Sebastian Alboen Sihombing
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Eksistensi Pengadilan Perikanan dalam Mengadili Perkara Tindak Pidana Perikanan di Indonesia Irwandi Syahputra; Endri; Eki Darmawan; Heni Widiyani; Tike Murti Sari Dewi; Sebastian Alboen Sihombing
Riau Law Journal Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30652/rlj.8.2.192-223

Abstract

As long as a fisheries court other than the fisheries court has not been established, criminal cases in the fisheries sector that occur outside the jurisdiction of the fisheries court will still be examined, tried and decided by the competent district court. Such provisions create a dualism in the legal regime, namely the legal regime of the district court and the regime fisheries court law. With the examination of criminal acts in the fisheries sector carried out by the fisheries courts and district courts, there is dualism and legal uncertainty in the handling of fisheries crimes. Several formal laws are specifically regulated in the Fisheries Law, namely the existence of Ad Hoc Judges, Trials without the Presence of the Defendant (In Absentia), Periods of Court Decisions, Determinations and Detention Periods by Judges and Registrars. Fisheries Courts that have been established have made a major contribution in law enforcement, all established fisheries courts have issued several decisions on fisheries cases. The implementation of administrative sanctions in the implementation of the Job Creation Law also affects the existence of fisheries courts in adjudicating fisheries criminal cases. For fisheries crimes committed in the ZEEI region by foreign vessels, the criminal sanctions contained in the Fisheries Law are still applie
Problematika Pendanaan Aset Danantara terhadap Rencana Investasi Negara Sebastian Alboen Sihombing; Reva Setianingsih; God Godsent; Urai Vidia
Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Juli : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/hukum.v2i4.464

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of funding sourced from Danantara—a digital platform that manages state investment with funding support from state-owned bank customers—in supporting the acceleration of national development. In the context of state investment, collaboration between the Investment Management Institution (LPI) and state-owned financial institutions is important as a form of fiscal innovation and expansion of non-APBN financing sources. The method used is a qualitative descriptive approach with literature studies from various scientific journals and related laws and regulations. The results of the study show that Danantara has the potential to be a reliable, flexible, and sustainable long-term funding instrument. Through funds collected from state-owned bank customers, state investment can be focused on strategic sectors such as infrastructure, energy, and digitalization. However, its effectiveness is still faced with regulatory challenges, transparency of governance, and public literacy regarding state investment mechanisms. For this reason, it is necessary to strengthen regulations and synergy between financial institutions, as well as increase public trust so that Danantara can function optimally as the main supporter in realizing fiscal independence and national economic growth.
Dampak Penyunatan Takaran Minyak Goreng Kita terhadap Kepercayaan Masyarakat dan Upaya Perlindungan Konsumen: Studi Kasus PT. Artha Eka Global Asia Sebastian Alboen Sihombing; Reva Setianingsih; God Godsent; Urai Vidia
Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Juli : Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/mahkamah.v2i3.897

Abstract

Legal protection for consumers is an important issue in maintaining public trust in products circulating in the market, especially in subsidized cooking oil products. Decreasing quality or cutting product content can affect consumer perception, which has an impact on decreasing trust in the product brand. This study aims to analyze the impact of legal protection on the consequences of cutting subsidized cooking oil and how this incident affects public trust. The research method used is a qualitative approach with a case study analysis of the event of cutting the contents of cooking oil products by PT AEGA. The results of the study indicate that non-compliance with product quality standards can cause consumer distrust and worsen the brand image that has been identified with the government subsidy program. Therefore, it is important for the government and business actors to increase transparency, supervision, and law enforcement so that the public does not feel disadvantaged and continues to trust the products they consume. This study also recommends strengthening regulations and legal counseling to the public to increase their awareness and participation in consumer protection.