Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Dakwah Berbasis Teknologi: Integrasi Media Sosial dan AI dalam Perspektif Sosiologi Dakwah Syukur, Abdul; Aridan, Muhammad; Santoso, Amin Nugrah
SAKALIMA: Pilar Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Pendidikan Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): June | SAKALIMA: Pilar Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Pendidikan
Publisher : WISE Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70211/sakalima.v2i1.225

Abstract

This study aims to explore the transformative role of social media and artificial intelligence (AI) in contemporary Islamic preaching through a comprehensive literature review. Ten peer-reviewed articles published between 2019 and 2025 were purposively selected to examine the intersection between digital technology and the sociological dynamics of da’wah. The findings reveal that social media has redefined the public sphere of da’wah by fostering participatory, interactive, and community-driven communication models. Concurrently, AI facilitates the automation and personalization of religious content delivery, enhancing accessibility while raising ethical and epistemological concerns. The integration of these technologies has not only revolutionized the methods of da’wah but also disrupted traditional structures of religious authority and knowledge production. The novelty of this study lies in its dual focus on both social media and AI within the sociological framework of da’wah an area that remains underexplored in prior research. The study recommends the development of digital literacy, ethical guidelines for AI-assisted preaching, and a renewed conceptual paradigm for understanding da’wah within a digitized religious ecosystem.
The Evolution of Legislative Power Relations between the Parliament and the President in Indonesia’s Constitutional System Arfandy, Muh Farhan; Ambarwati, Auliah; Santoso, Amin Nugrah; Wiwin, Wiwin
Amsir Law Journal Vol 7 No 1 (2025): Oktober
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36746/alj.v7i1.723

Abstract

This study examines the evolution of the legislative power relationship between the House of Representatives (DPR) and the President within Indonesia's constitutional framework, particularly before and after the amendments to the 1945 Constitution. It aims to identify how constitutional reforms have reshaped the distribution of legislative authority and whether they have succeeded in achieving a substantive balance of power. Using a qualitative, normative juridical approach with historical and comparative analysis, the study explores relevant constitutional documents, laws, and Constitutional Court decisions. The findings reveal that although the constitutional amendments shifted the Indonesian system from presidential dominance to a formal balance of power, lawmaking practices remain heavily influenced by executive control. The president retains significant authority in legislative initiation and formulation, while the role of the DPR is often constrained by political and institutional constraints. Consequently, the principle of checks and balances in Indonesia's presidential system tends to be cooperative rather than competitive, with procedural balance lacking substantive equality. The study concludes that constitutional reforms must be complemented by institutional strengthening of the DPR through increased research capacity, professional legislative drafting, and increased public participation. This study contributes to the theoretical discourse on constitutionalism by proposing a cooperative checks and balances model suitable for presidential systems characterized by asymmetric power relations
Administrative Violations and Process Disputes in the 2020 Regional Head Election of Bandar Lampung City Santoso, Amin Nugrah; Arsil, Fitra
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi Vol. 5 No. 11 (2024): Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jist.v5i11.8770

Abstract

The 2020 Regional Head Election in Bandar Lampung City is an election process that has been regulated in Law No. 10 of 2016. However, in the stage mechanism there are Systematic and Massive Structured violations according to the findings of the Lampung Provincial Bawaslu based on reports followed up by the Lampung Provincial Bawaslu. The purpose of this study is to find the factors that cause administrative violations in the 2020 Regional Elections in Bandar Lampung City based on Law Number 10 of 2016, explain cases of administrative violations of the Regional Elections related to process disputes and disputes over results, and analyze the process of resolving administrative violations of the Regional Elections against disputes over processes and disputes over results. The research method in writing this thesis is doctrinal law research with a method of collecting data from literature studies to answer problems which then the results are expected to aim at providing solutions or suggestions to overcome problems. Departing from the discussion, disputes over the election administration process and disputes over the results of the Regional Elections are the root of the problem in the 2020 Regional Head Election in Bandar Lampung City. The solution offered is the regulation of the 2020 Regional Elections based on Law Number 10 of 2016 regulating the implementation of the Regional Elections under normal circumstances, meaning that the Covid-19 pandemic has not occurred.
ANALISIS MAQASID SYARIAH JASSER AUDA TERHADAP DISKRIMINASI GENDER PADA REVISI UNDANG-UNDANG TENTARA NASIONAL INDONESIA Safitri, Kanza Indah; Santoso, Amin Nugrah; Zaelani, Abdul Qadir; Djausar, Jayusman
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 10 No. 04 (2025): Volume 10 No. 04 Desember 2025 Terbit
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v10i04.35009

Abstract

This study examines forms of gender discrimination in the Revision of the Indonesian National Armed Forces Law through the lens of Jasser Auda’s Maqasid al-Shariah and the concept of mubadalah (reciprocity). The revision of the Indonesian National Armed Forces Law has sparked debate concerning gender discrimination that hinders justice and equality between men and women, with implications for social structures and the values of justice in family law. The revised law reflects gender bias through the restriction of strategic positions for women, the construction of domestic roles as female identifiers, and regulations concerning marital status and marriage permits for members of the Indonesian National Armed Forces.This study aims to analyze the forms of gender discrimination in the revised law through the perspective of Maqasid al-Shariah as articulated by Jasser Auda, and its relevance to the principle of justice in Islamic family law. The research employs a normative-comparative approach, examining the academic manuscript of the law revision, classical and contemporary fiqh literature, and Jasser Auda’s maqasid framework, which is holistic, systemic, and oriented toward public welfare (maslahah). The findings indicate that the provisions within the revised law remain grounded in a patriarchal paradigm consistent with traditional social structures in family law, where women are often positioned as secondary actors in both public and private spheres. From Jasser Auda’s perspective, the principles of maqasid must be directed toward achieving al-‘adl (justice), al-karamah al-insaniyyah (human dignity), and taṭawwur (social transformation) as expressions of hifẓ al-nafs (protection of life), hifẓ al-‘aql (protection of intellect), and hifẓ al-nasl (protection of lineage). Therefore, gender discrimination in the Revised TNI Law contradicts the modern maqasid paradigm, which emphasizes the integration of law and social reality. Reformulating military legal policy must integrate the values of gender justice as emphasized in Jasser Auda’s maqasid framework so that national positive law and Islamic family law can harmoniously work together in realizing maslahah (public welfare) and substantive equality.