpangan daya saing Industri domestik. Peran konvensi wina 1969 memberikan kepastian hukum sebagai acuan untuk memastikan bahwa perjanjian RCEP tersebut sesuai dengan asas pacta sunt servanda dan itikad baik.
Analisis Yuridis Peristiwa Pagar Laut Ditinjau Dari Hukum Nasional Dan Hukum Laut Internasional Dendi Saputra; Deyan Ajian Putra; Indah Salsabilla Putri; Ema Septaria; M. Ilham Adepio
Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): April - Juni
Publisher : GLOBAL SCIENTS PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The sea fence phenomenon at Pantai Indah Kapuk 2 (PIK 2) raises legal issues related to reducing community access and adverse impacts on the environment. This research aims to conduct a further study of legal violations arising from the sea fence incident. This research was conducted by analyzing and systematizing the data and information obtained qualitatively. Data on legal violations due to the sea fence phenomenon were collected using the literature study method. The data collected was analyzed using normative legal methods with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of this study inform that the phenomenon of sea fencing violates various provisions of Indonesian laws and regulations. Furthermore, the sea fencing phenomenon is also identified as contradicting the principles of sustainable marine resource management and potentially violating the state’s obligation to protect and preserve the environment as per Article 192 of UNCLOS 1982.
Pelanggaran Asas Good Faith terhadap Perjanjian Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Oleh Korea Utara Syarifatul Fadhilah; Amanda Fathona Fadhila; Universitas Bengkulu; Ema Septaria; M. Ilham Adepio
Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Mei : Majelis : Jurnal Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/majelis.v2i2.634

Abstract

This research examines North Korea's violation of the principle of good faith under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and its legal consequences. The main issue addressed in this study is North Korea’s breach of the good faith principle within the framework of the NPT, which raises legal implications regarding its status and obligations as a party to the treaty. Although North Korea was formally bound by the NPT, it secretly developed a nuclear weapons program, demonstrating non-compliance with the fundamental principle of international treaty implementation. This issue was further exacerbated by its refusal to allow inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and its unilateral withdrawal from the NPT, which has sparked debate over the legitimacy and legality of such action.Using a normative juridical approach, this study analyzes North Korea’s clandestine development of nuclear weapons while still a member of the NPT, as well as the validity of its withdrawal from the treaty. The findings show that North Korea violated the principle of good faith through its secret nuclear program, refusal of IAEA inspections, and withdrawal that did not meet the requirements of Article X of the NPT. The withdrawal may be deemed invalid as it was conducted in bad faith and without fulfilling the treaty's formal provisions. The legal consequences include the continued applicability of obligations under the NPT and state responsibility for breaches of international law. Ideal forms of accountability include the cessation of the nuclear program, payment of reparations, guarantees of non-repetition, and renewed compliance with NPT provisions through verifiable denuclearization.