Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Analisis Filosofis Efektivitas Sanksi Administratif Berupa Denda Dalam POJK Nomor 3/POJK.04/2021 Terhadap Pelaku Jasa Keuangan Yang Mengalami Kerugian Djayanti, Djayanti; Rasji, Rasji; Defilania, Oktri
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i5.4794

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas tentang efektivitas sanksi administratif berupa denda terhadap pelanggaran pelaporan di sektor pasar modal Indonesia, dengan fokus pada Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (POJK) Nomor 3/POJK.04/2021. Latar belakang penelitian ini menyoroti peran OJK dalam mengatur dan mengawasi kegiatan jasa keuangan untuk mewujudkan sistem keuangan yang adil, transparan, dan akuntabel. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, konsep, dan filsafat hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa efektivitas sanksi denda dipertanyakan karena beberapa faktor, termasuk kondisi keuangan pelanggar dan besarnya nominal sanksi. Studi kasus PT Garuda Indonesia (2018) menggambarkan bahwa sanksi administratif belum memberikan efek jera yang memadai dibandingkan dengan kerugian yang dialami investor. Kesimpulannya, penelitian ini menekankan perlunya mekanisme sanksi yang lebih tegas dan preventif agar dapat meningkatkan kepatuhan pelaku pasar modal dan melindungi kepentingan investor.
Legal Pluralism and Maqāṣid Al-Sharīʿah in Regulating Cooperative Finance under Indonesia’s Financial Services Authority Defilania, Oktri; Gunadi, Ariawan; Rohaya, Nizla; Khutub, Muhammad
Az-Zarqa': Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Islam Vol. 17 No. 1 (2025): Az-Zarqa'
Publisher : Sharia and Law Faculty of Sunan Kalijaga Islamic State University Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/az-zarqa.v17.i1.4344

Abstract

Abstract: The transfer of regulatory authority over financial-service cooperatives to the Financial Services Authority (OJK) through the Financial Sector Development and Strengthening Law (Law No. 4/2023, PPSK Law) represents a paradigm shift in Indonesia’s legal landscape. Cooperatives, historically governed under a separate regime and supervised by the Ministry of Cooperatives and SMEs, are now incorporated into the national financial regulatory system. This article examines the conceptual implications of the reform through a normative juridical method supported by statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Primary legal sources include the PPSK Law, Cooperative Law, Financial Services Authority Law, and OJK Regulation No. 47/2024, while secondary sources comprise scholarly literature, expert opinions, and prior research. The analysis employs three conceptual frameworks: consumer protection theory, Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah in Islamic economic law, and legal pluralism. Findings show that OJK supervision enhances legal certainty, protects members’ financial assets, and aligns cooperative consumer rights with those of bank customers, thereby advancing the Maqāṣid principles of protection of wealth (ḥifẓ al-mā), justice (‘adālah), and balance (tawāzun). Nevertheless, the reform raises concerns about potential erosion of cooperative autonomy and the risk of marginalizing small-scale or community-based cooperatives. These tensions highlight the need for proportional and collaborative regulatory design that accommodates cooperative values while ensuring accountability and stability. The discussion concludes that cooperative supervision under OJK can serve as both a safeguard and a challenge: it strengthens governance but may undermine cooperative identity if implemented rigidly. Future empirical research is recommended to assess the real impact of the reform across regions and cooperative models. Abstrak: Peralihan kewenangan pengawasan koperasi jasa keuangan kepada Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) melalui Undang-Undang Pengembangan dan Penguatan Sektor Keuangan (UU No. 4 Tahun 2023, UU PPSK) merepresentasikan perubahan paradigma dalam lanskap hukum Indonesia. Koperasi, yang secara historis diatur dalam rezim terpisah dan diawasi oleh Kementerian Koperasi dan UKM, kini masuk dalam sistem regulasi keuangan nasional. Artikel ini mengkaji implikasi konseptual dari reformasi tersebut melalui metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan komparatif. Sumber hukum primer mencakup UU PPSK, UU Perkoperasian, UU Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, serta Peraturan OJK No. 47 Tahun 2024, sedangkan sumber sekunder meliputi literatur akademik, pendapat ahli, dan hasil penelitian terdahulu. Analisis dilakukan dengan menggunakan tiga kerangka konseptual: teori perlindungan konsumen, Maqāṣid Asy-Syarīʿah dalam hukum ekonomi Islam, dan pluralisme hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengawasan OJK meningkatkan kepastian hukum, melindungi aset keuangan anggota, serta menyelaraskan hak-hak konsumen koperasi dengan nasabah bank, sehingga memperkuat prinsip maqāṣid berupa ḥifẓ al-māl (perlindungan harta), ʿadālah (keadilan), dan tawāzun (keseimbangan). Namun demikian, reformasi ini juga menimbulkan kekhawatiran terkait potensi terkikisnya otonomi koperasi dan risiko marginalisasi terhadap koperasi kecil berbasis komunitas. Ketegangan ini menegaskan perlunya desain regulasi yang proporsional dan kolaboratif, yang mengakomodasi nilai-nilai koperasi sekaligus menjamin akuntabilitas dan stabilitas. Kajian pada artikel ini menyimpulkan bahwa pengawasan koperasi oleh OJK dapat berfungsi ganda: sebagai instrumen penguatan tata kelola, tetapi juga berpotensi melemahkan identitas koperasi jika diterapkan secara kaku. Penelitian empiris lebih lanjut sangat disarankan untuk menilai dampak nyata reformasi ini di berbagai daerah dan model koperasi.
The Legal Benefits of Islamic Rural Bank Mergers for the Banking Industry Defilania, Oktri; Rasji
Al-Risalah VOLUME 26 NO 1, MAY (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/al-risalah.vi.66473

Abstract

Mergers are a strategic tool widely used by the banking industry to ensure business sustainability, particularly in the face of capital constraints and increasing competitive risks. In the context of Sharia Rural Banks (BPRS), merger policies are not merely business-oriented but also carry significant legal implications for strengthening the structure of the national sharia banking industry. However, legal studies on the benefits of BPRS mergers tend to remain normative and have not yet been systematically analyzed based on the principle of legal utility. This study aims to analyze the legal benefits of BPRS mergers for the banking industry using a utilitarian approach, as well as to identify the legal and institutional challenges arising from the implementation of such mergers. The research method employed is normative legal research using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The legal materials analyzed include laws, regulations issued by the Financial Services Authority, as well as relevant legal doctrines and literature, which are subsequently analyzed qualitatively through deductive reasoning. The research results indicate that BPRS mergers provide concrete legal benefits, including strengthening capital structure, improving bank governance, enhancing the efficiency of supervision by the Financial Services Authority, and increasing customer confidence. Nevertheless, mergers also face challenges such as human resource integration, alignment of work culture, and the risk of short-term profitability decline. This study contributes to enriching the study of Islamic banking law by placing BPRS merger policies within the framework of the legal principle of utility in a more analytical and practical manner.