Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Negara Singapura Dan Hukum Pidana Indonesia Mengenai Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana Riqa Kurnia Sabilla; Aurellya Ramadhani Syainda Putri; Yudi Anugrah Pratama; Muhammad Akbar Dzakira; Asep Suherman
Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): April - Juni
Publisher : GLOBAL SCIENTS PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Criminal law is a set of regulations aimed at preventing criminal acts by deterring individuals from committing offenses. In the field of comparative criminal law, the study of its object focuses on analyzing criminal law disciplines to gain a deeper understanding of investigative methods and legal procedures. One example of comparative criminal law can be seen in the study of premeditated murder offenses in Indonesia and Singapore, which share similarities and differences in their legal systems. This discussion focuses on two main aspects: the application of sanctions for premeditated murder based on Indonesian criminal law (Article 340 of the Criminal Code) and Singaporean criminal law (Penal Code Act 224), as well as an analysis of the similarities and differences in the systematic approach of both regulations.This research employs a normative juridical approach with a descriptive-analytical nature, relying on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. In Singapore, premeditated murder is regulated under Section 300 of the Penal Code Act 224, which imposes the death penalty. Meanwhile, in Indonesia, premeditated murder is stipulated in Article 340 of the Criminal Code, which provides sanctions in the form of the death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment for a maximum term of 20 years.In general, Indonesia and Singapore have distinct legal systems. However, regarding the regulation of premeditated murder, both countries share similarities in legal provisions, while differences exist in terms of legal subjects and the application of sanctions.
Pendekatan Follow The Money Sebagai Instrumen Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Korupsi Dan Pencucian Uang Nurrurachman, Kevin; Syadid Jiddan Alharun; Agrez Aprianti; Riqa Kurnia Sabilla; Kiki Amaliah
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Juli - Desember
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/tgt5cy94

Abstract

This scientific work juridically analyzes the position and role of the Follow the Money (FTM) methodology as a vital instrument in proving cases of Corruption (Tipikor) subsequently linked to Money Laundering Crimes (TPPU). FTM is understood as an investigative paradigm that traces the movement of assets derived from crime, which is key to separating the predicate crime (corruption) from the subsequent offense (money laundering). The central issue investigated is how the normative provisions in Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning TPPU provide the legal basis for FTM, particularly through the mechanism of reverse burden of proof and asset forfeiture. Using a normative legal research method, this study highlights implementation barriers of FTM, such as the complexity of penetrating bank secrecy and the need for data synchronization among law enforcement agencies. The findings indicate that FTM is a legal necessity, but its effectiveness highly depends on strengthening the synergy between the Prosecutor's Office, Police, and PPATK, and the progressive application of law to achieve maximum state loss recovery.