Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Aliran Realisme Hukum Dalam Filsafat Hukum Islam Dan Barat Siregar, Rais Abdurrahman; Arfa, Faisar Ananda; Nurasiah, Nurasiah
Jurnal Media Informatika Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Media Informatika
Publisher : Lembaga Dongan Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55338/jumin.v6i2.5542

Abstract

Aliran realisme hukum lahir untuk menjawab kritik terhadap Aliran hukum positif atau positivisme, yaitu salah satu aliran hukum yang memandang perlu adanya pemisahan antara hukum dengan moral. Aliran realisme hukum memisahkan sementara antara das sollen dan das sein agar dapat menemukan hakikat hukum yang sebenarnya. Menariknya, nilai realisme hukum juga dapat ditemukan didalam hukum Islam. Meskipun hukum Islam berlandaskan Al-Qur’an dan Hadits, tetapi pemahaman hukum Islam didasarkan atas pertimbangan realitas sosial yang berkembang di masyarakat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengurai dan menjelaskan bagaimana aliran realisme hukum dalam filsafat hukum Islam dan Barat. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan filsafat hukum Islam dan Barat. Penelitian dilakukan dengan cara mengkaji dan menganalisis literatur-literatur yang relevan dengan topik penelitian yang sedang dilakukan, seperti literatur hukum Islam dan teori-teori hukum Barat. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa aliran realisme hukum melalui kacamata filsafat hukum Barat memandang hukum bukan hanya berada pada keilmuan hukum saja, tetapi juga meliputi kepribadian manusia dan lainnya. Begitupun dengan realisme hukum dalam pandangan filsafat hukum Islam, bahwa pemahaman hukum Islam didasarkan atas pertimbangan realitas sosial yang berkembang di masyarakat, atau berdasarkan fakta yang terjadi di masyarakat. Salahsatu contoh produk hukum Islam yang mengandung nilai realisme hukum adalah Fatwa
Reconstruction Of Corruption Criminal Acts Law Connectivity In Military Justice: Analysis Of Constitutional Court Decision Number 87/Puu-Xxi/2023 From The Perspective Of Maslahah Mursalah Siregar, Rais Abdurrahman; Lubis, Fauziah; Tanjung, Dhiauddin
JHSS (JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL STUDIES) Vol 9, No 2 (2025): Journal of Humanities and Social Studies
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PAKUAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33751/jhss.v9i2.12659

Abstract

Legal uncertainty regarding jurisdiction in cases of corruption involving civilian and military actors, as well as its impact on the effectiveness of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK RI), has caused the KPK RI to hesitate in investigating cases of corruption, which could potentially hinder the optimal handling of cases and harm the constitutional rights of citizens to receive the benefits of development. This study aims to unravel how the military hierarchy structure, military court jurisdiction, and analyze the Constitutional Court (MK) Decision Number 87/PUU-XXI/2023 are carried out through the perspective of Maslahah Mursalah, an Islamic legal philosophy that focuses on public welfare and benefit. These research uses a qualitative method with a legal-normative approach. The research is conducted by reviewing and analyzing relevant literature related to the research topic being studied. The results of the study indicate that the military environment is classified as a social stratification when viewed from a legal sociology perspective, with one of its characteristics being the existence of differences in rank and position within the military hierarchy. Furthermore, progressive law advocates the need to revise the Military Court Act so that military personnel who commit general criminal offenses can be fully tried in civilian courts, which undoubtedly represents a significant step forward toward a more humane and just legal system. Furthermore, an analysis of the Maslahah Mursalah principle regarding the Constitutional Court's Decision No. 87/PUU-XXI/2023, using the criteria outlined by Asy-Syatibi, shows that the Court, in its decision, considered the principle of legal certainty as explained in its legal reasoning, as well as Islamic law governing the principle of legal certainty, thereby ensuring that this decision does not contradict Islamic law.