Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Pelanggaran Imunitas Diplomatik oleh Petugas Imigrasi Indonesia Kajian Yuridis terhadap Konvensi Wina 1961 Anesva Sari Della; Zahra Utami Aprilia; Firdhan Azhim Akbar; Ema Septaria; M. Ilham Adepio
Journal of Innovative and Creativity Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/joecy.v5i2.408

Abstract

Diplomatic Immunity is one of the important things in international relations, which is regulated by the 1961 Vienna Convention to protect diplomats in carrying out their duties. However, the application of this immunity often poses challenges, especially when there is tension between international law and domestic law. Such as in the incident involving Nigerian diplomats who were attacked by Indonesian immigration officers in 2021. This incident raises the question of how the Principle of Diplomatic Immunity Relates to Indonesian Immigration Law and How the Implementation of Indonesian Immigration Law Policy is in the Case of Nigerian Diplomats. This study uses a normative approach with the Statute Approach method, namely the approach to statutory regulations consisting of legal materials and is of a library research nature. The results of this study indicate that, although Indonesia has a strict immigration policy, the protection of diplomatic rights based on the 1961 Vienna Convention has not been fully implemented. Weaknesses in the understanding of officers require increased training on diplomatic immunity, integrated supervision, and alignment of immigration regulations to prevent diplomatic conflicts and maintain the stability of international relations. This study suggests that Indonesia can strengthen immigration officer training on diplomatic immunity, as well as align immigration regulations with the principle of diplomat protection to prevent escalation of diplomatic conflicts and maintain its global reputation.
Kekuatan Perjanjian Internasional Terhadap Negara Yang Telah Meratifikasi: Analisis Kasus Sengketa Laut Cina Selatan Muhammad Yogi Nofran; M. Azzah Rozanda; Firdhan Azhim Akbar
Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): April - Juni
Publisher : GLOBAL SCIENTS PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study analyzes the binding force of international treaties on ratifying states, focusing on the People's Republic of China's (PRC) rejection of the 2016 Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) Award in the South China Sea dispute. Despite ratifying the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982, China rejected the arbitral award won by the Philippines. This normative legal research employs statutory, case, and conceptual approaches with prescriptive-analytical analysis. The findings indicate that ratified international treaties possess binding force based on the principles of pacta sunt servanda and good faith as stipulated in the Vienna Convention 1969. China's rejection of the PCA award constitutes a violation of Article 296 UNCLOS, which mandates compliance with dispute settlement decisions. Legal implications of this rejection include breach of international obligations, undermining the credibility of the international legal system, and setting negative precedents for other states. However, limitations in international law enforcement mechanisms remain a primary challenge in ensuring state compliance with treaty obligations.
Peran Hukum Keuangan dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Korupsi Berdasarkan Undang-Undang yang Berlaku di Indonesia Saroza Idramsyah Raihan; Handra Anie; Firdhan Azhim Akbar; Desi Hafizah
Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Penerbit Jurnal Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53697/iso.v5i1.2411

Abstract

Korupsi, yang berasal dari bahasa Latin "corruptus," merupakan tantangan signifikan di Indonesia, merusak stabilitas ekonomi dan kepercayaan publik. Penelitian ini mengkaji peran hukum keuangan dalam pemberantasan korupsi, dengan fokus pada efektivitas dan implementasinya. Menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, analisis ini mengacu pada bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier untuk mengeksplorasi hubungan antara hukum keuangan dan upaya pemberantasan korupsi. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa hukum keuangan berperan penting dalam mempromosikan transparansi dan akuntabilitas dalam pengelolaan keuangan negara, sehingga mencegah korupsi. Pengawasan yang efektif dan penegakan hukum yang ketat sangat penting untuk mengurangi peluang terjadinya praktik korupsi. Namun, tantangan seperti keterbatasan sumber daya manusia dan koordinasi antar lembaga yang suboptimal masih ada. Penguatan kapasitas institusi dan peningkatan kerangka regulasi diperlukan untuk meningkatkan efektivitas hukum keuangan dalam pemberantasan korupsi. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan kontribusi pada pengembangan strategi pemberantasan korupsi yang lebih efektif di Indonesia.
Kekuatan Mengikat Perjanjian Internasional dan Akibat Hukum Pelanggaran Berdasarkan Konvensi Wina 1969 Firdhan Azhim Akbar; Ema Septariad; M. Ilham Adepioe
Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): April - Juni
Publisher : GLOBAL SCIENTS PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

International treaties are one of the primary sources of international law that serve as the basis for relations and cooperation among states. The existence of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties provides a legal framework governing the formation, implementation, and termination of international treaties. In its implementation, every state is obliged to comply with the principle of pacta sunt servanda, which emphasizes that every agreement that has been validly concluded must be carried out in good faith. However, in the practice of international relations, violations of treaty obligations are still frequently found, including unilateral interpretations, delays in fulfilling obligations, and unilateral termination of treaties. This study aims to analyze the binding force of international treaties based on the 1969 Vienna Convention and to examine the legal consequences arising from violations of international treaties. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The data used are secondary data obtained through library research on the 1969 Vienna Convention, books, journals, and other international law literature. The data analysis technique uses descriptive qualitative analysis to explain the relationship between the principle of pacta sunt servanda, state obligations, and the legal consequences of treaty violations. The results of this study indicate that the binding force of international treaties arises from the consent of states to be bound by a treaty through ratification, acceptance, approval, or accession as regulated in the 1969 Vienna Convention. In addition, violations of international treaties may result in legal consequences such as suspension, termination, or withdrawal from treaties in accordance with the provisions of the 1969 Vienna Convention. The implications of this study highlight the importance of strengthening state commitment in consistently implementing international obligations in order to maintain legal certainty, stability in international relations, and mutual trust among states