Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal UNTAG Law Review Journal of Contemporary Law Studies Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice
Adzkia, Nurul
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Pengawasan Internal terhadap Tindakan Koruptif Pejabat Pemerintahan Daerah oleh Aparatur Pengawasan Intern Pemerintahan (Studi Kasus Pemerasan Kepala Dinas Provinsi Bengkulu) Vianka, Tania; Wati, Linda; Adzkia, Nurul; Susanti, Pipi
Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): June
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/ijlj.v2i4.4108

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of internal supervision conducted by the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP), particularly the Regional Inspectorate, in preventing and addressing corruption within local governments. The research uses a normative juridical approach by analyzing laws and regulations, combined with case studies specifically, extortion practices within the Bengkulu Provincial Government. The findings reveal that internal supervision has not functioned optimally. Several factors contribute to this ineffectiveness, including the failure of the internal control system, limited independence of the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP), and insufficient coordination with external oversight bodies. These issues suggest that the current internal supervision mechanism remains vulnerable to political intervention and is inadequate in detecting or preventing structural corruption. In practice, the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) often lacks the authority and resources necessary to carry out thorough and independent investigations, especially in politically sensitive cases. To address these shortcomings, the study recommends a series of reforms. These include strengthening the institutional position and independence of the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP), revising and updating technical regulations related to the Government Internal Control System (SPIP), and enhancing coordination and information-sharing between internal and external supervisory institutions. A more empowered and independent the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) would be better equipped to uphold integrity, transparency, and accountability in local governance. In conclusion, comprehensive improvements in internal supervision are essential to support anti-corruption efforts and ensure good governance at the regional level. Strengthening internal control is not only a legal necessity but also a strategic step toward building public trust in government institutions.
Konstruksi Hukum Pengawasan Internal terhadap Tindakan Koruptif Aparatur Sipil Negara (APIP): Studi Kasus Fee Proyek di Kementerian Pertanian Wati, Linda Rahma; Adzkia, Nurul; Vianka, Tania Putri; Barus, Sonia Ivana; Iskandar, Iskandar
Journal of Contemporary Law Studies Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Agustus
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/lawstudies.v2i4.4093

Abstract

This research examines the legal construction of internal supervision by the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) in tackling corrupt acts committed by the State Civil Apparatus (ASN), with a case study of project fees at the Ministry of Agriculture. Corruption in the bureaucracy, especially through the practice of project fees, shows the weakness of the internal control system, even though it has been regulated in regulations such as Government Regulation Number 60 of 2008 concerning the Government Internal Control System (SPIP) and Government Regulation Number 94 of 2021 concerning Civil Servant Discipline. Through a normative juridical approach and case studies, this research found a gap between legal norms and their implementation. APIP, as the main instrument of supervision, still faces challenges in terms of independence, competence, and adequate structural support. Cases in the Ministry of Agriculture show that supervisory actions are often reactive, not preventive. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the role of APIP through the adoption of integrity audit methodology (probity audit), human resource capacity building, and institutional reform in order to realize effective, independent, and accountable supervision. This research offers legal and institutional recommendations to strengthen clean and integrity governance.
WHEN DIPLOMATS BECOME UNWELCOME: THE INDIA-PAKISTAN 2025 PERSONA NON GRATA Adzkia, Nurul; Pratama, M. Riezky Putra; Adepio, M. Ilham
UNTAG Law Review Vol 9, No 2 (2025): UNTAG Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/ulrev.v9i2.6621

Abstract

The 2025 diplomatic tension between India and Pakistan, culminating in the mutual expulsion of diplomats under persona non grata status following a terrorist attack in Kashmir, highlights the use of diplomatic law as a political tool in strained bilateral relations. This study aims to analyze the regulations concerning persona non grata under the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (VCDR) and their application in the India-Pakistan case. Employing a normative legal research method with a statutory approach, data from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources is descriptively analyzed. The findings reveal that Article 9 of the VCDR grants the receiving state full discretionary authority to expel a diplomat without justification, a right exercised in this instance for political retaliation. Both nations justified their actions by alleging violations of Article 41 of the VCDR, which obligates diplomats to respect the laws of the receiving state. This case demonstrates that diplomatic immunity is not absolute and is subject to national security interests. The implication is that a legally sanctioned persona non grata action can be instrumentalized for political retribution, thereby undermining the very channels essential for communication and peaceful conflict resolution.
Co-Authors Adepio, M. Ilham Barus, Sonia Ivana Iskandar Iskandar Linda Wati Pratama, M. Riezky Putra Susanti, Pipi Vianka, Tania Vianka, Tania Putri Wati, Linda Rahma