Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Yustisiabel Risalah Hukum Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Fajrin, Fera Wulandari
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Computer Science & IT Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Reformulasi Pengaturan Subjek Hukum Tippee dalam Sistem Hukum Pasar modal Indonesia Tombi, Johan Tri Noval Hendrian; Larasati, Kandi Kirana; Amri, Ulil; Luthfan, Gusti Fadhil Fithrian; Fajrin, Fera Wulandari; Sanata, Kalen
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v5i4.20403

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis urgensi reformulasi hukum terkait cakupan subjek hukum tippee dalam Undang-Undang Pasar Modal. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dan pendekatan perbandingan hukum. Hasil peneltian ditemukan bahwa regulasi yang ada belum menjangkau dinamika transaksi digital dan pola penyebaran informasi yang kompleks. Studi ini menawarkan pendekatan baru dengan mengadopsi prinsip constructive knowledge dan teori misappropriation untuk memperluas tanggung jawab hukum terhadap pihak yang “seharusnya tahu” mengenai sifat informasi yang diperoleh. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa reformulasi pengaturan hukum terhadap tippee pasif menjadi langkah strategis untuk memperkuat integritas pasar, memperbaiki mekanisme pembuktian, dan mengatasi asimetri informasi dalam praktik insider trading kontemporer. Kata Kunci: Insider Trading, Pasar Modal, Tippee
KEABSAHAN SERANGAN DRONE OLEH RUSIA TERHADAP UKRAINA DI WILAYAH KURSK BERDASARKAN PRINSIP JUS AD BELLUM Kandi Kirana Larasati; Fajrin, Fera Wulandari; Tombi, Johan Tri Noval Hendrian
Jurnal Yustisiabel Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Luwuk

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32529/yustisiabel.v9i1.3931

Abstract

States are legal subjects with international personalities subject to the provisions of international law. However, differences in jurisdiction and interests between states can lead to conflicts that risk disrupting world peace. International Humanitarian Law plays a role in reducing the suffering caused by war by regulating the law in armed conflict, including the Jus Ad Bellum Principle that determines the legality of the use of military force. This legal research is conducted through a statute approach, conceptual approach and case approach. The purpose of this research is to analyze the rules of the use of weapons based on the Jus Ad Bellum Principle and Russia's legal basis in attacking Ukraine in Kursk from the perspective of International Humanitarian Law.
Inkonsistensi Politik Hukum dalam Ratifikasi Perjanjian Internasional di Indonesia Fajrin, Fera Wulandari; Larasati, Kandi Kirana; Jamaluddin, Fitriani
Jurnal Risalah Hukum Vol 21 No 1 (2025): Volume 21, Nomor 1, Juni 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/risalah.V21.i1.1819

Abstract

The legal binding of a country to an internationally agreed treaty to be implemented in the national law of that country is through ratification. The implementation of ratification should be carried out consistently, based on national interests, legal certainty, constitutional mandates, and the welfare of the general public. This research is a normative legal study with an approach through analysis of primary law and the use of secondary law. The results of this study show that in practice, Indonesia demonstrates an inconsistent attitude towards ratifying international agreements, where the Indonesian government can ratify an international agreement quickly if it supports the government's economic or political interests, but delays or even avoids it if it is considered sensitive or puts pressure on its power, even though the agreement concerns public interests such as human rights, the environment, or the livelihood of many people. Thus, there is a need for national legal political reform through regulatory revisions, setting deadlines for ratification, establishing annual priority agendas, mandatory public reporting on delays, and involving civil society and academics. This reform also needs to be supported by the formation of a cross-sector team tasked with overseeing the ratification process in an inclusive and strategic manner
The Limitations of the Principle of State Responsibility in the Global Climate Change Regime Fajrin, Fera Wulandari; Larasati, Kandi Kirana; Tombi, Johan Tri Noval Hendrian; Luthfan, Gusti Fadhil Fithrian
Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law Vol 6 No 3 (2025): Oktober
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/up.v6i3.48698

Abstract

Background: The global climate crisis, driven by increasing carbon emissions, has emerged as one of the most pressing challenges in international law. Despite significant milestones such as the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement, enforcement remains weak due to their reliance on soft law mechanisms. This issue deserves scholarly attention because it raises fundamental questions about state responsibility and the effectiveness of international environmental law in addressing climate change. Methodology: This research employs a doctrinal legal approach combined with a conceptual analysis. This method was selected to critically examine the normative gaps within the texts of international agreements, specifically how "soft law" language undermines enforcement. The study relies on primary legal sources, including the text of the UNFCCC, the Kyoto Protocol, the Paris Agreement, and relevant international jurisprudence such as the ICJ Advisory Opinions. Secondary data is drawn from legal literature, journal articles, and reports on global compliance. The analysis proceeds by interpreting these instruments to determine whether existing frameworks are sufficient to uphold the principle of state responsibility.Objectives: The study aims to evaluate whether existing international legal frameworks adequately enforce the principle of state responsibility in carbon emission reduction. It seeks to identify the limitations of soft law mechanisms, assess their impact on state compliance, and explore potential avenues for strengthening accountability in the global climate regime. Findings: The research reveals that current international agreements lack binding enforcement mechanisms, enabling states to disregard commitments or withdraw without significant legal consequences. While mechanisms such as “naming and shaming” have emerged as alternatives, they primarily exert reputational pressure and remain insufficient to ensure compliance. This gap undermines the principle of state responsibility in practice. Originality/Novelty: The study highlights the urgency of transitioning from soft law to hard enforcement in climate governance. It proposes the establishment of independent enforcement authorities, binding obligations, and strengthened judicial roles, offering innovative insights into how international law can more effectively uphold state responsibility in combating climate change.
Co-Authors Fithrian Luthfan, Gusti Fadhil Jamaluddin, Fitriani Kalen Sanata Irma Suriyani Larasati, Kandi Kirana RR. Ella Evrita Hestiandari Tombi, Johan Tri Noval Hendrian