Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

TANGGUNG JAWAB DIREKSI TERHADAP TERJADINYA KREDIT MACET PADA PERBANKAN BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 40 TAHUN 2007 Hasnati, Hasnati
Soumatera Law Review Vol 2, No 1 (2019): SOUMLAW
Publisher : Kopertis Wilayah X

Banks are companies whose business activities are to raise funds, channel funds, and provide financial services. Of the three bank business activities, the distribution of funds is an activity that is a source of income spread over the bank. However, large profits are directly proportional to the high level of risk, namely the occurrence of bad credit. The problem that will be discussed in this study is how is the responsibility of bank directors regarding the occurrence of bad credit to companies based on Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies? The method used in this study is normative legal research using the statutory approach. The results of this study are that based on Article 97 of Act No. 40 of 2007, the directors are fully responsible personally for the company's losses if the person concerned is guilty or negligent in carrying out his duties. That is, as the party that gives approval in lending, the bank directors must be fully responsible if the disbursed credit is a problem in the future and becomes bad credit which causes losses to the company.

PEMISAHAN KEKAYAAN PERSEROAN TERBATAS DARI KEKAYAAN PEMEGANG SAHAM, DEWAN KOMISARIS DAN DEWAN DIREKSI Hasnati, Hasnati; Dewi, Sandra; Utama, Andrew Shandy
Ensiklopedia Sosial Review Vol 1, No 1 (2019): Volume 1 No 1 Februari 2019
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/esr.v1i1.220

In order for legal entities to interact in legal relationships such as making agreements, conducting certain business activities requires capital. The initial capital of the legal entity came from the founder's wealth which was separated. The initial capital becomes the wealth of the legal entity, regardless of the founder's wealth. This article looks at how the separation of limited company wealth from the wealth of shareholders, board of commissioners and board of directors. The research methodology used is the normative juridical research method. Company Organs are the General Meeting of Shareholders, Directors and Board of Commissioners (Article 1 number 2 of the Company Law). The Board of Directors is the Company's Organ which has the authority and is fully responsible for the management of the Company for the interests of the Company, in accordance with the aims and objectives of the Company and represents the Company, both inside and outside the court in accordance with the provisions of the articles of association (Article 1 number 5 of the Company Law). Whereas the Commissioners are the Company's Organs whose duty is to supervise general and / or specifically in accordance with the articles of association and provide advice to the Directors (Article 1 number 6 of Company Law). In PT, the shareholders delegate their authority to the directors to run and develop the company in accordance with the objectives and business fields of the company. In connection with this task, directors are authorized to represent the Company, enter into agreements and contracts, and so on. If there is a very large loss (above 50%) then the board of directors must report it to the shareholders and third parties, and then close it together. Keywords: Separation of Wealth, Limited Liability Company, Shareholders' Wealth.

MENGENAL FIDUCIARY DUTY DAN BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE DIREKSI DAN KOMISARIS Dewi, Sandra; Hasnati, Hasnati
Ensiklopedia Sosial Review Vol 1, No 2 (2019): Volume 1 No 2 Juni 2019
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/esr.v1i2.226

To find out the Fiduciary Duty and Business Judgment Rule for Directors and commissioners, it must be considered the basic provisions governing the duties of management, obligations and especially the responsibilities of the directors of limited liability companies in the Company Law. Regarding the management of the company regulated in the Company Law with fiduciary duty and business judgment rule, it can be said that the basic provisions governing fiduciary duty and the business judgment rule in the Company Law can be found in general rules or provisions in Article 97 of Company Law. . These general provisions then spread in various other articles in the Company Law. Keywords: Fiduciary Duty, Business Judgment Rule, Directors and Commissioner

PEMISAHAN KEKAYAAN PERSEROAN TERBATAS DARI KEKAYAAN PEMEGANG SAHAM, DEWAN KOMISARIS DAN DEWAN DIREKSI Hasnati Hasnati; Sandra Dewi; Andrew Shandy Utama
Ensiklopedia Social Review Vol 1, No 1 (2019): Volume 1 No 1 Februari 2019
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/esr.v1i1.220

In order for legal entities to interact in legal relationships such as making agreements, conducting certain business activities requires capital. The initial capital of the legal entity came from the founder's wealth which was separated. The initial capital becomes the wealth of the legal entity, regardless of the founder's wealth. This article looks at how the separation of limited company wealth from the wealth of shareholders, board of commissioners and board of directors. The research methodology used is the normative juridical research method. Company Organs are the General Meeting of Shareholders, Directors and Board of Commissioners (Article 1 number 2 of the Company Law). The Board of Directors is the Company's Organ which has the authority and is fully responsible for the management of the Company for the interests of the Company, in accordance with the aims and objectives of the Company and represents the Company, both inside and outside the court in accordance with the provisions of the articles of association (Article 1 number 5 of the Company Law). Whereas the Commissioners are the Company's Organs whose duty is to supervise general and / or specifically in accordance with the articles of association and provide advice to the Directors (Article 1 number 6 of Company Law). In PT, the shareholders delegate their authority to the directors to run and develop the company in accordance with the objectives and business fields of the company. In connection with this task, directors are authorized to represent the Company, enter into agreements and contracts, and so on. If there is a very large loss (above 50%) then the board of directors must report it to the shareholders and third parties, and then close it together. Keywords: Separation of Wealth, Limited Liability Company, Shareholders' Wealth.

