Naelufar, Rizqan
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

From Bean to Benefit: How Indonesian Intellectual Property (IP) Law Protects the Coffee Farmers in Indonesia? Waspiah, Waspiah; Niravita, Aprila; Naelufar, Rizqan; Putri, Nadiyah Meyliana; Eka Saputra, Dany
Jambe Law Journal Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Jambi University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/home.v7i2.443

Abstract

This study addresses the urgent question: How can legal protections for Geographical Indications (GIs) as a form of Intellectual Property (IP) enhance the welfare of coffee farmers in Temanggung, Indonesia? Coffee is a vital agricultural product in this region, yet farmers face challenges in maximizing its economic potential. The research positions itself within the framework of empirical legal studies, analyzing the interplay between legal protections and agricultural sustainability. The paper discusses the issue by first examining the current state of GI protection in Temanggung, identifying both obstacles faced by farmers and the government. Through qualitative analysis, the study evaluates effective strategies for implementing GI protections and their implications for farmer welfare. The main findings indicate that while there are significant challenges in enforcing GI protections, targeted strategies—such as regular training and outreach for farmers, improved marketing initiatives, and the establishment of local regulations—can substantially enhance their livelihoods. Moreover, the research highlights the importance of increasing awareness and knowledge among farmers to leverage GI protections effectively. Overall, this study contributes to the understanding of agricultural law's role in rural development, providing actionable insights for policymakers and stakeholders aiming to support Indonesia’s coffee farmers.
Analisis Kedudukan Pekerja Outsourcing: Kajian Terhadap Putusan MK Nomor 168/PUU-XXI/2023 Ardelia, Talita Adwa; Hibahtillah, Muhammad Alldo; Imon, Syarah Adilla; Ningrum, Galuh Prima; Damayanti, Ratih; Naelufar, Rizqan; Agung, Muhammad Fariz Nur; Aini, Ailia Nur
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 2, No 4 (2024): December
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14189254

Abstract

The decision of the Constitutional Court No. 168/PUU-XXI/2023 has a significant impact on the regulation of outsourced labor in Indonesia, especially in the protection of workers' rights. The abolition of Article 65 of the Labor Law created a legal vacuum that triggered uncertainty, particularly regarding the types of work that could be outsourced. This decision confirms that outsourcing is only allowed for non-major jobs to protect permanent workers from the risk of replacement. The main challenge lies in government supervision and the drafting of clear implementing regulations. This research emphasizes the importance of supervision, worker rights education, and social dialogue between the government, companies, and trade unions. These measures are expected to improve the protection of outsourced workers, create a fair and sustainable labor system, and support deeper labor reform.
Rejuvinasi Demokrasi Konstitusional Melalui Amendemen UUD 1945 Martitah, Martitah; Rahmayani, Chanidia Ari; Naelufar, Rizqan
MORALITY: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10 No 2 (2024): Morality : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas PGRI Palangkaraya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52947/morality.v10i2.758

