Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 16 Documents
Search

Reconstruction of Law Number 12 of 2022 Concerning Criminal Acts of Sexual Violence: The First Milestones in Eliminating Sexual Violence in Indonesia Karso, A. Junaedi
SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 4 No. 8 (2025): SENTRI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Agustus 2025
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/sentri.v4i8.4374

Abstract

The enactment of Law Number 12 of 2022 concerning Criminal Acts of Sexual Violence in harmony with Islam, as stated in the Qur'an, QS. An-Nur verse 33. Prohibiting violence against women also contradicts the values of monotheism, and Al-Insaniyah is a concrete manifestation and gift for women in Indonesia. It has very comprehensive content regulating the classification of criminal acts of sexual violence, physical sexual harassment, forced contraception, forced sterilization, forced marriage, sexual torture, sexual exploitation, sexual slavery, and electronic-based sexual violence. It establishes appropriate penalties and optimizes the prevention and handling of cases of sexual violence in Indonesia, which continues to show a high level every year. However, its implementation has not been as optimal as desired by victims and the public due to several obstacles, including: 1) Not all derivative regulations of the TPKS Law have been enacted; 2). Limited human resources, facilities, infrastructure, and operational costs, and only 30 percent of districts/cities in Indonesia have safe houses for victims of sexual violence.
TNI Guarding the Prosecutor's Office Considered in Line with Prabowo's Asta Cita A. Junaedi Karso
Dynamics Social : International Journal of Social Sciences and Communication Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): International Journal of Social Sciences and Communication
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/dynamicssocial.v1i3.228

Abstract

The deployment of TNI soldiers has sparked controversy due to concerns over the strengthening of militarism in civilian institutions. This action has raised alarm among various human rights groups and political analysts who argue that it undermines the democratic principles of civilian control over military forces. The Attorney General's Office (AGO), the TNI, and the Chief of Police have publicly addressed the issue, especially the deployment of TNI soldiers to guard the AGO Complex, as well as the High Prosecutors' Offices (Kejati) and District Prosecutors' Offices (Kejari) across Indonesia. The order for this deployment was issued in the TNI Commander’s Telegram Number TR/442/2025 on May 6, 2025. This order is part of a broader effort to increase security at critical state institutions, especially in light of recent security threats. The deployment of soldiers is part of a follow-up to the cooperation agreement between the TNI and the AGO, which was formalized in the Memorandum of Understanding NK/6/IV/2023/TNI dated April 6, 2023. The agreement outlines eight points of cooperation, which include: (1) Education and training for TNI personnel in law enforcement procedures; (2) Exchange of information for law enforcement purposes, ensuring better collaboration between the military and civilian law enforcement agencies; (3) The assignment of TNI soldiers to assist in guarding AGO facilities and other law enforcement offices; and (4) Other security-related assistance, such as providing military expertise to ensure the integrity and safety of AGO operations. While the cooperation between the TNI and AGO is framed as an effort to enhance security and operational efficiency, critics argue that this deployment could lead to the militarization of civilian functions, potentially causing conflicts of interest and compromising the impartiality of the judicial system.
Indonesia-Singapore Diplomatic Relations: Exploring His-torical Ties, Economic Cooperation, Security, and Legal Challenges in All Aspects A. Junaedi Karso
International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijhs.v2i3.450

Abstract

The relationship between Indonesia and Singapore has deep historical roots, tracing back to the ancient kingdoms. In the 7th century, the Strait of Singapore was part of the Srivijaya Empire. Later, in 1365, the Javanese hymn Nagarakretagama, written during the Majapahit era, mentioned a settlement on the island called Temasek, highlighting the long-standing connection between the two regions. Trade between Indonesia and Singapore has grown significantly over the years, reaching S$36 billion (US$29.32 billion), with Singapore being the largest foreign investor in Indonesia, having invested US$1.14 billion across 142 projects. Additionally, trade between the two nations surged to approximately $68 billion in 2010, with Indonesia's non-oil and gas exports to Singapore reaching their highest levels. The two countries have established robust cooperation in various sectors, including tourism, security, counter-terrorism, and environmental concerns. However, the relationship is not without its challenges. One significant issue is Singapore's role as a haven for Indonesian corruptors, with many fugitives from corruption cases seeking refuge there. This has led to tensions, particularly regarding the extradition of individuals convicted of corruption. To address these challenges, both nations must enhance the implementation of bilateral agreements, especially in political and security matters. There is a need to accelerate the technical finalization of military training areas as part of the defense cooperation agreement. Additionally, executing the extradition agreement and updating the memorandum of understanding between the Attorneys General of both countries would be crucial steps in addressing these issues and improving bilateral relations. In conclusion, while Indonesia-Singapore relations are multifaceted, with both cooperation and challenges, mutual commitment to resolving issues through diplomatic and legal means will be key to strengthening their ties in the future.
A Series of Strategic Cooperation Towards 100 Years of In-donesia-France Relations A. Junaedi Karso
International Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Juli: International Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijsw.v2i3.449

