Guantoro, Vincent
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Comparative Effectiveness of SGLT2 Inhibitors and GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review Putri, Evira Agustina; Putri, Adinda Wafdani; Andreago; Welliangan, Ariyani Sudhamma; Guantoro, Vincent; Mardiah, Harisa
Medicinus Vol. 14 No. 3 (2025): June
Publisher : Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/med.v14i3.10164

Abstract

Background: Heart failure (HF) affects over 64 million individuals globally and is associated with high morbidity and mortality, particularly in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are emerging therapies with reported cardiovascular benefits. However, their comparative efficacy in HF-specific outcomes remains unclear. This systematic review aimed to assess and compare the safety and efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 RAs in patients with HF. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus up to 1 May 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 RAs in adults with HF. Primary outcomes included all-cause and cardiovascular mortality; secondary outcomes included HF hospitalization and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool and certainty of evidence with the GRADE approach. Result: Fourteen RCTs comprising 30,867 patients (52.2% female; 63.2% with T2DM) were included. SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.78–0.93, p < 0.001, I² = 14%), all-cause mortality (RR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.81–0.95, p = 0.002, I² = 21%), and HF hospitalizations (RR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.67–0.77, p < 0.001, I² = 0%). GLP-1 RAs did not demonstrate significant effects on these outcomes. Overall risk of bias was low to moderate; GRADE certainty ranged from moderate to high. Conclusions: SGLT2 inhibitors provide consistent reductions in mortality and hospitalization in HF patients across glycemic statuses. GLP-1 RAs showed limited benefit in HF-specific outcomes, supporting the preferential use of SGLT2 inhibitors in HF treatment strategies.
Vaccine-Based Immunotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review Amelia, Sesa; Mathlubaa, Asya; Amly, Harzalina Zilfi; Jacobs, Christin Yosefin; Halim, Kurnia; Heriawan, Timotius Ivan; Guantoro, Vincent; Putri, Hesti Andika
Medicinus Vol. 14 No. 3 (2025): June
Publisher : Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/med.v14i3.10166

Abstract

Background: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains a therapeutic challenge, particularly in microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors, which are largely unresponsive to current immunotherapy approaches. Vaccine-based immunotherapy offers a strategy to elicit tumor-specific immune responses in these immunologically “cold” tumors. However, clinical results have been mixed, and the efficacy and safety of cancer vaccines in mCRC remain to be clarified. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating vaccine-based immunotherapy in mCRC were identified from PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus as of May 2, 2025. Eligible studies included human subjects with mCRC receiving vaccine therapy with or without additional treatments, compared to standard or placebo regimens. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); safety was assessed by the incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events. Result: Five RCTs comprising 804 patients met inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis showed a trend toward improved OS with vaccine-based immunotherapy (HR 0.81; 95% CI, 0.65–1.00; p = 0.05; I² = 0%), and a modest, non-significant improvement in PFS (HR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.62–1.05; p = 0.07; I² = 0%). The incidence of severe adverse events was lower with vaccine-based therapies (RR 0.31; 95% CI, 0.02–6.09; p = 0.23; I² = 90%). Conclusions: Vaccine-based immunotherapy in mCRC demonstrates potential clinical benefit, particularly in prolonging survival with a favorable safety profile. Further biomarker-driven studies are needed to optimize patient selection and therapeutic combinations.