Abstract

Rejuvinasi demokrasi konstitusional melalui amendemen UUD 1945 merupakan langkah strategis dalam memperkuat sistem pemerintahan di Indonesia. Artikel ini membahas pentingnya amendemen sebagai instrumen untuk menyesuaikan konstitusi dengan perkembangan zaman dan kebutuhan masyarakat. Penelitian ini menganalisis tiga aspek utama: (1) urgensi perubahan dalam konteks dinamika politik dan sosial, (2) proses dan tantangan dalam pelaksanaan amendemen, serta (3) dampak terhadap praktik demokrasi dan penguatan lembaga negara. Dengan pendekatan kualitatif, studi ini menggunakan data dari literatur, wawancara, dan analisis kebijakan. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa amendemen UUD 1945 dapat mendorong partisipasi publik yang lebih luas, meningkatkan akuntabilitas lembaga, dan menciptakan landasan hukum yang lebih kuat bagi demokrasi. Namun, tantangan dalam konsensus politik dan resistensi dari berbagai pihak perlu diatasi agar proses rejuvinasi ini dapat berlangsung efektif. Kesimpulannya, amendemen UUD 1945 merupakan langkah penting dalam revitalisasi demokrasi konstitusional di Indonesia, dengan potensi untuk membawa perubahan positif bagi kehidupan berbangsa dan bernegara
Abortion Laws in Indonesia and Islam: A Clash of Morality, Religion, and Rights Triandani, Salsabila; Windiahsari, Windiahsari; Masyhar, Ali; Niravita, Aprila; Naelufar, Rizqan
Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society Vol 3 No 2 (2024): July-December, 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abortion remains one of the most controversial legal and ethical issues, balancing between reproductive rights, religious doctrines, and state regulations. In Indonesia, abortion laws are primarily governed by the Health Law No. 36 of 2009 and the Criminal Code, which generally prohibit abortion except under specific circumstances, such as medical emergencies or rape-induced pregnancies. These legal restrictions reflect Indonesia’s socio-religious landscape, where Islamic principles significantly influence legislative frameworks. From an Islamic legal perspective, abortion is largely prohibited but with nuanced interpretations depending on the gestational stage and underlying reasons. Classical Islamic jurisprudence generally forbids abortion after ensoulment (believed to occur at 120 days of pregnancy), though some scholars permit it under limited circumstances, such as to preserve the mother’s life or in cases of severe fetal abnormalities. However, differences exist among Islamic schools of thought regarding permissibility before ensoulment, leading to diverse legal applications across Muslim-majority countries, including Indonesia. This study critically examines the intersection of Indonesian state law and Islamic law on abortion, highlighting their points of convergence and divergence. It explores how legal, religious, and ethical considerations shape abortion policies and the implications for women's reproductive rights. The paper also addresses ongoing debates over potential legal reforms, considering global human rights perspectives and the influence of Islamic jurisprudence in shaping reproductive health policies. By comparing these legal frameworks, this study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of abortion law in Indonesia within both secular and religious contexts.
Abortion Laws in Indonesia and Islam: A Clash of Morality, Religion, and Rights Triandani, Salsabila; Windiahsari, Windiahsari; Masyhar, Ali; Niravita, Aprila; Naelufar, Rizqan
Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): Law, Morality, and Identity in Muslim Societies: A Contemporary Legal Discourse
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ciils.v3i2.31407

Abstract

Abortion remains one of the most controversial legal and ethical issues, balancing between reproductive rights, religious doctrines, and state regulations. In Indonesia, abortion laws are primarily governed by the Health Law No. 36 of 2009 and the Criminal Code, which generally prohibit abortion except under specific circumstances, such as medical emergencies or rape-induced pregnancies. These legal restrictions reflect Indonesia’s socio-religious landscape, where Islamic principles significantly influence legislative frameworks. From an Islamic legal perspective, abortion is largely prohibited but with nuanced interpretations depending on the gestational stage and underlying reasons. Classical Islamic jurisprudence generally forbids abortion after ensoulment (believed to occur at 120 days of pregnancy), though some scholars permit it under limited circumstances, such as to preserve the mother’s life or in cases of severe fetal abnormalities. However, differences exist among Islamic schools of thought regarding permissibility before ensoulment, leading to diverse legal applications across Muslim-majority countries, including Indonesia. This study critically examines the intersection of Indonesian state law and Islamic law on abortion, highlighting their points of convergence and divergence. It explores how legal, religious, and ethical considerations shape abortion policies and the implications for women's reproductive rights. The paper also addresses ongoing debates over potential legal reforms, considering global human rights perspectives and the influence of Islamic jurisprudence in shaping reproductive health policies. By comparing these legal frameworks, this study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of abortion law in Indonesia within both secular and religious contexts.
Is the Separation of State Attorneys the Key to Legal Reform in State Administrative Courts? Sipahutar, Cornelius Samuel; Emha, Zidney Ilma Fazaada; Naelufar, Rizqan
Indonesian State Law Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Indonesian State Law Review, October 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/islrev.v7i2.18872

Abstract

The role of state attorneys in administrative justice has long been a topic of debate, particularly in the context of Indonesia’s State Administrative Court (PTUN). Currently, state attorneys serve as both legal representatives for the government and as the public prosecutor in administrative disputes. This dual function has raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest and inefficiencies in the judicial process. This research explores the concept of separating the roles of state attorneys in the PTUN as a potential bridge for legal reform, with the aim of improving impartiality, transparency, and efficiency in state administrative disputes. Using a normative juridical approach, the study examines the advantages and challenges of creating a clear distinction between the roles of government legal counsel and public prosecutors in administrative cases. The findings suggest that such a separation could reduce conflicts of interest, enhance fairness in the adjudication process, and promote a more balanced approach to administrative justice. However, the implementation of this reform faces practical challenges, such as institutional resistance and the need for legislative changes. The novelty of this research lies in its exploration of a structural reform within the Indonesian administrative justice system, offering a fresh perspective on improving the independence and credibility of state administrative courts. The urgency of this reform is emphasized by the growing need for a more transparent and efficient judicial system that can meet the demands of modern governance. This study contributes to the ongoing discourse on legal reform in Indonesia and provides recommendations for policymakers aiming to strengthen the administrative justice system.