Auwal Salisu
Federal University Gashua, Nigeria

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Deconstruction of Patriarchal Interpretation of the Concept of Nafsin Wahidah in Surah An-Nisa: An Analysis of the Hermeneutics of Tauhid Asma Barlas' Perspective on Gender Equality Afifah Fitria Nugroho; Auwal Salisu; Moh. Nor Ichwan
Jurnal test Vol 4 No 2 (2025): September
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58363/alfahmu.v4i2.631

Abstract

This research examines the concept of nafsin wahidah in Surah An-Nisa verse 1 through Asma Barlas's anti-patriarchal theological perspective to address the dominance of classical exegesis that exhibits gender bias. This verse is often used to justify gender hierarchy through the narrative of Eve's creation from Adam's rib, despite the Qur'an not explicitly mentioning this. The significance of this study lies in its attempt to deconstruct the patriarchal legacy within the exegetical tradition that has resulted in social and legal inequalities against Muslim women. This research employs a qualitative approach with text analysis methods based on Asma Barlas's hermeneutics of tawhid, involving linguistic and historical analysis of QS. An-Nisa verse 1, as well as comparisons between classical exegesis and Barlas's approach in Believing Women in Islam. The analysis reveals that nafsin wahidah refers to the non-gendered and equal essence of humanity, rather than representing Adam as a superior male. Barlas dismantles patriarchal assumptions in classical exegesis by demonstrating that the concept of zaujaha emphasizes mutuality, not subordination. The hermeneutics of tawhid developed by Barlas positions the principle of God's oneness as the ethical and theological foundation for understanding gender equality. This research affirms that the Qur'an, when read contextually and justly, supports egalitarian relations between men and women. It is recommended that the hermeneutics of tawhid approach be applied more broadly in exegetical studies to build an inclusive and gender-just Islamic theology.
Integrating Islamic Principles and Modern Counseling Approaches in Managing Family Crises: Evidence from Northwestern Nigeria Kabiru Uba Ibrahim; Amb. Usman Mallam Hussaini; Auwal Salisu; Abubakar Siddiq Uba
International Journal of Religious and Interdisciplinary Studies Vol 2 No 2 (2025): September
Publisher : RaSAIL Media Group, Semarang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64529/f6mapp78

Abstract

This study makes family crisis management in Muslim families in the Northwestern region of Nigeria a tangible subject, with an emphasis on integrating Islamic principles and modern counseling approaches. The objectives of this study are to identify the primary causes of family crisis, examine relevant Islamic teachings on family conflict resolution, analyze contemporary approaches to managing family crises, and assess the effectiveness of integrated models that combine spiritual, moral, and psychological dimensions. This study uses a descriptive qualitative design with purposive sampling techniques involving Muslim couples, scholars, family counselors, and social workers. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions (FGDs), and document analysis, then analyzed using thematic analysis techniques. The study's results indicate that family crises are often triggered by economic pressure, communication failures, and a lack of understanding of marital responsibilities. Islamic principles, such as sabr (patience), shura (consultation), and rahmah (compassion), have proven crucial in defusing conflicts and fostering family harmony. Modern approaches, particularly cognitive-behavioral therapy and structured family counseling, can help improve communication and emotional management. This research contributes by offering a culturally sensitive, integrative model that links Islamic ethics and modern psychology, providing practical implications for family counselors, religious institutions, and policymakers in strengthening the resilience of Muslim families. This study makes family crisis management in Muslim families in the Northwestern region of Nigeria a tangible subject, with an emphasis on integrating Islamic principles and modern counseling approaches. The objectives of this study are to identify the primary causes of family crisis, examine relevant Islamic teachings on family conflict resolution, analyze contemporary approaches to managing family crises, and assess the effectiveness of integrated models that combine spiritual, moral, and psychological dimensions. This study uses a descriptive qualitative design with purposive sampling techniques involving Muslim couples, scholars, family counselors, and social workers. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions (FGDs), and document analysis, then analyzed using thematic analysis techniques. The study's results indicate that family crises are often triggered by economic pressure, communication failures, and a lack of understanding of marital responsibilities. Islamic principles, such as sabr (patience), shura (consultation), and rahmah (compassion), have proven crucial in defusing conflicts and fostering family harmony. Modern approaches, particularly cognitive-behavioral therapy and structured family counseling, can help improve communication and emotional management. This research contributes by offering a culturally sensitive, integrative model that links Islamic ethics and modern psychology and provides practical implications for family counselors, religious institutions, and policymakers in strengthening the resilience of Muslim families.
DECONSTRUCTING PATRIARCHY IN QURANIC EXEGESIS: Al-Marāghī’s Progressive Hermeneutics and Gender Identity Negotiation Tahir Tahir; Moh. Nor Ichwan; Auwal Salisu
TAJDID: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol. 25 No. 1 (2026): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin and Religious Studies UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30631/tjd.v25i1.5205

Abstract

The discourse of gender identity in the interpretation of the Qur'an has become a crucial issue as awareness of gender inequality in Muslim society increases. This phenomenon is notable because traditional interpretations are often patriarchally biased, fueling demands for more inclusive hermeneutics. This study aims to analyze Aḥmad Muṣṭafā al-Marāghī's hermeneutic approach in interpreting gender verses, as well as evaluate his contribution to the discourse on gender equality in Islam. The method employed is a critical analysis of Tafsīr al-Marāghī, utilizing an interdisciplinary approach that combines the study of religion, gender, and hermeneutics. The results of the study show that al-Marāghī developed a contextual method of " maqāṣidī interpretation", deconstructing traditional gender narratives and opening up a space for negotiation between sacred texts and social realities. The main findings reveal that gender identity is dynamic in its interpretation, influenced by the interaction of texts, readers, and socio-historical contexts. The contribution of this research lies in enriching modern interpretation theory with an inclusive framework, as well as providing practical recommendations for Islamic education curricula and gender justice policy advocacy.
Hermeneutics of Religious Freedom in Modern and Contemporary Interpretation: A Comparative Analysis between Tafsir al-Manar and Fazlur Rahman Prisilia Maya Safa; Moh. Nor Ichwan; Auwal Salisu
Millati: Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): MILLATI
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Salatiga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18326/millati.v10i1.4194

Abstract

In response to the global challenges of rising intolerance and the politicization of religion, this study explores the hermeneutics of religious freedom in Islam through a comparative analysis of Tafsir al-Manar and Fazlur Rahman’s double movement methodology. Employing a qualitative comparative design grounded in philosophical hermeneutics, the research analyzes primary texts of Tafsir al-Manar and Rahman’s key works, supported by recent secondary literature. The findings indicate that al-Manar adopts a rational-contextualist approach that prioritizes communal protection against colonial-era religious coercion, whereas Rahman articulates universal ethical principles centered on freedom of conscience, resonating with contemporary human rights discourse. This study proposes an integrative hermeneutical model that synthesizes historical consciousness with universal ethics, enabling QS. Al-Baqarah (2:256) is to be interpreted both as a safeguard against forced conversion and as a timeless affirmation of religious freedom. The proposed model offers practical implications for policy development, particularly in the areas of religious freedom advocacy, interfaith dialogue, and inclusive Islamic educational curricula. This research contributes to Qur'anic hermeneutics by bridging traditional exegesis and modern ethical concerns, offering a framework that is both contextually grounded and normatively responsive to pluralistic Muslim societies.