Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.92
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Shar-E: Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Hukum Syariah TEKSTUR : Jurnal Teknologi Infrastruktur Priviet Social Sciences Journal Journal of Innovative and Creativity
Serera, Aulia Yuti
Unknown Affiliation
Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
IMPLEMENTASI PRINSIP KONSTITUSIONAL DALAM REGULASI KEAMANAN STRUKTURAL BANGUNAN GEDUNG: KAJIAN YURIDIS, NORMATIF, DAN TEKNIS Parabi, Ashraf Dhowian; Aisyah, Siti; Serera, Aulia Yuti; Yuliana; Mukti, Plasma Versiana; Octaviyana, Rickhy Artha
Jurnal Teknologi Infrastruktur Vol 7 No 1 (2025): Jurnal Teknologi Infrastruktur Vol 7 Nomor 1 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Teknik Universitas Panca Bhakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study critically analyzes the implementation of constitutional principles within the framework of structural safety regulations for building constructions in Indonesia. The intersection between constitutional law and civil engineering becomes urgent to analyze considering the significant transformation of building construction regulations following the enactment of the Job Creation Law (Law No. 11 of 2020) and Government Regulation No. 16 of 2021. The study employs a normative juridical approach integrated with technical analysis through doctrinal legal research methods while still considering empirical aspects of structural safety standards. Through legislative, conceptual, and comparative approaches, this study identifies significant implementation gaps between constitutional principles and structural safety technical standards. The results indicate that: (1) there is disharmony between constitutional principles and the implementation of technical regulations, especially in the aspect of protecting citizens' human rights; (2) the paradigm shift from Building Permit (IMB) to Building Approval (PBG) has not fully accommodated the fulfillment of constitutional rights of building users; and (3) the state's constitutional accountability mechanism in building failures remains weak. The study recommends reformulating structural safety regulations that integrate constitutional principles with technical standards by strengthening the state's responsibility dimension in ensuring building safety, as well as improving the Building Feasibility Certificate (SLF) mechanism as a constitutional protection instrument. Keywords: Building construction, normative juridical study, job creation law
Integrasi Prinsip Hukum Humaniter Internasional Dalam Penguatan Kapabilitas Pertahanan Dan Strategi Keamanan Maritim Di Wilayah Perbatasan Natuna Dan Tanjung Datu Anhari, Radifan; Serera, Aulia Yuti; Azzaulfa, Annisa; Riandy, Ervin
Journal of Innovative and Creativity Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Permasalahan perbatasan maritim Indonesia, khususnya di Natuna dan Tanjung Datu, tidak hanya menyangkut delimitasi wilayah dan eksploitasi sumber daya, tetapi juga pertahanan dan keamanan yang terkait Hukum Humaniter Internasional. Operasi pengamanan laut harus memperhatikan asas proportionality, necessity, dan protection of civilians. Koordinasi antar-institusi, modernisasi armada, sistem pemantauan maritim, dan diplomasi hukum menjadi penting untuk mencegah eskalasi konflik, melindungi warga sipil, dan menjaga stabilitas kawasan secara hukum internasional. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif untuk menelaah penerapan prinsip Hukum Humaniter Internasional dalam kebijakan pertahanan maritim Indonesia di Natuna dan Tanjung Datu. Fokus pada batasan penggunaan kekuatan militer dan perlindungan warga sipil. Analisis dilakukan melalui studi perundang-undangan, literatur, dan publikasi resmi internasional, serta dianalisis secara deskriptif-analitis dan interpretatif-normatif untuk menilai kesesuaian kebijakan pertahanan dengan Hukum Humaniter Internasional. Hasil penelitian ini, Penerapan prinsip Hukum Humaniter Internasional di Natuna dan Tanjung Datu menekankan diskriminasi, proporsionalitas, dan perlindungan warga sipil, sehingga operasi militer hanya menarget sasaran sah. Aparat menggunakan patroli gabungan, teknologi pengawasan, dan koordinasi dengan masyarakat serta negara tetangga. HHI membatasi penggunaan kekuatan militer dengan menekankan tindakan preventif, proporsional, dan koordinatif, didukung modernisasi sarana, pelatihan gabungan, dan sistem komando terpadu. Penerapan asas HHI memperkuat kebijakan pertahanan melalui pengawasan teknologi, kerja sama lintas lembaga, keterlibatan masyarakat, dan kolaborasi bilateral, menjaga stabilitas wilayah, perlindungan warga sipil, dan efektivitas pertahanan secara berkelanjutan
Tinjauan Yuridis Pengenaan Sanksi Kurungan Pengganti Denda bagi Pelaku IUU Fishing di ZEE Indonesia Riandy, Ervin; Pustika, Anna Anindita Nur; Christmas, Sandy Kurnia; Serera, Aulia Yuti
Shar-E : Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Hukum Syariah Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Shar-E : Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Hukum Syariah
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37567/shar-e.v12i1.4704

