Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Navigating the Post-ETF Paradigm: An Integrative Multi-Factor Model for Projecting Bitcoin's 2025 Market Cycle Apex Abdul Malik; Ahmad Badruddin; Mary-Jane Wood; Sonia Vernanda; Gladys Putri; Ifah Shandy; Darlene Sitorus; Delia Tamim
Enigma in Economics Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Enigma in Economics
Publisher : Enigma Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61996/economy.v3i1.91

Abstract

Bitcoin’s market structure underwent a fundamental and irreversible transformation following the 2024 regulatory approval and launch of spot Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) in the United States. This event catalyzed an unprecedented wave of institutional adoption, signaling the asset's maturation from a fringe, retail-driven speculative vehicle into an emergent institutional-grade macro-asset. This study moves beyond traditional cyclical models, which are predicated on historical, pre-institutional market dynamics, to analyze Bitcoin's valuation within this profoundly evolved landscape. The primary objective is to project the potential price apex for Bitcoin in the 2024-2025 market cycle by developing and applying a transparent, replicable, and comprehensive multi-factor analytical framework. A multi-factorial, longitudinal analysis was conducted using a combination of publicly available data and simulated datasets from Q1 2022 to Q2 2025. The model is built upon a structured, semi-quantitative framework designed to synthesize three core analytical pillars: (1) Macroeconomic Environment, quantitatively assessing the impact of Federal Reserve interest rate policy, US Dollar Index (DXY) dynamics, and inflation trends through correlation analysis and sensitivity modeling. (2) On-Chain Intelligence, utilizing a suite of metrics from primary sources like Glassnode, including MVRV Z-Score, LTH-SOPR, and Illiquid Supply growth, while critically evaluating the continued validity of their historical thresholds. (3) Market & Flow Dynamics, which integrates technical analysis with a rigorous, quantitative assessment of spot ETF demand versus daily new supply, moving beyond subjective interpretations of price charts. A transparent weighting rubric was developed to integrate the findings from each pillar, mitigating subjective bias and ensuring the analytical synthesis is replicable. The synthesis of the model's components revealed a powerful confluence of bullish factors projected to intensify through late 2024 and into 2025. The Macroeconomic pillar scored moderately positive, forecasting a probable shift to monetary easing. The On-Chain pillar registered a strongly positive score, driven by a profound and persistent supply shock, evidenced by record illiquid supply growth and sustained exchange outflows, indicating strong holder conviction. The Market & Flow Dynamics pillar also scored strongly positive, with institutional demand via ETFs consistently outstripping newly mined supply by a significant multiple. The model's base-case scenario, derived from the weighted synthesis of these pillars, projects a Bitcoin price apex in the range of $150,000 to $200,000, with the most probable timing for this peak occurring between Q4 2024 and Q2 2025. In conclusion, the findings indicate that the 2024-2025 Bitcoin market cycle is fundamentally distinct from its predecessors, primarily driven by a structural, institutional-led demand shock that interacts with, and is amplified by, traditional macroeconomic tailwinds and established cyclical patterns. The projected price apex reflects a market structure that has matured, with future cycles likely to be more influenced by global liquidity conditions than the halving event alone. This research provides a robust, transparent, and theoretically grounded framework for valuing Bitcoin in its new role within the global financial system and offers a template for future analysis of digital assets as they integrate with traditional finance.
Toxic Sublime: The Spectacle of Ecological Collapse in Contemporary Art Gladys Putri; Bimala Putri; Henrietta Noir; Jujuk Maryati
Enigma in Cultural Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Enigma in Cultural
Publisher : Enigma Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61996/cultural.v3i2.108

Abstract

In the era of the Anthropocene, a significant genre of contemporary art has emerged that engages with ecological collapse by rendering environmental devastation visually captivating. This phenomenon, which this paper terms the "toxic sublime," presents a critical paradox: the aestheticization of catastrophe. This study investigates the visual and discursive strategies used by contemporary artists to represent ecological ruin and explores the complex ethical, political, and socio-economic implications of this practice. This study employed a qualitative, multi-modal critical approach. A purposively selected corpus of significant art projects created between 2015 and 2025 that address ecological degradation served as the primary data. The analytical methods included a visual semiotic analysis, operationalizing concepts from Barthes and Peirce to decode the aesthetic language of the artworks, and a Faircloughian critical discourse analysis of associated artist statements, interviews, and reviews. A heuristic modeling exercise, using a composite case study developed from real-world data, was also employed not to validate findings but to explore the generative logic of this aesthetic mode in a controlled, hypothetical context. The analysis identified a consistent taxonomy of aesthetic strategies central to the toxic sublime: 1) the strategic use of unnatural, hyper-saturated color to signify contamination; 2) the deployment of monumental scale to evoke awe and abstraction; and 3) the use of contaminated or synthetic materials as the artistic medium. The discourse analysis revealed a dominant framing of the artist as a "witness" or "alchemist" and the artwork as a "beautiful warning", which functions to legitimize the aestheticization process. In conclusion, the aestheticization of ecological collapse functions as a profoundly ambivalent cultural phenomenon. While it effectively captures attention, it risks neutralizing political urgency by transforming catastrophe into a consumable aesthetic object-a spectacle of decay. This study concludes that the toxic sublime is a defining aesthetic of the Anthropocene, but one that operates within the logic of the art market and the society of the spectacle. Its beautiful forms demand critical vigilance regarding art's complex role in an age of planetary crisis.
A Vicious Cycle: Probable Psychological Distress and Maladaptive Cognition as Barriers to Remediation Among Indonesian Medical Students Failing National Licensure Gladys Putri; Mary-Jane Wood; Zahra Amir; Novalika Kurnia
Scientia Psychiatrica Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Scientia Psychiatrica
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/scipsy.v6i2.193

Abstract

Introduction: Failure on high-stakes medical licensing examinations, such as the Indonesian Medical Doctor Competency Examination (UKMPPD), is a significant stressor. This study aims to delineate the current psychological profile of "repeat takers" (students who have failed at least once) to understand the psychological state associated with being in a cycle of academic failure. Methods: A multi-center, matched case-control study was conducted with 300 participants from five Indonesian medical faculties. The 'Case' group (n=150), recruited from remedial preparation courses, comprised students who had failed the UKMPPD at least once. The 'Control' group (n=150) consisted of peers from the same cohort who passed on their first attempt, matched for university, age, and gender. Psychological variables were measured cross-sectionally using the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC 10), the Brief COPE inventory, and the Self-Reporting Questionnaire-20 (SRQ-20) to screen for probable psychological distress. Results: Cases demonstrated a dramatically higher rate of probable psychological distress, with 62.0% of cases screening positive (SRQ-20 score ≥ 8) compared to 18.0% of controls (p < 0.001). Cases also reported significantly lower current resilience (Mean ± SD: 28.5 ± 5.4 vs. 34.1 ± 4.8, p < 0.001) and significantly greater use of avoidant/maladaptive coping (p < 0.001), driven specifically by Self-Blame (p < 0.001) and Behavioral Disengagement (p < 0.001). Binary logistic regression revealed that factors strongly associated with repeat-taker status included probable psychological distress (OR 5.2, 95% CI 3.1-8.7), lower resilience (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.91), and Self-Blame (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.4-3.2). Conclusion: The psychological state following licensure failure is characterized by a triad of high psychological distress, eroded resilience, and a reliance on self-blaming cognitive distortions. This profile, most parsimoniously interpreted as a consequence of initial failure, constitutes a formidable state of crisis and a critical barrier to successful academic remediation.