Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.92
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Protection: Journal Of Land And Environmental Law Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik Ipso Jure
RAHMADINA, Adji Annisa
Unknown Affiliation
Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Ipso Jure

 1 
Non-Military Preventive Efforts In Handling Human Rights Violations Against Armed Violent Groups in Papua, Indonesia Mardiana; Rahmadina, Adji Annisa; Bone, Sholihin
Ipso Jure Vol. 1 No. 10 (2024): Ipso Jure - November
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/szrvyx47

Abstract

This research explores the non-military preventive approach as a solution to human rights violations committed by the Armed Violence Group (KKB) in Papua. Using normative juridical methods, this research examines human rights law regulations in Indonesia, literature studies, and analysis of Gus Dur's speeches and writings on the peaceful approach. The conflict in Papua, fueled by a history of discrimination, exploitation of natural resources, and centralized policies, has been exacerbated by an often ineffective military approach. Comprehensive solutions are needed to address the injustice, poverty and human rights violations experienced by Papuans. This research proposes a strategy based on inclusive dialog, local participation, and respect for Papuan identity. This approach is rooted in the principles of justice, equality and human values upheld by Gus Dur. In addition, efforts to empower the economy, education, and infrastructure development in favor of indigenous peoples are considered important for creating sustainable peace. The results show that conflict resolution in Papua requires not only security solutions, but also strategic steps that prioritize social welfare and human rights protection, thus strengthening national cohesion within the framework of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI).
Analysis of Industrial Design Rights Protection in Supreme Court of Indonesia Number 1865 K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2022 Based on The Principle of Novelty and The Principle of Good Faith in Law Number 31 of 2000 Mardiana; Rahmadina, Adji Annisa; Asufie, Khairunnisa Noor
Ipso Jure Vol. 2 No. 9 (2025)
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/ij.v2i9.36

Abstract

This study examines the Analysis of Industrial Design Rights Protection in the Supreme Court Decision No. 1865 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2022 as mandated by Law No. 31 of 2000 concerning Industrial Designs. The main issue discussed is the application of the principles of novelty and good faith in the legal protection of industrial designs, as well as how the court applies these principles in its judgment. The purpose of this research is to analyze the urgency of applying the principles of novelty and good faith to maintain a balance between the exclusive rights of design owners and the public interest, and to assess the consistency of the Supreme Court in upholding justice and legal certainty within the field of intellectual property rights. The research employs a normative (doctrinal) legal method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches based on the Supreme Court Decision No. 1865 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2022. The data consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, including legislation, academic literature, and relevant jurisprudence. The results show that novelty is an essential requirement for obtaining legal protection over industrial designs, while good faith serves as both a moral and juridical filter to prevent the misuse of rights by unqualified parties. The Supreme Court emphasized that legal protection is granted only if the design is genuinely new, aesthetically valuable, and registered with honesty and legitimate intention. The study concludes that the principles of novelty and good faith hold fundamental importance in Indonesia’s industrial design legal system. Both serve as the core foundation in determining the validity of registration and protection of industrial designs. The study recommends strengthening technical regulations and enhancing substantive examination by the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP) to ensure that industrial design protection becomes more effective, fair, and responsive to the growth of the creative industry.
Co-Authors Asufie, Khairunnisa Noor Bone, Sholihin Harmono, Harmono Khoirunissa, Alisha Fasya MARDIANA Mardiana Mardiana Rahman, Alip Sofwan Rizko Ramadoni