Mumaddun Khaerudin Salami
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Pengelolaan Pertanian Pada Masyarakat Adat Kampar Rahmat GM Manik; Hengki Firmanda; Meriza Elpa Darnia; Mumaddun Khaerudin Salami
Riau Law Journal Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30652/rlj.8.2.176-191

Abstract

Agricultural land has a social function whose benefits are very helpful to improve the welfare of the community in order to realize social justice. Land exploitation agreements with production sharing are regulated in customary law based on an agreement between the landowner and the tenant farmer in return for the results agreed by both parties. In its development, the production sharing agreement is regulated through Law Number 2 of 1960 Concerning Production Sharing Agreements. In the Kampar Regency area, which has indigenous peoples and still upholds life based on customs or still maintains local wisdom. Access to agricultural management is an important aspect for indigenous peoples, especially for indigenous groups that are still dependent on natural resources. In managing agricultural land, indigenous peoples in Kampar Regency, one of which is carried out by cooperating in agricultural land management between fellow indigenous peoples. The urgency of this writing is to see the implementation of agricultural management agreements in indigenous peoples in Kampar Regency. The results of this study are that not all indigenous peoples carry out agricultural land management agreements, agricultural management agreements are carried out because the majority of the population works as farmers, but not all people have land for farming. Agreements are made in writing for agricultural management. Obstacles to the Implementation of profit- sharing agreements in the indigenous people of Kampar Regency include when implementing the Harvest, the cultivator does not share the results in accordance with the agreement. Discrepancies in understanding between indigenous peoples are cultivators and indigenous peoples as landowners. The lack of understanding of indigenous peoples regarding agricultural profit-sharing arrangements and tenurial conflicts that still occur in Kampar have also become obstacles in the implementation of agricultural land management agreements in Kampar indigenous peoples.
Analogi Hukum Harta Bersama Perkawinan Islam Dengan Konsep Ekonomi Islam (Syirkah) Mumaddun Khaerudin Salami; Meriza Elpha Darnia; Tike Murti Sari Dewi
Riau Law Journal Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): Riau Law Journal
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30652/rlj.9.1.58-72

Abstract

Marriage is one of the rights of every person; the right to marry is protected by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, article 28B paragraph 1. Meanwhile, marriage according to Islamic law is a commandment of Allah and the sunnah of the Prophet Muhammad. The marriage contract in marriage aims to unite two people in a sacred bond that has the value of worship. However, even though it is bound by the marriage contract, it does not immediately unite the assets of both parties, assets obtained before marriages remain the personal property of each party. Meanwhile, regarding assets obtained during marriage or joint assets as explained in Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning marriage. Islam does not recognize the concept of joint assets, and then the concept of joint assets was formulated by the government and scholars in Indonesia as written in the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) allowing the implementation of joint assets by equating the legal issues with the concept of "syirkah" which was previously only known in Islamic economics. The purpose of this writing is to understand and analyze how the concept of "syirkah" can be used in cases of joint assets in Islamic marriages. The method used in this study is a descriptive normative method. The normative approach is legal research that uses secondary data sources, while the descriptive approach is a research method that attempts to describe and interpret conditions according to what they are.
Pertanggungjawaban Masyarakat Penerima Manfaat Kerugian Negara Dampak Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Tike Murti Sari Dewi; Tengku Mega Rahmadini; Mumaddun Khaerudin Salami; Tengku Arif Hidayat
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 14 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30652/jih.14.2.1-17

Abstract

Pertanggungjawaban pidana merupakan pilar utama dalam hukum pidana yang memastikan bahwa hanya mereka yang memiliki kesalahan dapat dijatuhi pidana. Dalam perkara korupsi, diskursus pertanggungjawaban pidana biasanya difokuskan pada pelaku langsung atau pihak yang turut serta melakukan tindak pidana. Namun, Putusan Pengadilan Tipikor dalam perkara Jabiat Sagala menampilkan perspektif berbeda dengan menyatakan bahwa masyarakat penerima manfaat dari kerugian negara turut bertanggung jawab. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji pertimbangan hukum tersebut dari perspektif asas dan doktrin hukum pidana. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan mengacu pada doktrin hukum pidana, asas geen straf zonder schuld, serta literatur hukum yang relevan. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa pandangan hakim tersebut menimbulkan implikasi penting terhadap perluasan subjek pertanggungjawaban pidana, namun juga mengandung risiko pelanggaran asas legalitas jika tidak dibatasi secara tegas. Artikel ini menawarkan evaluasi kritis terhadap kemungkinan penerapan konsep ini di masa depan, sekaligus memberikan rekomendasi agar prinsip- prinsip dasar hukum pidana tetap terjaga.