Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

RETORIKA DAN TEKNIK DEBAT POLITIK Marzuki Marzuki; Alwi Hadad; Dinda Ratulangi
JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Agustus
Publisher : CV. KAMPUS AKADEMIK PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jmia.v2i4.5689

Abstract

Political debates are one of the main instruments of democracy, serving as a platform for candidates to present their ideas and for the public to assess the credibility and capabilities of potential leaders. Rhetoric plays a key role in political debates, with the three main elements of Aristotle’s theory—ethos, pathos, and logos—forming the foundation of effective political communication. Ethos emphasizes the speaker's credibility, pathos appeals to the audience’s emotions, and logos relates to arguments based on logic and facts. However, in practice, many candidates use manipulative rhetorical techniques such as logical fallacies, including straw man argument, false dilemma, and ad hominem, which can mislead public opinion. This study employs a qualitative descriptive approach with content analysis of the 2024 presidential election debates to identify the use of rhetorical techniques in political debates. The findings reveal that effective rhetoric can enhance a candidate’s electability and shape public perception, while manipulative rhetoric can create polarization in society. Therefore, strong political literacy is necessary for the public to analyze debates objectively and avoid being influenced by manipulative techniques.  
Analisis Sekularisme Dan Negara-Negara Muslim Kamila, Nayla Putri; Marzuki, Marzuki; Syahrina Suhilah Siregar; Juniyanti Siagian; Alwi Hadad; Muhammad Albani; Reyza Dian Isnaini; Dinda Ratulangi
PESHUM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 1: Desember 2024
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/peshum.v4i1.6887

Abstract

Pemisahan pertimbangan agama dari kehidupan komunal dan segala hal yang terkait dengan pemerintahan biasanya disebut sebagai sekularisme. Islamisme dan sekularisme sering digunakan secara bergantian, dengan kaum sekuler biasanya menentang Islam dalam hal politik dan cita-cita sosial. Studi ini menggunakan metodologi deskriptif kualitatif, di mana data yang dikumpulkan kemudian dijelaskan untuk memudahkan pemahaman. Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk menggambarkan, merangkum, dan menjelaskan keadaan terkini mengenai sekularisme dan negara-negara Muslim. Penelitian ini menggambarkan bagaimana sistem sekuler diterapkan di negara-negara Muslim, termasuk Turki, Mesir, Indonesia, dan lainnya, serta dampak sekularisme terhadap negara-negara tersebut.
Moderasi Beragama dalam Pandangan Islam Ditinjau dari Kejelasan Nash Al-Quran dan Hadis Harahap, Salahuddin; Thorieq Al Abdu; Andre Selamat Sinaga; Fikri Dwi Septian; Reyza Dian Isnaini; Muhammad Albani; Alwi Hadad; Mhd Wildan Arifin Baturara; Wahyu Septiawan; Mara Ganti Nasution; Muhammad Farhan Ramadhan
PESHUM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 2: Februari 2025
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/peshum.v4i2.7357

Abstract

Moderation, or wasatiyyah, is an important principle taught in Islam, prioritizing balance and justice in worship and social interaction. This study uses a qualitative approach with a literature study method as the basis for analysis. In this context, data is collected from a variety of sources, including Qur'án nash, hadith, as well as relevant academic literature. Through the analysis of Qur'án texts and hadiths, this article identifies the values that support a moderate attitude, including the importance of tolerance, understanding, and justice. This research also examines the practical application of the principle of moderation in the context of the daily life of Muslims, as well as the challenges faced in promoting these values in the midst of the times. The results of this study are expected to provide deeper insights into the relevance of moderation in strengthening community solidarity and preventing extremism.