Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Climate Change, Gender and Media in Nigeria: Mainstreaming Gender in Climate Change Reporting Funmi Falobi; Margaret Solo-Anaeto; Joseph Ifeoluwa Joy; Abdullahi Aliyu Maiwada
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 9, No 2 (2026): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute May
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v9i2.8202

Abstract

Climate change represents one of the most pressing global challenges, with far-reaching impacts across social, economic, and environmental systems. However, its effects are not evenly distributed, as existing inequalities shape differential vulnerabilities among populations. This paper interrogates the gendered dimensions of climate change, arguing that women and marginalised groups particularly in developing countries, experience disproportionate impacts due to entrenched socio-economic, cultural, and political disparities. Based on secondary data from the existing literature, the study highlights how climate change exacerbates challenges related to health, food security, water access, livelihoods, education, and exposure to violence, thereby reinforcing gender inequality. Anchored in framing theory, the paper analyses how media representations influence perception, agenda-setting, and policy prioritisation. It argues that the media serves as a powerful agent in raising awareness, amplifying marginalised voices, and promoting gender-sensitive narratives that can drive inclusive climate action. Through illustrative case studies from Nigerian print media, the paper demonstrates emerging efforts and best practices in mainstreaming gender into climate reporting, while also identifying gaps in representation and depth of coverage. The paper concludes that effective climate action requires the integration of gender perspectives into communication, policy, and practice.
Internet Memes as Alternative Frames in Global Media Coverage of the Gaza Conflict Margaret Solo-Anaeto; Funmi Falobi; Abdullahi Aliyu Maiwada; Joseph Ifeoluwa Joy
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 9, No 2 (2026): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute May
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v9i2.8203

Abstract

The rapid evolution of digital communication technologies has significantly transformed the ways in which global audiences access and interpret international news, with social media platforms emerging as dominant channels of information dissemination. Within this digital ecosystem, internet memes have evolved from mere entertainment artifacts into powerful tools of communication that shape political discourse and public opinion. This paper examines the role of internet memes as instruments of international coverage of the Gaza War, exploring their capacity to simplify complex conflict narratives, influence audience perceptions, and contribute to the framing of global events. Within the context of the existing literature, the paper conceptualises memes as participatory media forms that combine visual and textual elements, enabling rapid circulation, emotional engagement, and ideological expression across diverse audiences. Using Framing Theory, the paper analyses how memes selectively present aspects of the Gaza conflict, emphasizing particular viewpoints, emotions, and interpretations while potentially marginalising others. The paper argues that memes function as alternative communicative frames that can both legitimize and delegitimize political actors, amplify humanitarian concerns, and foster global solidarity. At the same time, their brevity, humor, and symbolic nature pose risks of oversimplification, misinformation, and ideological distortion, particularly within the fast-paced and algorithm-driven environment of social media. The paper concludes that internet memes occupy a dual position as both facilitators of engagement and potential sources of distortion in international conflict reporting. As digital culture continues to evolve, memes will remain central to how global audiences consume, interpret, and respond to international events.
Communicating the Results of Capacity-Building Initiatives More Effectively: Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) Experience and Lessons Learned Abdullahi Aliyu Maiwada
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 9, No 2 (2026): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute May
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v9i2.8194

Abstract

Capacity building has become a central pillar of institutional reform in public sector organisations, particularly in customs administrations that operate at the intersection of trade facilitation, national security, and revenue generation. However, the effectiveness of such initiatives depends not only on technical reforms but also on the ability of institutions to communicate their outcomes to internal and external stakeholders. This paper examines the strategic communication framework adopted by the Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) in communicating the results of its capacity-building initiatives. Based on institutional reforms implemented in alignment with the Nigeria Customs Service Act of 2023, the paper analyses communication practices related to institutional modernisation, human resource development, and stakeholder engagement. Using empirical examples such as the Time Release Study (TRS), Advance Ruling system, Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) programme, and the B’Odogwu indigenous customs management system, the paper demonstrates how communication strategies transformed technical reforms into measurable institutional credibility and stakeholder trust. The paper situates the NCS experience within broader theoretical discussions on strategic communication, public sector transparency, and trade facilitation governance. The paper argues that communication that emphasises transparency, evidence-based messaging, and stakeholder participation can significantly improve compliance behaviour, institutional legitimacy, and policy outcomes. The paper concludes that communication should be integrated into the design of capacity-building initiatives from the outset, rather than treated as a post-implementation publicity exercise.