Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Review Metode Ekstraksi : Maserasi, Perkolasi, Infusa, Soxhlet, Refluks, Ultrasonic Assisted Extraction (UAE), dan Microwave Assisted Extraction (MAE) Amaliya Bunga Dwiyanti; Devira Niken Putri Ferdinand; Mifta Dewi; Musa’adah Musa’adah; Noor Mila Wati; Rima Hindriani
JURNAL RISET RUMPUN ILMU KEDOKTERAN Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Desember : Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Kedokteran
Publisher : Pusat riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrike.v4i3.6465

Abstract

Extraction is a crucial process for obtaining active compounds from natural materials, such as medicinal plants, spices, and other biomass. The success of the extraction process is greatly influenced by the method used, as each method has its own mechanism, efficiency, and yield. This study compared seven commonly used extraction methods: maceration, percolation, infusion, soxhletation, reflux, Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction (UAE), and Microwave-Assisted Extraction (MAE). Based on data collected from various scientific journals, it was found that modern methods such as UAE and MAE are capable of producing higher yields than conventional methods. Furthermore, both methods are more efficient in terms of extraction time and solvent usage, making them more environmentally friendly and suitable for industrial-scale applications. However, conventional methods such as maceration and percolation still play an important role, especially in initial research or in laboratories with limited equipment. For example, maceration is easy to perform, does not require high energy, and is suitable for heat-sensitive materials. Other factors that influence extraction results include the type of solvent, temperature, time, and the characteristics of the natural material itself. Therefore, the choice of extraction method must be tailored to the research objectives, the type of compound to be extracted, and the availability of resources and equipment. Combining several methods can also be considered to improve the efficiency and quality of the extraction results. It should be emphasized that extraction yield is influenced not only by the method, but also by the type of material, solvent, temperature, time, and particle size. Therefore, the choice of extraction method must be tailored to the nature of the material, the type of target compound, as well as the objectives and availability of resources. In some cases, a combination of extraction methods can also be used to increase efficiency and obtain optimal results.
REVIEW PERBANDINGAN HASIL UJI WAKTU HANCUR TABLET HISAP BERDASARKAN METODE PEMBUATAN Amaliya Bunga Dwiyanti; Harris Noorrahman; Irma Muthiah; Noor Mila Wati; Silvia Rismawati; Nor Latifah
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 4 No. 7: Desember 2024
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53625/jirk.v4i7.9051

Abstract

Review Artikel ini membahas tentang perbandingan hasil uji waktu hancur tablet hisap. Di mana Tablet hisap banyak diminati di masyarakat sebab memiliki kelebihan untuk mempermudah pasien khususnya pada anak-anak dengan rasa yang enak, berbentuk yang menarik contohnya permen juga praktis dalam menggunakannya atau orang yang kesulitan menelan obat dan mudah dikonsumsi langsung tanpa menggunakan air. Tablet hisap dapat dibuat dengan berbagai metode granulasi kering, kempa langsung, serta granulasi basah. Dalam pembuatan tablet harus melakukan uji evaluasi. Pada review artikel ini kami membahas salah satu uji evaluasi yaitu waktu hancur di mana uji waktu hancur penting dalam pembuatan tablet hisap karena untuk memastikan tablet tersebut larut dengan sempurna di mulut setelah dikonsumsi. Hasil uji waktu hancur pada artikel review dengan menggunakan berbagai metode didapatkan hasil memenuhi persyaratan dimana persyaratan waktu hancur tablet hisap larut dalam <30 menit.