Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JOURNAL EQUITABLE Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum
Santoso , Mulia Akbar
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
THE CRIMINALIZATION POLICY AGAINST PLAGIARISM IS LINKED TO LEGAL PROTECTION IN INDONESIA Dinata, Umar; Aksar, Aksar; Santoso , Mulia Akbar
JOURNAL EQUITABLE Vol 9 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : LPPM, Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37859/jeq.v9i2.7079

Abstract

Plagiarism is not only a violation of the law, but also a violation of Moral Rights, especially when the identity of the author is not mentioned intentionally in the quotation, which is a violation of moral rights. In the context of Copyright, respect for moral rights requires citations from other people's work to be accompanied by clear sources. Plagiarism is considered one of the greatest sins in academia because it threatens the authenticity of the work and scientific integrity. Copyright is usually violated if the material is done without permission from the exclusive rights owner, the purpose of this study is to examine and analyze related to the urgency of legal protection to the copyright owner of scientific works against plagiarism, and to analyze the ideal concept of criminalization policy against plagiarism of scientific work copyright owners in Indonesia in the future, This research method uses normative juridical research methods, the results of this study found that legal protection of copyright owners of scientific works against plagiarism is very important in maintaining academic and scientific integrity. Copyright provides comprehensive protection of the work, covering the economic and moral aspects of the creator. Criminal law reform needs to clarify the provisions governing plagiarism, including the explicit use of the term "plagiarism" in the Copyright Law, changing the type of offense to ordinary types of offenses to increase the effectiveness of law enforcement, and imposing strict criminal sanctions against plagiarism perpetrators.
Efforts to Improve the Quality of Handling Sharia Economic Disputes by Indonesian Religious Courts Saut Maruli Tua Manik; Raihana; Yuniarti, Rahmi; Santoso , Mulia Akbar; Wilianli Melati Jaya Putri; Dhea Rahman Putri
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 002 (2024): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5509

Abstract

The development of religious courts to address Sharia economic cases in Indonesia is considered a historic moment by many parties. However, efforts to improve the quality of resolving Sharia economic issues in religious courts have become increasingly important. This aims to enhance the trust of legal seekers, especially in Sharia economic disputes, towards dispute resolution through the alternative path faced through religious courts. The research was conducted using normative research methods and the analysis used was qualitative. The results show that religious courts in Indonesia have absolute jurisdiction in handling Sharia economic cases. Although the number of cases is increasing, the expansion of this authority challenges all elements of religious courts, including employees and judges. Despite the efforts of guidance carried out by the Supreme Court (Mahkamah Agung) in this case implemented by the Directorate General of Religious Courts, there are still several obstacles, such as the lack of harmony in laws related to Sharia economic matters. Then there are other factors influencing the quality of problem handling, namely the dualism of judicial institutions, namely Religious Courts as well as General Courts. The dualism of dispute resolution after the issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 93/PUU-X/2012 remains a barrier, so the public has not fully been able to trust religious courts in the context of handling Sharia economic problems. Submission to the Consumer Dispute Settlement Board (BPSK) and agreements in contracts to use General Courts as a forum for resolving Sharia economic disputes reflect distrust in religious courts. Therefore, concrete steps are needed to overcome these barriers and increase public trust in religious courts to resolve Sharia economic problems.
Co-Authors Aksar Aksar, Aksar Dhea Rahman Putri Dinata, Umar Rahmi Yuniarti Raihana Tua Manik, Saut Maruli Wilianli Melati Jaya Putri