Abstract

Macron's visit also commemorated 75 years of diplomatic relations and a decade of strategic partnership between Indonesia and France. This meeting showed how bilateral diplomacy can trigger long-term transformation in various sectors. The partnership is part of extending the diplomatic relations between the two countries, which will be 100 years old in 2050.  Indonesia and France are developing strategic partnerships in various important sectors, ranging from defense, technology, agriculture, economy, to culture. Both countries have the same vision of world order. The strategic partnership strengthens their positions in facing global uncertainty with a total of 21 strategic agreements. The forms of cooperation and strategic agreements between Indonesia and France include: 1) Defense sector, for example, the Indonesian Ministry of Defense and the French Ministry of Armed Forces agreed to establish a strategic partnership related to the exchange and joint protection of confidential information in the defense sector, 2) Economic sector, both countries agreed to encourage more balanced trade and investment relations, including: (1). MoU between the National Nutrition Agency and Danone; (2). Danantara and Eramet; (3). Investment Agreement between PT RGE Indonesia and Total Energies; (4). Investment Agreement between PT Citra Bonang Indonesia and Lesaffre; (5). MoU between PT SMI, PT PLN, and HDF; (6). MoU between Bank Indonesia and Banque De France, 3) Indonesia and France agreed to encourage Palestinian independence. This is considered the only way to resolve the long conflict between Palestine and Israel. Humanity must be prioritized in order to realize peace in the region. Two State Solutions" or a two-state solution is the most diplomatic way out for Palestinian independence.
TNI is Not an Office Guard, But a Guard of the Future of the Country Review of The Policy of Army Guarding the Prose-cutor's Office A. Junaedi Karso
Law and Justice research journal Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): July : Law and Justice research journal
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/ljrj.v1i3.79

Abstract

Deployment of TNI to secure the prosecutor's office Although the Policy arose based on Telegram No. TR/442/2025 which ordered the deployment of TNI soldiers to strengthen the security of the High Prosecutor's Office and the District Prosecutor's Office throughout Indonesia.Securing the prosecutor's office by the TNI is contrary to civilian supremacy, a distortion of the defense function, because it deviates from the spirit of reform and the constitution. Meaning When the law is passed by legal telegram, the deployment of the military for tasks other than war or what is known as Military Operations Other Than War (OMSP), is strictly regulated in Law Number 3 of 2025 concerning Amendments to Law No. 34 of 2004 concerning the TNI. In Article 7 paragraphs (3) and (4), it is emphasized that: (1). All forms of OMSP can only be carried out based on a state political decision, either in the form of a Presidential Regulation or Government Regulation, depending on the type and scope of its duties. This is a form of "administrative militarization" that slowly but surely erodes the neutrality of the TNI; (2). There is no emergency situation, no reports of armed threats against the prosecutor's office, and no political decisions from the president; (3). The TNI is not an Office Guard, but a Guardian of the State's Future, meaning that the state guard should not be deployed only to guard the office, because the deployment of the TNI for the security of the prosecutor's office is not a solution. It is the beginning of decline. So this policy should be rejected, for the sake of the constitution, for the sake of military neutrality, and for the future of a democratic and civilized Indonesia.
Konstitusionalisasi Hak Masyarakat Adat Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945 Wahyudi, Wahyudi; Karso, A. Junaedi
Limbago: Journal of Constitutional Law Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Constitusional Law
Publisher : Universitas Jambi, Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/limbago.v6i2.53671

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis konstitusionalisasi hak masyarakat adat pasca amandemen Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 serta implikasi yuridisnya terhadap sistem hukum nasional. Menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, historis, dan analitis, penelitian ini mengkaji pengakuan konstitusional terhadap masyarakat adat sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 18B  ayat (2), Pasal 28I ayat (3), dan Pasal 32 UUD NRI Tahun 1945. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa amandemen telah menaikkan derajat pengakuan masyarakat adat dari sekadar kebijakan menjadi norma konstitusional yang secara fundamental mengikat seluruh cabang kekuasaan negara. Implikasi yuridisnya menunjukkan adanya disharmoni dalam undang-undang sektoral seperti kehutanan, pertambangan, dan cipta kerja yang kerap mereduksi makna pengakuan konstitusional. Tantangan implementasi di tingkat daerah meliputi problem verifikasi, tumpang tindih kewenangan pusat-daerah, konflik agraria yang berujung pada kriminalisasi, serta pelemahan internal kelembagaan adat akibat modernisasi. Perspektif global menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia dapat belajar dari praktik progresif negara Amerika Latin dan Filipina, meskipun tekanan ekonomi internasional tetap menjadi tantangan. Konstitusionalisasi hanyalah langkah awal, sehingga diperlukan undang-undang komprehensif tentang masyarakat adat, penguatan kapasitas pemerintah daerah, sinergi pusat-daerah, serta pemberdayaan masyarakat adat sendiri untuk mewujudkan keadilan substantif sesuai mandat konstitusi.