Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik
Syadid Jiddan Alharun
Unknown Affiliation
Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Pendekatan Follow The Money Sebagai Instrumen Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Korupsi Dan Pencucian Uang Nurrurachman, Kevin; Syadid Jiddan Alharun; Agrez Aprianti; Riqa Kurnia Sabilla; Kiki Amaliah
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Juli - Desember
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/tgt5cy94

Abstract

This scientific work juridically analyzes the position and role of the Follow the Money (FTM) methodology as a vital instrument in proving cases of Corruption (Tipikor) subsequently linked to Money Laundering Crimes (TPPU). FTM is understood as an investigative paradigm that traces the movement of assets derived from crime, which is key to separating the predicate crime (corruption) from the subsequent offense (money laundering). The central issue investigated is how the normative provisions in Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning TPPU provide the legal basis for FTM, particularly through the mechanism of reverse burden of proof and asset forfeiture. Using a normative legal research method, this study highlights implementation barriers of FTM, such as the complexity of penetrating bank secrecy and the need for data synchronization among law enforcement agencies. The findings indicate that FTM is a legal necessity, but its effectiveness highly depends on strengthening the synergy between the Prosecutor's Office, Police, and PPATK, and the progressive application of law to achieve maximum state loss recovery.
Telaah Normatif Kedudukan Dan Kekuatan Pembuktian Tes Deoxyribonucleic Acid Sebagai Alat Bukti Sah Dalam Sistem Pembuktian Hukum Pidana Nasional Syadid Jiddan Alharun; Tiara Ramadhani; Aldi Prasetiawan Saputra; Aulia Rexana Sitaresmi; Ria Anggraeni Utami
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Juli - Desember
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/c942fe67

Abstract

This research normatively analyzes the position and probative value of Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Testing within the Indonesian criminal procedure law system. The underlying legal issue is the controversy surrounding DNA testing to establish the validity of a biological child, particularly when linked to specific criminal acts such as adultery or defamation. The method employed is juridical-normative, using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach, focusing on a comprehensive review of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) and related criminal provisions. The analysis of Article 184 paragraph (1) of KUHAP indicates that DNA Testing is not explicitly recognized as an evidence, yet it can be categorized as part of Expert Testimony or Documentary Evidence (Visum et Repertum). The probative force of DNA Testing is absolute in determining biological relationships, but within the criminal context, it must comply with the principle of minimum two valid evidence and be supported by the judge's conviction as stipulated in Article 183 of KUHAP. This research concludes that regulatory harmonization is necessary to provide a more specific and stronger standing for DNA Testing, especially in cases involving the determination of identity or biological relationships.
Co-Authors Agrez Aprianti Aldi Prasetiawan Saputra Aulia Rexana Sitaresmi Kiki Amaliah Nurrurachman, Kevin Ria Anggraeni Utami Riqa Kurnia Sabilla Tiara Ramadhani