Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review (GRLSPR) Soedirman Law Review Jatijajar Law Review
Iryatin, Al Fiani Nenden
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Tantangan dan Peran Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen pada Era Ekonomi Digital Masturi, Frida Nurrahma; Herlan, Asep; Iryatin, Al Fiani Nenden; Mardianto, Agus
Soedirman Law Review Vol 7, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.slr.2025.7.1.16095

Abstract

Perkembangan ekonomi digital telah mengubah cara konsumen berinteraksi dalam transaksi bisnis, dimana sekarang ini dapat menghadirkan peluang sekaligus tantangan baru dalam perlindungan konsumen. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran hukum dalam melindungi hak-hak konsumen di era ekonomi digital, tantangan hukum yang dihadapi, serta perbandingan perlindungan konsumen di Indonesia, China, dan Jepang. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan melakukan analisis terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan seperti UUPK, UU ITE, dan PP PSTE. Dari hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa regulasi di Indonesia belum sepenuhnya mengakomodasi karakteristik transaksi digital, seperti perlindungan terhadap data pribadi dan transaksi lintas negara. Tantangan utama meliputi celah hukum, kurangnya literasi konsumen, serta kelemahan penegakan hukum. Dibandingkan dengan China dan Jepang, Indonesia perlu memperkuat regulasi dan penegakan hukum serta meningkatkan literasi digital kepada masyarakat. Penelitian ini memberikan rekomendasi untuk memperkuat perlindungan konsumen melalui kebijakan adaptif, pengawasan berbasis teknologi, dan kolaborasi lintas sektor guna menciptakan ekosistem ekonomi digital yang aman dan berkelanjutan.Kata Kunci: Tantangan dan Peran Hukum; Perlindungan Konsumen; Ekonomi Digital.
Problems with Mortgage Rights on Inherited Property Masturi, Frida Nurrahma; Asep Herlan; Al Fiani Nenden Iryatin
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 03 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i03.1517

Abstract

The increasing economic activity, particularly in the banking sector, has led to land being frequently used as the primary guarantee in credit agreements through mortgage rights (hak tanggungan). However, problems arise when the debtor passes away and the mortgaged land becomes part of the inheritance. Since mortgage rights are characterized by the droit de suite principle, the right remains attached to the land regardless of changes in proprietary rights. This legal characteristic often leads to conflicts between creditors and heirs, especially when the heirs were not involved in or unaware of the original credit agreement. Meanwhile, banking institutions require legal certainty over guarantee to exercise their execution rights effectively. This research aims to identify the legal convergence between inheritance rights and mortgage rights in order to uphold justice and legal certainty for all parties involved. The study adopts a normative juridical approach, using secondary data derived from statutory regulations and legal literature. The findings reveal that the lack of synchronization between inheritance law and security law creates legal uncertainty and practical problems, which can only be resolved through regulatory harmonization and procedural clarity in guarantee execution involving inherited land
Kewajiban Penggunaan Bahasa Indonesia dalam Perjanjian Sewa Komersial: Perspektif Yuridis dalam Hukum Kontrak Indonesia Herlan, Asep; Rizqi, Aditya Maulana; Masturi, Frida Nurrahma; Iryatin, Al Fiani Nenden
JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW Vol 4, No 1 (2025): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Muhammadiyah Gombong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26753/jlr.v4i1.1588

Abstract

The difference of opinion among judges regarding the obligation to use Indonesian in rental agreements, as seen in District Court Decision Number 101/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Jkt.Sel and Supreme Court Decision Number 3230 K/Pdt/2018, creates legal uncertainty. This stems from confusion in interpreting whether the use of Indonesian is a halal causa requirement or merely a formality. This research employs a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings indicate that halal causa relates to the substance of an agreement, not the language used. The South Jakarta District Court mistakenly viewed the obligation to use Indonesian as a halal causa requirement, while the Supreme Court misinterpreted it as a mere formality. In reality, the use of Indonesian is a formality condition, not a halal causa requirement. When drafting business agreements, parties must understand the validity conditions and legal requirements. To prevent inconsistencies, improving judicial decision-making quality is essential.
Force Majeure Clause in the Covid-19 Vaccine Purchase Contract between Kimia Farma Tbk and Sinopharm Herlan, Asep; Masturi, Frida Nurrahma; Iryatin, Al Fiani Nenden
Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): July - December
Publisher : Manunggal Halim Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52970/grlspr.v5i1.1694

Abstract

Force majeure clauses in contracts are usually used as a complement to business agreements. The absence of special regulations that regulate in detail the force majeure clause often causes problems in the preparation of contracts. The force majeure clause became important and was widely used during the Covid-19 pandemic as a legal basis to overcome obstacles in the implementation of the parties' obligations due to unforeseen circumstances., through the Contract for the Purchase of Sars-Cov-2 Vaccine (Vero Cells), Inactivity or Covid-19 Vaccine (Vero Cells), Until now, the force majeure benchmark in the applicable legal provisions in Indonesia is regulated in a limited manner in Articles 1244-1245 of the Civil Code. The research method used was juridical normative by analyzing the force majeure clause in the Sars-CoV-2 Vaccine Purchase Contract (Vero Cell), Inactive or Covid-19 Vaccine (Vero Cell), Inactive between PT. Kimia Farma Tbk and Sinopharm China. The results of the study show that Article 10 Paragraph (4) of the Sars-CoV-2 Vaccine Purchase Contract (Vero Cell), Inactivation or Covid-19 Vaccine (Vero Cell), Deactivated between PT. Kimia Farma Tbk and Sinopharm China did not comply with one of the provisions in Articles 1244-1245 of the Civil Code, namely: elements that were not anticipated beforehand. Based on the results of the analysis, this study is expected to provide legal recommendations for the preparation of force majeure clauses in international business contracts in the future to be more in line with the principles of Indonesian civil law.
Co-Authors Agus Mardianto Asep Herlan Herlan, Asep Masturi, Frida Nurrahma Rizqi, Aditya Maulana