Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum FOCUS: Journal of Social Studies
Alaidid, Muannas
Unknown Affiliation
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Tinjauan Viktimologi dan Penerapan Hukum Pidana Tentang Tindak Pidana dalam Undang-Undang ITE (Studi Kasus Putusan PN Tanjung Balai Karimun No. 96/PID.SUS/2021/PN.TBK) Alaidid, Muannas; Said, Yusuf Muhammad
FOCUS Vol 6 No 1 (2025): FOKUS: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/fcs.v6i1.1890

Abstract

This research aims to examine the application of Article 27 paragraph (3) of the Electronic Information and Transaction Law (ITE Law), especially in the context of online news. There are still many law enforcement officials, such as the Police and the Attorney General's Office, who do not understand that not all information cases can be categorised as violations of the article. For example, individuals who upload news from websites registered with the Press Council are still prosecuted for alleged violations of the ITE Law. In the digital era, the law must adapt quickly to accommodate technological innovation, cybercrime and digital privacy. This study uses a normative juridical method with systematic analysis of legal materials, including the Decision of the Tanjung Balai Karimun District Court No. 21/Pid.Sus/2021/TBK. The results show that the concepts of victimology and press law are often ignored in the application of this article. Constitutional Court Decision No. 78/PUU-XXI/2023 states that defamation in the Criminal Code and Article 27 paragraph (3) of the ITE Law is conditionally unconstitutional. Therefore, further socialisation is needed to prevent legal misunderstandings in the implementation of the article.
Reformulasi Ekstradisi terhadap Kejahatan Lintas Batas Negara di Era Globalisasi (Studi Kasus Warga Negara Rakyat Republik Tiongkok dengan Taiwan) Said, Yusuf Muhamad; Alaidid, Muannas; Huda, Misbahul; Havid, Dian Priheryanti
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6540

Abstract

Indonesia's extradition laws, particularly Law No. 1 of 1979, face challenges in the globalization era, especially with cross-border crimes involving citizens from China and Taiwan. The current civil law and administrative procedure system allows for significant government subjectivity, unlike common law systems that prioritize due process and judicial decisions, where individuals can refuse extradition. This was evident in Indonesia's rejection of Taiwanese citizens' extradition to China and Hendra Rahardja's refusal from Australia, highlighting the need to curb politically motivated or unjust refusals. Therefore, reform of Extradition Law No. 1 of 1979, specifically Article 14, is crucial. This reform should enhance legal certainty, reduce subjectivity, and uphold national sovereignty and justice principles. It must also embrace a "living law" concept, aligning with societal values and ensuring practical benefits. Furthermore, Indonesia should actively champion an ASEAN extradition convention with common standards, particularly for sophisticated cybercrime, drawing inspiration from the European Union's model.
Co-Authors Havid, Dian Priheryanti Misbahul Huda Said, Yusuf Muhamad Said, Yusuf Muhammad