Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Hak atas Akses yang Adil terhadap Pendidikan Tinggi: Analisis Berdasarkan Falsafah Pancasila Lubis, Rahmad; Purnama, Desi; Sulaiman, Heri
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 6 No 2: Oktober 2024 - Maret 2025
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v6i2.381

Abstract

This research aims to comprehensively analyze citizens’ right to equitable access to higher education in Indonesia based on Pancasila’s philosophy. Employing a normative legal research methodology, this study examines the issue through statute and conceptual approaches. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis techniques to describe and address the research problem in depth. The findings indicate that equitable access to higher education is a constitutional right of every Indonesian citizen guaranteed by Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. As an embodiment of the welfare state principle, the state is obliged to create a just, equitable, quality, and affordable higher education system for all levels of society. It requires affirmative regulations, innovative and equitable financing schemes, and a reliable quality assurance system. Higher education must be seen as a strategic instrument to break the cycle of structural poverty, enhance social mobility, and realize distributive justice by prioritizing the principle of social solidarity. Therefore, the projection towards free higher education, especially in state universities, is a strategic step that needs to be realized gradually and sustainably, supported by progressive tax system reform, increased allocation of education budgets, and optimization of alternative funding sources, as a form of progressive interpretation of Article 31 section (1) of the 1945 Constitution.
An Examination of Shura Principles in the National Legislation System Lubis, Rahmad; Nugraha, Iqbal Subhan; Mutakin, Ali; Nuranisah, Nuranisah; Sulaiman, Heri
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the application of the shura principle, a concept of deliberation, as one of the key foundations in Islamic governance, within the context of Indonesia's national legislative system. Using a qualitative-descriptive approach, this study aims to analyze the extent to which shura values can be integrated into the process of forming democratic and just laws and regulations. Data were collected through literature studies of Islamic legal sources, legislative documents, and relevant previous research results. The study's results demonstrate that the principle of shura aligns significantly with the principles underlying the formation of national laws and regulations, including those of openness, public participation, and social justice. In addition, the integration of shura principles can strengthen moral and ethical legitimacy in the legislation process, so that it is expected to produce legal products that are more aspirational and in accordance with plural Indonesian values. These findings suggest the need to strengthen the deliberative mechanism at various stages of legislation, including formulation, discussion, and evaluation of laws and regulations, to achieve a more inclusive and interest-oriented legislative system.
HAK ATAS MENDAPATKAN KEHIDUPAN YANG BERKEADILAN: ANALISIS FALSAFAH PANCASILA SILA KE LIMA: Hak atas Mendapatkan Kehidupan yang Berkeadilan: Analisis Falsafah Pancasila Sila Ke Lima Sulaiman, Heri; Purnama, Desi; Durin, Ramzi
Dame Journal of Law Vol 1 No 1 (2025): DJL
Publisher : Yapilin Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64344/djl.v1i1.5

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas persoalan hukum pidana dalam menangani kejahatan siber yang semakin kompleks di era digital. Penulis menyoroti kelemahan pendekatan hukum pidana konvensional yang cenderung bersifat represif dan tidak memberikan ruang bagi pemulihan korban maupun pelaku. Pendekatan keadilan restoratif dipertimbangkan sebagai alternatif solutif dalam merekonstruksi kebijakan hukum pidana, dengan menekankan pada pemulihan hubungan sosial, tanggung jawab pelaku, dan partisipasi aktif semua pihak yang terdampak. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif yuridis-normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual dan perundang-undangan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan keadilan restoratif dalam penanggulangan kejahatan siber memerlukan pembaruan kebijakan hukum pidana yang tidak hanya berbasis pada penjeraan, tetapi juga memperhatikan nilai-nilai keadilan, rekonsiliasi, dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan reformasi hukum yang komprehensif dan berkelanjutan guna menyesuaikan hukum pidana nasional dengan dinamika kejahatan di era digital.
Teori Keadilan John Rawls dan Relevansinya dalam Formulasi Kebijakan Pembagian Harta Bersama di Era Kontemporer: Teori Keadilan John Rawls dan Relevansinya dalam Formulasi Kebijakan Pembagian Harta Bersama di Era Kontemporer Sulaiman, Heri; Marwati, Lusi; Alfarezi, Salman; Sulistiowati, Tri; Machmud , Aris
al Hairy | Journal of Islamic Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): al Hairy
Publisher : Yapilin Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64344/hry.v1i1.13

Abstract

The problem of justice in the division of joint property after divorce has become increasingly complex in the contemporary era, along with social, economic, and legal changes. This article discusses John Rawls' theory of justice, especially the principle of justice as fairness, and its relevance in formulating joint property division policies. The purpose of this study is to examine the extent to which Rawls' theory can provide a normative framework in assessing and improving joint property division policies to be more equitable. The method used is qualitative research with a juridical-philosophical approach, through literature analysis of Rawls' works and positive legal regulations in force in several countries, including Indonesia. The research findings show that Rawls' principles of justice, especially the difference principle and the principle of equal freedom, can be used to build a joint property division system that pays attention to the balance between individual rights and protection of economically vulnerable parties. In conclusion, the formulation of joint property division policies based on Rawls' theory will encourage the creation of a legal system that is not only legalistic, but also guarantees substantive justice for both parties. Therefore, the integration of Rawlsian justice values ​​in legislation is very relevant to answer the challenges of justice in the dynamics of contemporary society.
Prenuptial Agreement as A Protection of Wife's Rights: Maqāṣid al-Syarī 'ah'ah's Analysis of The MUI Fatwa and The Constitutional Court's Decision Sulaiman, Heri; Lubis, Rahmad; Muhammad, Muhammad; Dewi, Sri; Sriani, Arlina
al Hairy | Journal of Islamic Law Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): al Hairy
Publisher : Yapilin Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64344/hry.v1i2.70

Abstract

This article examines the legal position of prenuptial agreements as an instrument for the protection of wife's rights in Islamic family law in Indonesia. Since the Constitutional Court Decision No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015, the urgency of the prenuptial agreement has increased because it is declared valid both before and after marriage. However, its role has not been fully understood as a protection mechanism for wives, especially in family economic justice. This study aims to analyze the legal position of prenuptial agreements in the perspective of the MUI Fatwa and the Constitutional Court Decision and evaluate its relevance through maqāṣid al-syarī'ah. The research method uses a normative qualitative approach through conceptual and juridical analysis. The results of the study show that the two legal instruments affirm the protection of wives on different grounds of argument: the MUI fatwa emphasizes sharia benefits and moral protection, while the Constitutional Court Decision affirms constitutional equality and distributive justice. Through the analysis of maqāṣid, the pre-marriage agreement has a preventive function that ensures the protection of property (ḥifẓ al-māl), the dignity of women (ḥifẓ al-'irḍ), and fair economic participation. Thus, the prenuptial agreement needs to be interpreted as a maqāṣid-based legal tool, not just an administrative agreement, but a substantive justice mechanism in contemporary Islamic family law,