Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.084
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Jurnal Locus Penelitian dan Pengabdian Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains West Science Law and Human Rights Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi
Ariel Alexander
Universitas Pelita Harapan
Aerospace Engineering Humanities Automotive Engineering Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
A Legal Analysis of Marine Tourism Development and Investment within the Framework of the Special Economic Zone in Sekotong Subdistrict, West Lombok Regency Ariel Alexander; Boy Gabriel Yohanes Simarmata; Dyo Ganda Siadari; Udin Silalahi
Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/eduvest.v6i4.53032

Abstract

Marine tourism development in Sekotong District, West Lombok Regency, has grown rapidly as part of an investment strategy within a special economic zone framework. However, this expansion raises legal issues related to coastal governance, environmental protection, and social justice for local communities. This research aims to conduct a normative juridical analysis of marine tourism development and investment to evaluate the consistency, synchronization, and harmonization of legal norms governing coastal and investment regulations. The research applies a normative juridical approach focusing on statutory analysis and secondary legal materials as the primary sources of examination. The findings indicate that Indonesia possesses a relatively comprehensive legal framework, yet regulatory disharmony, institutional coordination weaknesses, and the risk of unequal economic benefit distribution remain potential challenges. Without consistent legal governance, these conditions may trigger social conflict and ecological pressure. Therefore, strengthening regulatory harmonization and sustainability-oriented legal approaches is essential to ensure fair and sustainable marine tourism development.
Analisis Penerapan Business Judgment Rule terhadap Tanggung Jawab Direksi BUMN dalam Kasus PT ASDP Indonesia Ferry Wawan Zulmawan; Ariel Alexander; Boy Gabriel Yohanes Simarmata; Dyo Ganda Siadari
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v11i5.64321

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh meningkatnya kasus hukum yang melibatkan direksi Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN), khususnya terkait pengambilan keputusan bisnis yang dikaitkan dengan doktrin Business Judgment Rule (BJR). Dalam praktiknya, BJR sering dipahami sebagai bentuk perlindungan hukum terhadap direksi, namun penerapannya tidak bersifat absolut dan tetap memiliki batasan. Kasus PT ASDP Indonesia Ferry menjadi contoh konkret bagaimana keputusan bisnis direksi dapat dipersoalkan secara hukum meskipun tidak selalu didasarkan pada niat jahat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis batasan penerapan BJR, menilai tanggung jawab direksi atas penyimpangan prosedur, serta menguji apakah tindakan direksi dalam kasus tersebut memenuhi unsur-unsur BJR. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa BJR hanya dapat diterapkan apabila direksi memenuhi prinsip itikad baik, kehati-hatian, tidak adanya konflik kepentingan, serta keputusan yang didasarkan pada informasi yang memadai dan prosedur yang sah. Pelanggaran terhadap prosedur, meskipun tanpa niat jahat dan bahkan menghasilkan keuntungan, tetap dapat menghilangkan perlindungan BJR. Oleh karena itu, penerapan BJR harus dilakukan secara proporsional agar tidak disalahgunakan sebagai tameng untuk menghindari tanggung jawab hukum.
PENCEGAHAN PLAGIARISME MAHASISWA DI ERA ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MELALUI PENGUATAN INTEGRITAS AKADEMIK DI UNIVERSITAS PELITA HARAPAN (UPH) Ariel Alexander; Boy Gabriel Yohanes Simarmata; Dyo Ganda Siadari; Joel Zevanya Paparang; Kenzie Samuel Tumondang Bakara
Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi Vol. 3 No. 6 (2026): Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi (Juni 2026)
Publisher : PT. Hasba Edukasi Mandiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71282/jurmie.v3i6.2326

