Maulana Siregar, Abdul Rahman
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

Evaluasi Kebijakan Hukum Tentang Vaksinasi Wajib dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia dan Kesehatan Publik Maya Sartika Simangunsong, Dewi; Febriana Saragih, Lisnaria; Maulana Siregar, Abdul Rahman
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 5 No. 04 (2024): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v5i04.1037

Abstract

Vaksinasi wajib merupakan salah satu kebijakan strategis untuk melindungi kesehatan masyarakat dan mencegah penyebaran penyakit menular. Namun, kebijakan ini sering kali memicu perdebatan terkait batasan antara kewajiban kolektif untuk kesehatan publik dan penghormatan terhadap hak asasi manusia (HAM), seperti kebebasan individu dan hak atas otonomi tubuh. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi kebijakan hukum tentang vaksinasi wajib dari perspektif HAM dan kesehatan publik. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan menganalisis regulasi hukum nasional dan internasional, serta pendekatan empiris untuk mengevaluasi dampak implementasi kebijakan tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun kebijakan vaksinasi wajib memiliki dasar hukum yang kuat dalam rangka melindungi kesehatan publik, penerapannya sering kali menghadapi tantangan dalam memastikan penghormatan terhadap prinsip-prinsip HAM. Selain itu, efektivitas kebijakan dalam meningkatkan cakupan vaksinasi dan membangun herd immunity sangat bergantung pada tingkat pemahaman masyarakat, mekanisme implementasi, dan keadilan distribusi vaksin. Studi ini merekomendasikan penguatan kebijakan vaksinasi wajib melalui pendekatan berbasis data, komunikasi publik yang efektif, dan penegakan hukum yang mempertimbangkan prinsip proporsionalitas antara pembatasan HAM dan kepentingan kesehatan masyarakat. Dengan demikian, kebijakan tersebut dapat lebih responsif terhadap tantangan hukum, sosial, dan etis yang ada, sekaligus mendukung pencapaian tujuan kesehatan publik secara optimal
Teori Hukum Feminisme dan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Perempuan di Indonesia Helena Sitanggang, Yanika; Suriyani Br Nainggolan, Esra Labora; Maulana Siregar, Abdul Rahman
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 5 No. 04 (2024): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v5i04.1044

Abstract

Teori hukum feminisme merupakan pendekatan kritis terhadap hukum yang bertujuan untuk mengungkap bias gender yang terkandung dalam sistem hukum. Di Indonesia, perempuan sering kali menghadapi ketidakadilan hukum yang berakar pada budaya patriarki dan kelemahan dalam peraturan perundang-undangan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penerapan teori hukum feminisme dalam menciptakan perlindungan hukum bagi perempuan di Indonesia, khususnya dalam konteks kekerasan berbasis gender, ketenagakerjaan, dan hak asasi manusia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan yuridis-normatif dengan analisis kualitatif terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, kasus-kasus hukum, serta literatur akademik yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun Indonesia telah memiliki beberapa peraturan hukum yang berpihak pada perempuan, seperti Undang-Undang Penghapusan Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga (UU PKDRT), implementasi di lapangan masih menghadapi berbagai kendala. Faktor budaya, minimnya pemahaman aparat penegak hukum tentang gender, serta stigma sosial menjadi penghalang utama. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan penguatan regulasi berbasis gender, pelatihan aparat hukum, serta pemberdayaan perempuan melalui pendidikan hukum untuk memastikan perlindungan yang lebih efektif. Dengan mengintegrasikan teori hukum feminisme, sistem hukum Indonesia dapat lebih responsif terhadap kebutuhan perempuan dan berkontribusi pada terciptanya keadilan gender.
Implementation of Restorative Justice Towards the Criminal Act Aggravated Theft in The East Medan Sector Police Emri, Sagita Ifani; Maulana Siregar, Abdul Rahman; Rahmayanti, Rahmayanti
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i3.1813

