Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

THE INFLUENCE OF WORK ENVIRONMENT AND LEADERSHIP STYLE ON WORK STRESS AND EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE Ni Luh Putu Vera Fajarini; I Wayan Terimajaya; Ni Luh Sili Antari
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 5 No. 3: Agustus 2025
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study analyzes how work environment and leadership style influence work stress and employee performance. The population of this study consisted of 186 nurses and midwives who were employed in the Inpatient Installation Room of the State General Hospital. The number of subjects included in this study was determined using the Slovin formula, which resulted in a total of 127 people. The research analysis technique employed a multifaceted approach, encompassing several key components. These components included validity and reliability tests, classical assumption tests, and Parth analysis. The findings of the analysis indicated that the work environment and leadership style exerted a negative and significant influence on employee work stress; conversely, the work environment and leadership style demonstrated a positive and significant impact on employee performance. Furthermore, work stress exhibited a negative and significant effect on employee performance, while the work environment exhibited a positive effect on employee performance through employee work stress. The present study sought to ascertain whether work stress could serve as a mediating variable in the relationship between the work environment and employee performance. To this end, an investigation was conducted on the inpatient installation of the State General Hospital. The results of the study indicated that leadership style has a positive effect on employee performance through employee work stress. The present study sought to examine the relationship between leadership style and employee performance in the Inpatient Installation of the State General Hospital. The hypothesis was that work stress would not be a mediating variable in this relationship. The study posits that the leadership of the Inpatient Installation of the State General Hospital can enhance the work environment, refine leadership skills, and alleviate work stress, thereby promoting enhanced employee performance.
FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI RETURN ON ASSET (ROA) PADA KOPERASI MEGA, KECAMATAN KEDIRI, KABUPATEN TABANAN Ni Putu Sudarsani; I Made Hary Kusmawan; I Wayan Terimajaya
Jurnal Ilmiah Satyagraha Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Ilmiah Satyagraha
Publisher : Universitas Mahendradatta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purposes of this study are 1) To analyze the effect of Non PerformingLoans (NPL) on Return On Assets (ROA) in the Mega Cooperative, Kediri District,Tabanan Regency. 2) To analyze the effect of Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) on ReturnOn Assets (ROA) in the Mega Cooperative, Kediri District, Tabanan Regency. 3) Toanalyze the effect of Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR) on Return On Assets (ROA) in the Mega Cooperative, Kediri District, Tabanan Regency. 4) To analyze the effect ofOperational Cost per Operational Income (BOPO) Return On Assets (ROA) on the MegaCooperative, Kediri District, Tabanan Regency. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to test the effect of NonPerforming Loans (NPL), Capital Adequency Ratio (CAR), Loan to Deposit Ratio(LDR), Operational Income Operating Costs (BOPO) on Return on Assets (ROA) inMultipurpose Savings and Loan Cooperatives . In this study, the defensive variables wereNPL (X1), CAR (X2), LDR (X3), BOPO (X4) while the independent variable was ROA(Y) The research results show 1) The value of the regression coefficient for NonPerforming Loans (NPL) is -0.007, the value of this regression coefficient is negativewhich indicates that there is no unidirectional relationship between the variable NonPerforming Loans (NPL) and Return On Assets (ROA). 2) The value of the regressioncoefficient for Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) is -0.013, the value of this regressioncoefficient is negative which indicates that there is no unidirectional relationship betweenthe Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) variable and Return On Assets (ROA). 3) The valueof the regression coefficient Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR) is -0.005, the value of thisregression coefficient is negative which indicates there is no unidirectional relationshipbetween the Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR) variable and Return On Assets (ROA). 4) Themagnitude of the regression coefficient value of Operational Income Operating Expenses(BOPO) is -0.017, the value of this regression coefficient is negative which indicatesthere is no unidirectional relationship between the variable Operating Income OperatingExpenses (BOPO) to Return On Assets (ROA).