Abstract

The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has brought significant changes to higher education, particularly in learning activities and the completion of academic assignments. On one hand, AI provides convenience in accessing information and generating ideas; on the other hand, it increases the risk of plagiarism when used without proper academic ethics. This Community Service Program (PkM) aimed to enhance students’ understanding and awareness of the importance of academic integrity as a strategy to prevent plagiarism in the era of Artificial Intelligence at Universitas Pelita Harapan (UPH). The program employed an educational-participatory approach through socialization sessions, seminars, interactive discussions, case studies, and mentoring on the ethical and responsible use of AI. The results indicated that students gained a better understanding of academic integrity principles, various forms of plagiarism in the digital era, and the appropriate boundaries of AI utilization in academic activities. Furthermore, the program successfully increased students’ awareness of using AI as a learning support tool while maintaining academic honesty. Strengthening academic integrity and AI literacy proved to be essential in fostering an honest, responsible, and sustainable academic culture at Universitas Pelita Harapan.
Pkpu in Indonesia and its Comparison with the United Arab Emirates (Difc Insolvency Law) Ariel Alexander
Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/eduvest.v6i4.52952

Abstract

Debt restructuring is a key legal instrument to prevent liquidation and support debtor recovery. Indonesia applies the PKPU mechanism, while the DIFC uses the Insolvency Law No. 1 of 2019, reflecting different legal approaches that require comparative analysis. This research aims to analyze and compare the debt restructuring mechanism in the PKPU system in Indonesia and the Insolvency Law of DIFC, as well as assess its effectiveness in providing legal protection for debtors and creditors. This study uses normative legal methods with a statutory approach and a comparative approach. Data were obtained through literature studies and analyzed descriptively-analytically and comparatively. The results show that PKPU in Indonesia focuses on a peace mechanism through the approval of the majority of creditors with a certain time limit, while the DIFC Insolvency Law provides greater flexibility through a modern restructuring scheme with an international principles-based approach. The DIFC also provides stronger protection for creditors through transparency and more structured court oversight. In general, both systems have the same goal of saving the debtor's business and providing legal certainty for creditors. However, the restructuring mechanism in the DIFC tends to be more adaptive to international business practices, while PKPU in Indonesia still has some limitations in terms of efficiency and legal protection. Regulatory reform in Indonesia is needed to increase competitiveness and legal certainty in debt settlement.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Cyber Fraud Berbasis Rekayasa Sosial Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia Andreas Bintang Raja Sihombing; Patrisia Tanwijaya; Najla Azrijal Chosaf; Michelle Evelyn Marpaung; Keisha Zahra Wibowo; Dyo Ganda Siadari; Dinda Aurelia Rosi Nasution; Boy Gabriel Yohanes Simarmata; Ariel Alexander; Yuni Priskila Ginting
Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains Vol 5 No 01 (2026): Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/jhhws.v5i01.3261

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi digital telah meningkatkan intensitas kejahatan siber berbasis rekayasa sosial yang memanfaatkan manipulasi psikologis untuk memperoleh akses ilegal terhadap data pribadi dan aset digital korban. Cyber fraud tidak hanya menimbulkan kerugian finansial yang signifikan, tetapi juga berpotensi merusak kepercayaan publik terhadap sistem elektronik dan ekosistem ekonomi digital. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pelaku cyber fraud berbasis rekayasa sosial dalam sistem hukum Indonesia melalui kajian terhadap penerapan Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik, Undang-Undang Perlindungan Data Pribadi, serta Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana yang baru. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan studi kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perbuatan pelaku cyber fraud berbasis rekayasa sosial telah memenuhi unsur actus reus, mens rea, serta kemampuan bertanggung jawab, sehingga pelaku dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban pidana secara penuh. Sistem hukum Indonesia pada prinsipnya telah memiliki dasar normatif yang cukup komprehensif dalam menanggulangi kejahatan tersebut. Namun, efektivitas penegakan hukum masih bergantung pada peningkatan kapasitas forensik digital, optimalisasi koordinasi antar lembaga penegak hukum, serta penguatan kebijakan preventif melalui literasi digital masyarakat.
The Role of Mobile Forensics as Electronic Evidence in Proving Murder Cases Andreas Bintang Raja Sihombing; Patrisia Tanwijaya; Najla Azrijal Chosaf; Michelle Evelyn Marpaung; Keisha Zahra Wibowo; Dyo Ganda Siadari; Dinda Aurelia Rosi Nasution; Boy Gabriel Yohanes Simarmata; Ariel Alexander; Yuni Priskila Ginting
West Science Law and Human Rights Vol. 4 No. 02 (2026): West Science Law and Human Rights
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/wslhr.v4i02.2754