Abstract

This study analyzes the application of restorative justice to aggravated theft crimes at the East Medan Police Sector between January 2022 and June 2025. The approach used is a normative-empirical study with a juridical-sociological framework. The normative aspect examines Article 363 of the Criminal Code, Law Number 2 of 2002, Police Regulation Number 8 of 2021, Attorney General Regulation Number 15 of 2020, and Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2024. The empirical aspect captures practices at the East Medan Police Sector through case data, interviews with investigators, victims, and perpetrators, as well as administrative documentation. The caseload under Article 363 has been relatively stable at 28 to 46 reports per quarter, with motorcycle theft accounting for 57 to 64 percent. Restorative justice facilitation is selectively implemented in 4 to 8 cases per quarter, with a success rate of 60 to 75 percent, and a resolution time of 18 to 21 days, faster than the typical 40-day transfer of files. Key criteria include voluntary consent from the parties, non-recidivists, restitution of losses, and a lack of public unrest. Cases involving violence, serious threats, or those that disrupt public security are not transferred to restorative justice and remain in litigation. Findings indicate that this restorative justice mechanism is effective for certain cases, consistent with the principle of ultimum remedium, reduces the burden of the judicial process, and increases party satisfaction. However, obstacles arise from differing perceptions among law enforcement officials, concerns about the deterrent effect, and inconsistent post-mediation monitoring. The study recommends strengthening SOPs based on eligibility indicators, mediation training for investigators, formal coordination with prosecutors and courts, involvement of community leaders, and post-settlement monitoring by Bhabinkamtibmas to prevent recurrence and maintain accountability.
Application of the Principle of Propotionality in Sentencing for Criminal Acts of Assault Faizan, Ahbym; Maulana Siregar, Abdul Rahman; Rahmayanti, Rahmayanti
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i3.1817

Abstract

The principle of proportionality is an important principle in criminal law that serves to ensure a balance between the severity of the crime and the punishment imposed. In crimes of assault in Indonesia, the application of the principle of proportionality is crucial because variations in the form of assault often lead to differences in the level of culpability of the perpetrator and the impact on the victim. This study aims to analyze the application of the principle of proportionality in criminal justice practice, particularly in relation to judges' decisions in assault cases. The method used is a normative juridical approach by examining the provisions of the Criminal Code (KUHP), legal doctrine, and relevant court decisions. The results of the analysis indicate that the application of the principle of proportionality still faces several obstacles, such as disparities in decisions, judges' subjectivity in assessing mitigating and aggravating circumstances, and limited binding sentencing guidelines. Nevertheless, the principle of proportionality remains an important foundation in realizing substantive justice, by considering aspects of victim rights protection, crime prevention, and social reintegration for perpetrators. In conclusion, the application of the principle of proportionality in criminal acts of assault in Indonesia requires consistent application by judges, clearer sentencing guidelines, and strengthening the role of progressive law to achieve a balance between individual and societal interests.
The Application of Law Towards The Right to Health Services for Community Inmates (Study of Class II A Binjai Prison) Gultom, Andi; Maulana Siregar, Abdul Rahman; Ramadani , Suci
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i3.2075

Abstract

Correctional inmates are members of society who, unable to adapt to life in other communities, commit violations that require isolation and serve their sentences. During this process, they will be placed in a correctional institution (LAPAS). Law No. 22 of 2022 concerning Corrections regulates the right to health services for all inmates. This is a crucial factor for inmates in facilitating all correctional activities in the prison. The research was conducted in Binjai City, specifically at the Class II A Binjai Correctional Institution (Lapas) Office. This study used an empirical juridical approach. Data obtained in the field were presented descriptively using an empirical normative approach.This study aimed to determine the provision of health services to inmates at the Class II A Binjai Prison and the obstacles faced in providing these services to inmates at the Class II A Binjai Prison. Based on the author's research findings, the health services provided are in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. However, overcapacity has resulted in suboptimal services. Obstacles faced in providing health services to inmates come from within the inmates themselves, due to the large number of inmates not yet registered as BPJS Kesehatan holders, a lack of awareness of administrative regulations, and overcapacity, which results in suboptimal health services
Criminal Law Politics on The Granting of Reintegration Rights to Community Inmates (Study at Class II A Binjai Prison) Nasution, Sudarno Hariadi; Maulana Siregar, Abdul Rahman; Ismaidar, Ismaidar
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i3.2076

Abstract

Indonesia's national legal policy is based on the state's vision, as formulated in the Preamble to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, namely to protect the entire nation, advance public welfare, and enhance the nation's intellectual life, as well as to contribute to maintaining world order to achieve social justice.This research was conducted in Binjai City, specifically at the Class II A Binjai Penitentiary Office. This research employed an empirical juridical approach. Data obtained in the field were presented descriptively using an empirical normative approach.This research aimed to determine the criminal law policy regarding the granting of reintegration rights to inmates at the Class II A Binjai Penitentiary and the obstacles encountered in granting reintegration rights to inmates at the Class II A Binjai Penitentiary. Based on the research findings, the author found that the implementation of the rules and policies granting reintegration rights to inmates is based on Law No. 12 of 1995, which has been amended by Law No. 22 of 2022 concerning Corrections. The obstacles faced in granting reintegration rights come from the correctional inmates themselves due to a lack of concern for the administrative rules and conditions stipulated for granting reintegration rights to correctional inmates.