Abstract

The problem regarding the interpretation of the meaning of imprisonment and corporal punishment as stated in Article 73 paragraph (3) of UNCLOS 1982 has caused differences in judges' decisions against perpetrators of IUU Fishing in the Indonesian Exclusive Economic Zone (ZEEI). On the one hand, there are courts that explain that confinement in lieu of a fine is contrary to UNCLOS 1982, while on the other hand it is said that it does not violate UNCLOS 1982. This study was conducted to provide a legal study of whether the imposition of confinement in lieu of a fine on perpetrators of IUU Fishing in ZEEI. The results of this study, namely according to the interpretation of grammatical and the meaning of words/terms (taalkundige interpretation) and the explanation of legal experts, can be concluded that imprisonment and confinement (including confinement in lieu of a fine) are included in the scope of the prohibition of Article 73 paragraph (3) of UNCLOS 1982, because this punishment eliminates a person's freedom. Courts in Indonesia should be consistent not implementing imprisonment and corporal punishment considering that Indonesia has ratified UNCLOS 1982 and is bound by the principle of pacta sunt servanda. This paper provides proposals to amend the Fisheries Law and Judges are also encouraged to make independent legal discoveries to create substitute criminal sanctions for fines that do not conflict with UNCLOS 1982.
The role of the International Organization for Migration (IOM) in upholding refugee rights in Indonesia based on the implementation of the 1951 refugee convention and the 1967 protocol Azzaulfa, Anisa; Serera, Aulia Yuti
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): January 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i1.1242

Abstract

Forced migration is a global issue that poses challenging legal challenges. Under Presidential Regulation No. 125 of 2016, Indonesia provides refugees with temporary protection, even though it has not joined the 1951 Refugee Convention or the 1967 Protocol. Even while the rule protects them, the legal framework restricts their ability to earn a living by prohibiting them from working, leaving them vulnerable and reliant on outside assistance. By contrasting its actions with the tenets of international refugee law, this paper investigates the role of the International Organization for Migration (IOM) in protecting refugee rights in Indonesia. The methodology is a normative-empirical legal approach that analyzes both the applicable legal instruments and the IOM’s factual practices based on official reports. The findings indicate that to bridge the gap created by the legal restriction on working, the IOM provides a monthly Cash-Based Intervention (CBI) allowance to support basic sustenance and align with the spirit of Article 23 of the Convention. Furthermore, the IOM covers tuition and supplies for refugees’ education, adhering to the standard set by Article 22 of the Convention. The IOM provides comprehensive insurance for healthcare, covering hospitalization, mental health, and reproductive health. These healthcare provisions fulfill the obligations outlined in Article 24. In conclusion, the IOM’s humanitarian interventions, specifically the provision of financial aid, education, and healthcare, are crucial in mitigating the acute vulnerabilities of refugees in Indonesia. These initiatives demonstrate a pragmatic dedication to maintaining social welfare norms and basic human rights in accordance with the 1951 Refugee Convention and the 1967 Protocol.
The 1961 vienna convention implementations on eradicating structural discrimination of diplomatic corps towards the protection of female diplomats rights Serera, Aulia Yuti; Azzaulfa, Anisa; Anhari, Radifan; Riandy, Ervin
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): January 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i1.1281

Abstract

The role of female diplomats on the international stage has increased significantly over the last two decades. However, the role of female diplomats remains limited in some areas, such as human rights, international peace, and climate change. They also play a limited role as negotiators, facilitators, and policy designers. This condition leads to the structural discrimination faced by female diplomats. The 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (VCDR) was formulated to grant all diplomats, including female diplomats, the protection of diplomatic functions and the official status of diplomats. This research adopts a normative-empirical approach to analyze how the implementation of the 1961 VCDR eradicates the structural discrimination of the diplomatic corps towards the protection of the rights of female diplomats. The research findings show that women’s involvement in diplomacy still faces a significant gap in terms of numbers and levels assigned. Female diplomats also face the risk of gender violation and harassment. The 1961 VCDR was formulated as a gender-neutral foundation for diplomatic protection, which means it lacks specific provisions on gender-based discrimination or violence. Consequently, addressing issues such as unequal postings and promotions heavily relies on national policies, labor laws, and international human rights instruments such as CEDAW, rather than the 1961 VCDR directly. The empowerment of female diplomats requires a multi-faceted approach involving both normative efforts and structural reforms.
Co-Authors Anhari, Radifan Azzaulfa, Anisa Azzaulfa, Annisa Mukti, Plasma Versiana NIM. A1011141008, YULIANA Octaviyana, Rickhy Artha Parabi, Ashraf Dhowian Pustika, Anna Anindita Nur Riandy, Ervin Sandy Kurnia Christmas Siti Aisyah