Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Novum : Jurnal Hukum J-CEKI
Bimantya, Deva Mahendra Caesar
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Dynamics of The Job Creation Law (Case Study of The Constitutional Court’s Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 on The Formal Test Against Law Number 11 Of 2020 on Job Creation) Bimantya, Deva Mahendra Caesar; Masnun, Muh. Ali
NOVUM : JURNAL HUKUM Vol. 11 No. 01 (2024): Novum : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.2674/novum.v2i2.54219

Abstract

Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation (hereinafter referred to as the Omnibus Law) was enacted and signed by the President on November 2, 2020. The Omnibus Law aims to reform regulations by simplifying the legal framework to address the lack of synchronization among various laws and regulations, as well as eliminating overlapping rules that are considered to hinder the government's objectives. Constitutional Court Decision Number: 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 on the Formal Review of the Job Creation Law, issued by the Constitutional Court on November 4, 2021, granted the petitioner's request for a formal review of the Omnibus Law. On December 30, 2022, the Government issued Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perppu) No. 2 of 2022 on Job Creation as a follow-up to Constitutional Court Decision Number: 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. The research conducted in this study is normative, analyzing the judges' considerations in Constitutional Court Decision Number: 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, with a focus on the ambiguity/difference in interpretation among the nine judges regarding Law No. 12 of 2011 and the fulfillment of the urgency element in Perppu No. 2 of 2022. The author adopts a legal and case-based approach and utilizes primary and secondary legal sources to analyze the issues. The author employs a prescriptive method of analysis. In the decision, the judges did not consider the substantive principles of legislation and found that the element of urgent necessity, which compelled the issuance of the Job Creation Perppu, was not fulfilled.
Peran Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat dalam Menindaklanjuti Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Threshold Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Bimantya, Deva Mahendra Caesar; Isharyanto, Isharyanto
J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Vol. 4 No. 6: Oktober 2025
Publisher : CV. ULIL ALBAB CORP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/jceki.v4i6.12276

Abstract

Peran Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR) dalam menindaklanjuti Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) terkait threshold pemilihan kepala daerah, khususnya Putusan MK Nomor 60/PUU-XXII/2024 yang menempatkan MK sebagai positive legislature. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual dan perundang-undangan untuk mengkaji relevansi, kewajiban, serta tantangan kelembagaan yang muncul dalam implementasi putusan MK. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa DPR memiliki kewajiban normatif untuk melakukan revisi legislasi sebagai tindak lanjut Putusan MK yang bersifat final and binding. Namun, ketiadaan mekanisme legislative follow-up mengakibatkan putusan berisiko hanya menjadi deklarasi yudisial tanpa daya implementatif, sehingga melemahkan prinsip supremasi konstitusi. Ketidakpatuhan DPR mencerminkan constitutional disobedience, menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum, dan memerlihatkan dominasi politik atas hukum. Artikel ini merekomendasikan perlunya revisi Undang-Undang Mahkamah Konstitusi, penguatan peran BPHN, serta pembentukan mekanisme khusus seperti Komite Tindak Lanjut Putusan MK untuk memastikan putusan dapat diimplementasikan secara tepat waktu, konsisten, dan selaras dengan prinsip negara hukum demokratis.
Co-Authors Isharyanto Isharyanto Masnun, Muh. Ali