Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL HUKUM JURISDICTIE Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah
Trinh, Hien
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Blasphemy Laws and Their Implications for Religious Freedom and Expression: A Tri-Country Southeast Asian Perspective Situmeang, Ampuan; Rusdiana, Shelvi; Trinh, Hien; Agustianto, Agustianto; Tan, Winsherly
Jurnal Hukum Vol 40, No 1 (2024): Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Unissula

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jh.40.1.156-170

Abstract

Blasphemy laws, while deemed important by some in protecting religious beliefs and practices, can have implication of conflicts with human rights. Utilizing comparative legal research method, this research aims to analyze how blasphemy laws in Indonesia and Thailand affect freedom of expression and religion. Findings of this study highlight the interplay between blasphemy laws, freedom of expression, and freedom of religion. This study also highlights the existing legal norms within relevant positive laws in Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam, that have implication of conflicts with freedom of expression and freedom of religion. Indonesia presents the most complex conflict between these human rights, while Thailand, despite offering greater freedom of expression, normatively falls short in religious freedom due to its preferential treatment of Buddhism and its clergy. Vietnam has the least implication of conflicts, as it only governs the prohibition against profaning a religion, which is significantly different than what constitutes as blasphemy, and allowing little to no room for multi interpretation.
TRADEMARKS IN SUSTAINABLE FASHION: A Comparative Legal Analysis of Indonesia and Italy Situmeang, Ampuan; Alhakim, Abdurrakhman; Fitri, Winda; Trinh, Hien
Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Vol 14, No 2 (2023): Jurisdictie
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j.v14i2.24114

Abstract

Trademarks have played a significant role in safeguarding intellectual property within the fashion industry and have been instrumental in upholding the reputation of various companies, particularly those aspiring to adopt sustainability concepts. This research aims to delineate the legal challenges and potential solutions for protecting intellectual property rights related to trademarks and the integrity of claims for sustainability implementation in Indonesia, employing normative research methods and comparative analysis with Italy's legal framework. The analysis reveals several structural differences between Indonesia and Italy's trademark legal frameworks despite sharing similar objectives. Italy has already been able to foster the integrity of sustainable claims in the fashion industry through regulations from the European Union although no direct connection to trademarks exists. On the other hand, Indonesia has yet to regulate the integrity of sustainable claims in the fashion industry although it possesses a sufficient foundational framework that could be further developed through its connection to the communal intellectual property protection system. Secara tradisional, merek memiliki peran penting dalam melindungi kekayaan intelektual di dalam industri fesyen dan telah menjadi kunci dalam menjaga reputasi berbagai perusahaan, terutama yang berkeinginan menerapkan konsep keberlanjutan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguraikan tantangan hukum dan solusi potensial dalam melindungi hak kekayaan intelektual yang terkait dengan merek serta menjaga integritas klaim implementasi keberlanjutan di Indonesia, dengan menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dan analisis perbandingan dengan kerangka hukum Italia. Analisis ini mengungkapkan beberapa perbedaan struktural antara kerangka hukum merek di Indonesia dan Italia, meskipun memiliki tujuan yang serupa. Italia telah berhasil menggalang integritas klaim keberlanjutan di industri fesyen melalui regulasi dari Uni Eropa, meskipun tidak ada keterkaitan langsung dengan merek. Di sisi lain, Indonesia masih harus mengatur integritas klaim keberlanjutan di industri fesyen, meskipun memiliki landasan kerangka kerja yang memadai yang bisa lebih dikembangkan melalui keterhubungannya dengan sistem perlindungan kekayaan intelektual komunal.
Co-Authors Agustianto Agustianto, Agustianto Alhakim, Abdurrakhman Fitri, Winda Rusdiana, Shelvi Situmeang, Ampuan Tan, Winsherly