Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Ramdani, Rahmat Memo
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Kriminologis Terhadap Faktor Penyebab Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Sektor Publik Ramdani, Rahmat Memo; Henny Yuningsih
Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda Vol. 30 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/disiplin.v30i4.131

Abstract

Corruption in the public sector is a serious legal and social issue, potentially damaging the integrity of the government, hindering development, and reducing public trust in state institutions. Corruption Not Only Harms the State, But Also Affects Social Justice and Destroys Social Order Through the Culture of Nepotism and Collusion. In the Perspective of Criminology, the Criminogenic Factors that Encourage Corruption Can Be Seen from Personal, Organizational and Structural, Economic, Cultural, and Social Factors. Corruption also hinders the allocation of resources for development that should improve the welfare of the community, such as education, health, and infrastructure. Therefore, combating corruption must be carried out through a comprehensive approach, including bureaucratic reforms to enhance transparency and accountability, as well as changes in organizational culture that support integrity and ethics. Through these steps, it is hoped that a more transparent, efficient, and fair public sector will be created, which in turn will improve development and restore public trust in the government.
Analisis Kriminologis Terhadap Faktor Penyebab Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Sektor Publik Ramdani, Rahmat Memo; Yuningsih, Henny
Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda Vol. 30 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/disiplin.v30i4.1161

Abstract

Corruption in the public sector is a serious legal and social issue, potentially damaging the integrity of the government, hindering development, and reducing public trust in state institutions. Corruption Not Only Harms the State, But Also Affects Social Justice and Destroys Social Order Through the Culture of Nepotism and Collusion. In the Perspective of Criminology, the Criminogenic Factors that Encourage Corruption Can Be Seen from Personal, Organizational and Structural, Economic, Cultural, and Social Factors. Corruption also hinders the allocation of resources for development that should improve the welfare of the community, such as education, health, and infrastructure. Therefore, combating corruption must be carried out through a comprehensive approach, including bureaucratic reforms to enhance transparency and accountability, as well as changes in organizational culture that support integrity and ethics. Through these steps, it is hoped that a more transparent, efficient, and fair public sector will be created, which in turn will improve development and restore public trust in the government.
Kedudukan Dan Sanksi Saksi Yang Memberikan Keterangan Palsu Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam Dan Hukum Positif Indonesia Ramdani, Rahmat Memo; Nashriana, Nashriana; Febriansyah, Artha
Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Witness testimony is a crucial element in uncovering material truth in criminal proceedings. However, the practice of providing false testimony under oath remains a serious challenge that undermines the integrity of the justice system and obstructs the achievement of justice. This study analyzes the legal position of witnesses and compares sanctions for false testimony from the perspectives of Indonesian Positive Law and Islamic Criminal Law. The research employs a qualitative method with normative-juridical and comparative approaches through literature review. The findings indicate that under Indonesian Positive Law, witnesses are recognized as primary procedural evidence regulated by the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), and providing false testimony is punishable by seven to nine years of imprisonment (Article 242 of the Criminal Code) as a form of obstruction of justice. In Islamic Criminal Law, testimony emphasizes the moral integrity (‘adalah) and piety of the witness; false testimony is classified as a major sin (kabirah) and jarimah ta’zir, with sanctions applied flexibly at the discretion of the judge or ruler to restore victims’ rights and social order. Both systems agree that false testimony harms public justice, yet Positive Law emphasizes formal-repressive aspects and secular legal certainty, whereas Islamic law integrates moral, religious-ethical dimensions and spiritual accountability before God. In conclusion, strengthening law enforcement mechanisms and raising witnesses’ legal awareness are essential to ensure a dignified and transparent justice system.
Co-Authors Artha Febriansyah Henny Yuningsih Nashriana, Nashriana Yuningsih, Henny