Abstract

This study examines the role of mobile forensics as electronic evidence in proving murder crimes in Indonesia amidst the increasing complexity of crimes and perpetrators' efforts to eliminate digital traces. The study uses a normative juridical method with a descriptive-analytical approach through a literature review of relevant laws and regulations, court decisions, and scientific literature. The results of the study indicate that mobile forensics has an important position in the criminal evidence system because it is able to produce legally valid electronic information and/or electronic documents as recognized in the Criminal Procedure Code, the ITE Law, and strengthened by Constitutional Court Decisions. In murder cases, mobile forensics plays a strategic role in tracing communications, locations, metadata, and digital activities to reconstruct the chronology of events, identify the perpetrator, and strengthen the judge's conviction. However, the strength of its evidence is highly dependent on the authenticity, integrity, and reliability of the data, as well as compliance with legal procedures such as chain of custody, lawful seizure, and the involvement of digital forensic experts. This study concludes that mobile forensics has become an important instrument in modern criminal law evidence, but its optimization still faces challenges in the form of lack of uniform operational standards, limited human resources, and the need to strengthen regulations to create legal certainty, justice, and effective law enforcement in the digital era.
Restrukturisasi sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Kepailitan PT Sritex dalam Perspektif Keadilan Bermartabat Ariel Alexander; Boy Gabriel Yohanes Simarmata; Dyo Ganda Siadari; Teguh Prasetyo
Jurnal Locus Penelitian dan Pengabdian Vol. 5 No. 7 (2026): JURNAL LOCUS: Penelitian dan Pengabdian
Publisher : Riviera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58344/locus.v5i7.5994

Abstract

Kepailitan PT Sri Rejeki Isman Tbk (Sritex) menjadi salah satu kasus yang memperoleh perhatian luas karena melibatkan perusahaan tekstil nasional yang memiliki kontribusi besar terhadap perekonomian Indonesia, penyerapan tenaga kerja, dan aktivitas ekspor. Permasalahan yang muncul adalah apakah likuidasi merupakan solusi yang paling tepat ataukah restrukturisasi dapat menjadi alternatif penyelesaian yang lebih berkeadilan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis restrukturisasi sebagai alternatif penyelesaian kepailitan PT Sritex serta mengkaji relevansinya dalam perspektif Keadilan Bermartabat. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus. Sumber bahan hukum terdiri atas bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier yang dianalisis secara kualitatif menggunakan metode preskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa restrukturisasi memiliki landasan hukum yang kuat dalam sistem kepailitan Indonesia melalui mekanisme Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU). Restrukturisasi dinilai lebih mampu menjaga keberlangsungan usaha, melindungi kepentingan kreditur, mempertahankan lapangan kerja, dan meminimalkan dampak sosial-ekonomi dibandingkan likuidasi. Dalam perspektif Keadilan Bermartabat, restrukturisasi mencerminkan keseimbangan antara kepastian hukum, kemanfaatan, dan keadilan sehingga lebih sesuai dengan nilai-nilai Pancasila dan tujuan hukum nasional.
Co-Authors Andreas Bintang Raja Sihombing Boy Gabriel Yohanes Simarmata Dinda Aurelia Rosi Nasution Dyo Ganda Siadari Joel Zevanya Paparang Jur. M. Udin Silalahi Keisha Zahra Wibowo Kenzie Samuel Tumondang Bakara Michelle Evelyn Marpaung Najla Azrijal Chosaf Patrisia Tanwijaya Prasetyo, Teguh Wawan Zulmawan Yuni Priskila Ginting