Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Risalah : Jurnal Imu Syariah dan Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP)
Jessica Sandini
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Perkara No. 17/Pdt.G/2024: Penggunaan Asas Prejudicieel Geschil dalam Perkara PMH (Penyalahgunaan Data Pribadi) Andryawan; Simbolon, Ezra Zesika; Graciella Azzura Putri; Suni, Indri Elena; Jessica Sandini; Patricia Debby Julydya
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i2.3449

Abstract

Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (PMH) di Indonesia telah mengalami peningkatan yang signifikan dalam beberapa tahun terakhir, dengan fokus khusus pada penyalahgunaan data pribadi di era digital. Lebih dari 20% populasi Indonesia dilaporkan pernah mengalami penyalahgunaan data pribadi dalam berbagai bentuk. Meskipun telah dilakukan upaya regulasi melalui UU Perlindungan Data Pribadi (UU PDP), masih terdapat celah hukum yang dapat dimanfaatkan oleh pihak yang tidak bertanggung jawab. Masalah ini diperparah oleh lemahnya sistem keamanan siber, kurangnya kesadaran masyarakat, serta keterbatasan dalam penegakan hukum. Artikel ini mengkaji kompleksitas penyalahgunaan data pribadi dari perspektif hukum, teknologi, dan sosial. Tantangan utama yang diidentifikasi meliputi koordinasi antar lembaga, kesiapan infrastruktur digital, dan kebutuhan akan kebijakan perlindungan data yang selaras dengan standar internasional.
Legal Philosophy Perspectives on Abortion Regulation in Indonesia Yuwono Prianto; Hanivah Fitriyani; Jessica Sandini; Keiko Patricia Liwe
Al-Risalah VOLUME 26 NO 1, MAY (2026) (IN PRESS
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/al-risalah.vi.61831

Abstract

Abortion in Indonesia is a complex legal issue involving moral, religious, and human rights dimensions. Regulations in the Criminal Code, Health Law, and Government Regulation No. 61 of 2014 demonstrate tension between protecting the right to life of the fetus and respecting women's rights to bodily autonomy and reproductive health. This research analyzes abortion regulations from legal philosophy perspectives—natural law, legal positivism, and progressive law—and assesses the extent to which regulations reflect substantive justice. The method employed is normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and theoretical approaches. Research findings indicate that natural law emphasizes the fetus's right to life as a natural right, legal positivism focuses on the certainty of written rules, while progressive law encourages responsiveness to social needs, particularly protecting women from the risks of illegal abortion. The perspectives of major religions in Indonesia generally reject abortion, although positive law provides limited exceptions for medical emergencies and pregnancies resulting from rape. Abortion regulation in Indonesia faces a normative dilemma as the law tends to be repressive while social reality demands greater protection for women. Regulatory reform that is more humanistic and progressive is needed, emphasizing balance between protecting the fetus's right to life and fulfilling women's rights to achieve substantive justice in accordance with Pancasila legal ideals and the constitution.
Co-Authors Andryawan Graciella Azzura Putri Hanivah Fitriyani Keiko Patricia Liwe Patricia Debby Julydya Simbolon, Ezra Zesika Suni, Indri Elena Yuwono Prianto