Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.882
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Diktum Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis, Manajemen dan Akuntansi (JEBMAK) Ekoman: Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis Dan Manajemen
Erwin Aditya Pratama
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Diktum

 1 
Rekonstruksi Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia melalui Pembaruan Asas-Asas Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 dalam Perspektif Hukum Responsif) Imam Asmarudin; Erwin Aditya Pratama; Mukhidin
Diktum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): November
Publisher : Universitas Pancasakti Tegal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24905/a94zcs74

Abstract

This study examines the urgency of reconstructing the principles governing legislative drafting in Indonesia in light of the Constitutional Court’s formal review of the Job Creation Law, particularly concerning the omnibus law model. The research addresses two central issues: (1) the implications of the Constitutional Court’s formal review decision for the legislative drafting process; and (2) whether the principles stipulated in Article 5 of Law No. 12 of 2011 on Law-Making are adequate to ensure legal certainty within Indonesia’s dynamic legislative framework. This research employs a normative juridical method, utilizing statutory and conceptual approaches, and is analyzed through a prescriptive legal framework. The findings indicate that the high frequency of judicial review, the phenomena of overregulation, regulatory overlap, and normative disharmony reflect the absence of anticipatory and responsive dimensions in the legislative process. The Constitutional Court’s decision, including the presence of dissenting opinions, underscores the necessity of more adaptive procedural standards capable of responding to evolving legal and societal demands. This study proposes the reconstruction of Article 5 of Law No. 12 of 2011 by incorporating anticipatory and responsive principles as normative instruments to enhance legislative quality and strengthen legal certainty. The scholarly contribution of this research lies in the conceptual formulation of integrating anticipatory and responsive principles into the framework of national legal development.
Co-Authors Eddhie Praptono Imam Asmarudin Lia Rizqi Amalia MOH. TAUFIK Mukhidin Nuridin Oktavia Cahyaningtyas Rizky Mahesa Sanusi Viza Rizky Ardian