Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia PALAR (Pakuan Law review) JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Jurnal Sosial dan Sains
Maukar, Michelle Regine
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Astronomy Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Superstar Fitness' Default Dispute for Negligence in Contract Agreement Gani, Maria Minerva; Lauren, Callista; Maukar, Michelle Regine
JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Vol 7, No 2 (2025): JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/jihad.v7i2.8645

Abstract

The dispute case between PT Cipta Usaha Amerta Nusantara and its creditors reveals the complexity of default in the implementation of the interior construction service contract. This research aims to analyze (1) the legal position of contract agreements in bankruptcy cases, (2) the application of the concept of debt as a form of default in treaty law, and (3) the legal possibilities that creditors have to recover their rights in the form of compensation, interest, or costs. The research method used is normative legal method with prescriptive and hermeneutic approaches. The decision of the Commercial Court at the Central Jakarta District Court shows that the bankruptcy petition cannot be granted because the minimum requirement of two legitimate creditors is not met. Nevertheless, the respondent's negligence in fulfilling its payment obligations towards the applicant and other parties, both employees and customers, showed a clear default. This research also reveals that creditors have a strong legal basis to demand the fulfillment of rights through default lawsuits and bankruptcy if the formal requirements are met. Therefore, more careful contract management and an adequate company financial monitoring system are required to avoid widespread losses for the parties involved.
The Offense Between Negligence of the State Civil Apparatus and the Criminal Act Of Forgery Of Letters In Making Certificates Of Ownership Rights Budianto, Agus; Nugraha, Dwi Putra; Minerva, Maria; Maukar, Michelle Regine; Laure, Callista; Vandini, Tia
PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Vol 11, No 2 (2025): Volume 11, Nomor 2 April-June 2025
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PAKUAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33751/palar.v11i2.11746

Abstract

Abstract  The State Civil Apparatus (ASN) is a profession in government agencies responsible for providing public services based on good governance principles. However, the actual delivery of these services may not always meet public expectations. Maladministration, including negligence, abuse of authority, and neglect of legal obligations, can create opportunities for criminal acts, such as forgery of letters. This research focuses on the correlation between ASN negligence and the crime of letter forgery in the issuance of certificates of ownership. Through a qualitative approach and case study, the study reveals that deviations from the principles of good governance by ASN could be contributing factors to document forgery. Document forgery reflects the elements of an unlawful act and malicious intent. Despite the availability of legal measures in Indonesia, weak supervision and integrity of human resources hinder prevention and prosecution. The study also examines criminal law in India and the Netherlands to assess the Indonesian legal system. Keywords: Maladministration, Forgery, Comparative Criminal Law
Implikasi Hukum Batalnya Perjanjian Nominee:Perbandingan Konskuensi PMH dalam Sengketa Properti Eigendom di Indonesia dan Belanda Maukar, Michelle Regine; Huberta, Grace Amaze; Leos, Meirate; Fewsan, Kimberly; Tirta , Marcell
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v10i11.62446

Abstract

This research focuses on the comparative aspects between Indonesia and the Netherlands in facing the challenges of illegal acts committed by foreign nationals. A nominee agreement is an agreement that illegally sells or lends the identity of a local citizen, which can benefit both parties, especially foreign nationals who can purchase assets in the form of land in a country. Nominee agreements or borrowing names in property or land ownership in Indonesia are included as Unlawful Acts (PMH) under Article 1365 of the Civil Code. This is because such actions are considered legal smuggling that has the aim of avoiding or violating the Basic Agrarian Law, particularly the Principle of Nationality. If nominee agreements continue to be normalized, the economy and land in a country could be threatened by illegal ownership owned by foreign nationals. Using normative legal research methods, this research uses cross-country comparisons of regulations, rules, and how governments respond to the process of illegal identity lending.
Tinjauan Kritis Hukum Pembuktian dalam Yurisdiksi Militer : Analisis Kekuatan Alat Bukti Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor : 29-K/PM.III-14/AD/IX/2025). Maukar, Michelle Regine; Huberta, Grace Amaze; Fewsan, Kimberly; Bintang, Andreas; Michelin, Darrel
Jurnal sosial dan sains Vol. 5 No. 11 (2025): Jurnal Sosial dan Sains
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/jurnalsosains.v5i11.32580

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas pentingnya penerapan hukum pembuktian dalam yurisdiksi militer, khususnya pada kasus pembunuhan yang dilakukan oleh 10 prajurit TNI AD (Batalyon Infanteri) kepada seorang warga sipil di Denpasar, Bali. Kasus ini telah terdaftar dalam Pengadilan Militer Nomor : 29-K/PM.III-14/AD/IX/2025. Pemicu permasalahan ini berawal ketika korban menyalahgunakan kepercayaan temannya yang termasuk salah satu prajurit tersebut. Tujuan penelitian ini berfokus pada proses pembuktian, penggunaan alat bukti, sampai pertimbangan hakim yang didasari atas kekuatan alat bukti yang dipakai. Kemudian, penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan kasus (case approach) serta didasari dengan perundang-undangan (statute apporach). Hasil penelitian ini ingin menunjukan bahwa Oditur Militer sebagai pihak penuntut (actori in cumbit probatio) berhasil membuktikan unsur-unsur tindak pidana berdasarkan minimal dua alat bukti yang sah yaitu dengan Visum Et Repertum (VER) dan alat bukti berupa alat penyiksaan sampai komunikasi digital. Namun, terdapat tantangan signifikan dalam pembuktian unsur penyertaan (deelneming) terhadap 10 pelaku secara kolektif. Secara yuridis, penerapan asas negatief wettelijk bewijs telah dipenuhi. Namun, temuan ini menggarisbawahi perlunya tinjauan ulang terhadap konsistensi pertimbangan hakim dalam menjamin rasa keadilan bagi korban sipil yang diadili di lingkungan militer. Disimpulkan bahwa akuntabilitas peradilan militer dalam menangani kasus tindak pidana umum membutuhkan harmonisasi hukum acara untuk memperkuat perlindungan hukum bagi warga sipil.
Co-Authors Agus Budianto Bintang, Andreas Dwi Putra Nugraha Fewsan, Kimberly Gani, Maria Minerva Huberta, Grace Amaze Laure, Callista Lauren, Callista Leos, Meirate Michelin, Darrel Minerva, Maria Tirta , Marcell Vandini, Tia