Putri, Evira Agustina
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Comparative Effectiveness of SGLT2 Inhibitors and GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review Putri, Evira Agustina; Putri, Adinda Wafdani; Andreago; Welliangan, Ariyani Sudhamma; Guantoro, Vincent; Mardiah, Harisa
Medicinus Vol. 14 No. 3 (2025): June
Publisher : Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/med.v14i3.10164

Abstract

Background: Heart failure (HF) affects over 64 million individuals globally and is associated with high morbidity and mortality, particularly in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are emerging therapies with reported cardiovascular benefits. However, their comparative efficacy in HF-specific outcomes remains unclear. This systematic review aimed to assess and compare the safety and efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 RAs in patients with HF. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus up to 1 May 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 RAs in adults with HF. Primary outcomes included all-cause and cardiovascular mortality; secondary outcomes included HF hospitalization and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool and certainty of evidence with the GRADE approach. Result: Fourteen RCTs comprising 30,867 patients (52.2% female; 63.2% with T2DM) were included. SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.78–0.93, p < 0.001, I² = 14%), all-cause mortality (RR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.81–0.95, p = 0.002, I² = 21%), and HF hospitalizations (RR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.67–0.77, p < 0.001, I² = 0%). GLP-1 RAs did not demonstrate significant effects on these outcomes. Overall risk of bias was low to moderate; GRADE certainty ranged from moderate to high. Conclusions: SGLT2 inhibitors provide consistent reductions in mortality and hospitalization in HF patients across glycemic statuses. GLP-1 RAs showed limited benefit in HF-specific outcomes, supporting the preferential use of SGLT2 inhibitors in HF treatment strategies.
The Therapeutic Potential of Neural Stem Cell in Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review Periyanto, Toni; Putri, Evira Agustina; Romano, Sultan Adhitya; Riantiarno, Chairizia; Kamal, M. Aulady Rifki; Aulia, Indri Noer; Sugianto, Michael Aquilar
Medicinus Vol. 14 No. 3 (2025): June
Publisher : Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/med.v14i3.10165

Abstract

Background: Ischemic stroke remains a leading cause of disability and mortality worldwide, with over 12 million new cases annually and limited treatment options confined to narrow therapeutic windows. Neural stem cells (NSCs) have emerged as a promising therapeutic avenue due to their ability to self-renew, differentiate into all neural lineages, and exert paracrine effects that modulate inflammation and promote neurogenesis. Preclinical studies have demonstrated functional improvements of up to 60% in animal stroke models, but a systematic evaluation of these findings is needed to inform future clinical applications. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Databases searched included PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus, covering literature up to May 8, 2025. Inclusion criteria comprised in vivo preclinical studies investigating NSC transplantation in animal models of ischemic stroke with at least one neurological, infarct, or histological outcome. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment (ROBINS-I) were independently performed by three reviewers. Due to study heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis was undertaken. Result: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. NSC therapy improved neurological recovery in over 80% of cases, reduced infarct volume by up to 40%, and downregulated pro-inflammatory and apoptotic markers. Benefits were dose- and timing-dependent, with intracerebral and intravenous routes demonstrating variable efficacy. One study reported tumorigenicity, highlighting the need for safety profiling. Conclusions: Preclinical evidence supports the therapeutic potential of NSCs in ischemic stroke through neuroprotective and neurorestorative mechanisms. High-certainty findings justify continued investigation in clinical trials to refine dosing, delivery, and safety protocols.