Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal ALWAQFU Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi dan Wakaf ISNU Nine-Star Multidisciplinary Journal (INS9MJ)
Ahyar Dinda Alamsyah Harahap
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS HUKUM PERDATA TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG RI NOMOR 3156 K/Pdt/2019 Ahyar Dinda Alamsyah Harahap; Handro Kurnia Sitorus; Naufal Akbar; Ahmad Mufti Farid Nababan; Muhammad Yasir Arifin Putra Nasution
ALWAQFU: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi dan Wakaf Vol. 3 No. 01 (2025): Februari Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi dan Wakaf
Publisher : P2WP MUI Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji tentang hukum bersangkutan dengan Putusan dari MA Republik Indonesia Nomor 3156 K/Pdt/2019, yang berfokus pada sengketa kepemilikan tanah antara H. Abd Salam (pemohon kasasi) melawan Binanto dan Bin Ernanto (termohon kasasi). Penelitian memakai metode yuridis normatif dengan membahas kasus tersebut, melibatkan analisis dokumen hukum, pendekatan perbandingan, dan interpretasi hukum. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa Mahkamah Agung menolak kasasi pemohon dengan menguatkan putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Surabaya. Pengadilan Tinggi menilai bahwa perdamaian dalam perkara sebelumnya membatalkan klaim pemohon atas tanah sengketa, meskipun berdasarkan Akta Jual Beli No. 109/PPAT/PAITON/2005. Putusan ini menegaskan pentingnya pengakuan fakta hukum dan kepatuhan pada prosedur formal dalam jual dan beli tanah, seperti pengesahan oleh Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) dan pendaftaran di kantor pertanahan. Studi ini merekomendasikan perlunya kehati-hatian jika terjadinya jual dan beli tanah dan peran proaktif PPAT dalam memverifikasi legalitas tanah untuk mencegah sengketa di masa depan
Civil Law Aspects of Crypto Investment Dispute Resolution Through Arbitration and Litigation Handro Kurnia Sitorus; Ahyar Dinda Alamsyah Harahap; Abdul Latif; Aripa Syawalia; Syifa Arinda
ISNU Nine-Star Multidisciplinary Journal Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Vol.2 No.3 Desember 2025
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/ins9mj.v2i3.924

Abstract

Digital transformation in the financial sector has given birth to new investment instruments in the form of crypto assets based on blockchain technology. Despite its great potential, crypto investment also gives rise to various civil disputes between investors and service provider platforms. Such disputes are often caused by defaults, unlawful acts, or losses due to digital system failures, which have not been specifically regulated in national law. This research aims to identify the form of civil law relationships in crypto transactions, examine the types of disputes that arise, and evaluate the effectiveness of two dispute resolution mechanisms, namely arbitration and litigation. The method used is a normative juridical approach through literature studies that include laws and regulations, scientific literature, as well as court and arbitration decisions. The results of the study show that arbitration has advantages in terms of efficiency and flexibility, but faces obstacles in enforcing cross-jurisdictional awards. In contrast, litigation provides stronger formal legal guarantees, but tends to be slow and less adaptive to technological aspects. The main obstacles faced are the absence of substantive regulations, limitations in digital proof, and low technical literacy of legal apparatus. Therefore, regulatory reform and institutional capacity strengthening are needed to ensure equal legal protection for crypto investors in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Abdul Latif Ahmad Mufti Farid Nababan Aripa Syawalia Handro Kurnia Sitorus Muhammad Yasir Arifin Putra Nasution Naufal akbar Syifa Arinda