Muh. Ali Masnun
Universitas Brawijaya

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

A Comparative Analysis of Asset Forfeiture Regulations in Criminal Offenses: The Case of Indonesia, the United Kingdom, and New Zea-land Zamroati Tsalisa Santosa; Muh. Ali Masnun; Thamasi Konara
Indonesian Journal of Administrative Law and Local Government Vol. 2 No. 01 (2025): INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT (IJALGOV)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/ijalgov.v1i01.40721

Abstract

Corruption is a type of crime driven by economic motives because it has a negative impact on a country’s economic activities and financial stability. In Indonesia, corruption is an ongoing issue that must be eradicated. This is due to the fact that the financial losses suffered by the state as a result of corruption are enormous. However, the amount of recovered losses is not proportional to the losses themselves. Based on this, efforts are needed to recover state losses, one of which is through asset forfeiture. This study aims to analyze the existing regulation of asset forfeiture related to criminal offenses in Indonesia and to compare the legal frameworks for asset forfeiture between Indonesia, the United Kingdom, and New Zealand. This study uses normative legal research methods. The research approach applied includes statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Data collection techniques were conducted through literature review, while the analysis technique used is prescriptive qualitative analysis. The results of the study show that the existing regulations on asset forfeiture in Indonesia are governed by various laws and regulations. The asset forfeiture mechanism adopted by Indonesia is in personam asset forfeiture. Meanwhile, the United Kingdom and New Zealand have added in rem asset forfeiture mechanism to their legal systems. In conclusion, Indonesia’s current regulation, which still relies on in personam asset forfeiture, is not yet sufficiently effective in recovering state losses caused by corruption
Penguatan Literasi Hukum dalam Tata Kelola BUMDes Kalurahan Nglanggeran Menuju Desa Mandiri Fakultas Hukum Universitas Negeri Surabaya; Intan Lovisonnya; Hananto Widodo; Sulaksono Sulaksono; Muh. Ali Masnun; Bachrul Amiq; Hikam Hulwanullah
Jurnal Darma Loka Vol 1 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The legal literacy strengthening program for the governance of BUMDes Kalurahan Nglanggeran aims to enhance the legal capacity of BUMDes managers so they can perform institutional functions in an accountable, professional, and regulation-compliant manner. The methods employed include the Legal Literacy Approach and Participatory Action Research (PAR), involving active participation from BUMDes managers, village government, and local community through pre-test, post-test, focus group discussions, problem identification, and legal drafting sessions. The results indicate a significant improvement in legal understanding, demonstrated by a post-test score increase of more than 25% and active participation exceeding 80% of participants. These achievements affirm that legal literacy is not merely a transfer of knowledge but serves as a legal empowerment instrument that strengthens BUMDes governance as a legitimate and autonomous legal entity. Legal literacy thus becomes a fundamental pillar to prevent maladministration, enhance accountability, and ensure the sustainability of village enterprises based on the principles of good governance. The main recommendation of this program is the need for continuous legal assistance and collaborative efforts between village authorities, universities, and local stakeholders to establish an adaptive and progressive legal ecosystem toward an independent village.