Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Transformasi Keuangan Komunitas: Implementasi Pembukuan Online untuk Toko Kelontong di Sepanjang Urban Ramindra Rd Eliana Eliana; Malahayatie Malahayatie; Rahma Nurzianti; Yani Rizal
Seumike : Society Progress Journal Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): SEUMIKE
Publisher : Bansigom Na Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64826/seumike.v1i2.0063

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas transformasi keuangan komunitas melalui implementasi sistem pembukuan online pada toko kelontong yang tersebar di sepanjang kawasan urban Ramindra Rd. Dalam era digitalisasi yang terus berkembang, toko kelontong tradisional menghadapi tantangan dalam pengelolaan keuangan yang efisien dan transparan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi dampak penggunaan aplikasi pembukuan digital terhadap peningkatan literasi keuangan, efisiensi operasional, serta keberlanjutan usaha mikro di lingkungan urban. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan studi kasus dengan observasi langsung, wawancara, dan analisis data keuangan sebelum dan sesudah implementasi sistem. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa digitalisasi pembukuan mampu meningkatkan akurasi pencatatan, mempercepat proses pengambilan keputusan, serta memperkuat daya saing toko kelontong di tengah persaingan modern retail. Kesimpulan dari studi ini menekankan pentingnya pelatihan dan pendampingan berkelanjutan dalam penerapan teknologi digital bagi pelaku usaha mikro agar transformasi keuangan komunitas dapat berlangsung secara inklusif dan berkelanjutan.
The Impact of Corporate Governance Mechanisms on Strategic Risk Management and Firm Performance Rahma Nurzianti; Tosi Rahmaddian; Mokhamad Yaurizqika Hadi
Journal Management & Economics Review (JUMPER) Vol. 3 No. 7 (2026): January
Publisher : Malaqbi Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59971/jumper.v3i7.827

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of corporate governance mechanisms on strategic risk management (SRM) and firm performance, with SRM examined as a mediating variable. Using a quantitative approach and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), data were collected from managerial-level respondents across firms operating in dynamic and high-risk environments. The results reveal that board independence and board expertise significantly enhance SRM practices, underscoring the role of effective oversight and domain knowledge in shaping strategic responses to risk. SRM is also found to have a strong positive effect on firm performance, demonstrating its strategic value in improving organizational resilience and competitive advantage. However, board independence, board expertise, and board size show no direct effect on firm performance, indicating that governance mechanisms influence outcomes primarily through risk management processes rather than direct governance intervention. Board size also exhibits no significant relationship with SRM, suggesting that capability and functional effectiveness matter more than structural characteristics. Furthermore, SRM significantly mediates the relationships between board independence and firm performance, and between board expertise and firm performance, confirming its role as a crucial conduit through which governance affects organizational results. Overall, the findings reinforce the importance of aligning governance quality with strategic risk practices to enhance firm performance in increasingly unpredictable business environments.
The Influence of Overconfidence Bias, Loss Aversion, and Herding Behavior on Stock Investment Decisions among Retail Investors Liestyowati; Rahma Nurzianti; Ponjaya Tri Handayani; Seno Lamsir
Journal Management & Economics Review (JUMPER) Vol. 3 No. 10. 1 (2026): Special Issue: Call For Paper JUMPER
Publisher : Malaqbi Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59971/jumper.v3i10. 1.793

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of behavioral biases, specifically overconfidence bias, loss aversion, and herding behavior on stock investment decisions among retail investors. Grounded in the principles of Behavioral Finance, the research challenges the assumption of investor rationality by examining how psychological factors shape financial decision-making. A quantitative research approach was employed, using structured questionnaires to collect data from 250 retail investors. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, correlation, and multiple regression techniques. The findings reveal that all three behavioral biases have a significant positive impact on investment decisions. Among them, overconfidence bias emerged as the most influential factor, indicating that investors who overestimate their knowledge and abilities are more likely to make assertive and frequent investment decisions. Herding behavior was also found to significantly affect decisions, suggesting that investors tend to follow the actions of others, especially in uncertain market conditions. Additionally, loss aversion plays a critical role, as investors exhibit a strong preference to avoid losses, consistent with Prospect Theory. The model explains a substantial proportion of variance in investment decisions, highlighting the importance of psychological factors in financial behavior. The study contributes to the growing literature on behavioral finance by providing empirical evidence on the role of cognitive biases in retail investment decisions. It also offers practical implications for investors, financial advisors, and policymakers by emphasizing the need for increased awareness, financial education, and strategies to mitigate the adverse effects of behavioral biases. Overall, the findings underscore the importance of integrating behavioral insights into investment decision-making frameworks to better understand and improve investor outcomes in modern financial markets.