MENGENAL FIDUCIARY DUTY DAN BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE DIREKSI DAN KOMISARIS Sandra Dewi; Hasnati Hasnati
Ensiklopedia Social Review Vol 1, No 2 (2019): Volume 1 No 2 Juni 2019
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/esr.v1i2.226

To find out the Fiduciary Duty and Business Judgment Rule for Directors and commissioners, it must be considered the basic provisions governing the duties of management, obligations and especially the responsibilities of the directors of limited liability companies in the Company Law. Regarding the management of the company regulated in the Company Law with fiduciary duty and business judgment rule, it can be said that the basic provisions governing fiduciary duty and the business judgment rule in the Company Law can be found in general rules or provisions in Article 97 of Company Law. . These general provisions then spread in various other articles in the Company Law. Keywords: Fiduciary Duty, Business Judgment Rule, Directors and Commissioner

IMPLEMENTASI CSR PT ASIA FORESTAMA RAYA TERHADAP PEMBERDAYAAN PEREKONOMIAN MASYARAKAT PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19 Hasnati Hasnati; Sandra Dewi; Andrew Shandy Utama
Ensiklopedia Social Review Vol 3, No 1 (2021): Volume 3 No 1 Februari 2021
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/esr.v3i1.682

PT Asia Forestama Raya is a forest product processing factory for the wood industry's raw materials. Based on Article 74 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies, it is stipulated that companies that carry out their business activities in the natural resources sector and / or fields related to natural resources are required to implement CSR. In Article 10 of Riau Provincial Regulation Number 6 of 2012 concerning Corporate Social Responsibility in Riau Province, it is stated that CSR programs can take the form of community economic empowerment. This research aims to explain the implementation of PT Asia Forestama Raya's CSR on community economic empowerment during the Covid-19 pandemic. The method used in this research is socio-legal research. During the Covid-19 pandemic, the public really expected a real contribution from PT Asia Forestama Raya. PT Asia Forestama Raya's obstacle in implementing community economic empowerment in Limbungan Village is that the financial condition of PT Asia Forestama Raya is currently in an unstable state. Efforts that can be made by the people of Limbungan Village if PT Asia Forestama Raya doesn’t carry out a CSR program are to convey their aspirations to Commission IV of DPRD Pekanbaru City. Based on Article 32 of Riau Provincial Regulation Number 6 of 2012 concerning Corporate Social Responsibility in Riau Province, it is stated that if PT Asia Forestama Raya doesn’t carry out CSR towards empowering the community's economy, the company can be subject to administrative sanctions by the Pekanbaru City Government.

Tanggung Jawab Hukum Tukang Gigi Dalam Pelayanan Jasa Harvandy Anwir; Hasnati -; Indra Afrita
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihap.v4i2.1799

Maraknya praktik tukang gigi menjadi sebuah cerita tersendiri dimasyarakat. Berbekal pengalaman dalam kegiatan pemasangan gigi tiruan dan pemasangan kawat gigi tentunya menjadi solusi bagi masyarakat menengah kebawah dalam mendapatkan pelayanan Kesehatan gigi. Terlebih harga yang ditawarkan juga terjangkau. Temuan dilapangan, apa yang dilakukan dalam aktifitasnya banyak bertentangan dengan Permenkes No. 39 Tahun 2014. Kewenangan yang telah diatur nyatanya masih banyak yang dilanggar oleh tukang gigi. Hal ini tentu akan membahayakan masyarakat sebagai konsumen dimana tindakan medis yang seharusnya dilakukan oleh dokter gigi kini di lakukan oleh orang yang memang sama sekali tidak memiliki kompetensi yang sesuai. Tujuan dari penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui tanggungjawab hukum dari tukang gigi terhadap konsumen layanan jasa Kesehatan. Penelitian kualitatif yang bersifat normatif dilakukan dengan beberapa pendekatan seperti pendekatan perundang-undangan, yuridis normatif serta konseptual dan sejarah. Data primer, sekumder dan tersier di gunakan untuk menjawab dari permasalahan dan dilakukan Analisa dan disajikan secara deskriptif. Temuan penelitian didapatkan bahwa tanggung jawab hukum tukang gigi terhadap konsumen adalah tanggung jawab pelaku usaha atas kerugian konsumen berupa penggantian barang/jasa yang sama atau penggantian dengan sejumlah uang serta akibat hukum terhadap tukang gigi adalah timbulnya hak dan kewajiban yang harus dilakukan terhadap pasien The growth of dental artisans as a profession is a different story in the society. With experience in the placement of dentures and braces, it is unquestionably a viable option for persons in the lower middle class seeking dental care. Furthermore, the given price is reasonable. Many of the findings in the field, as well as what is done in its activities, contradict Permenkes No. 39 of 2014. In fact, dental artisant continue to abuse several of the regulated powers. This will undoubtedly put the population at risk as customers, as medical actions that should be performed by dentists are now being performed by people who lack the necessary expertise. The study's goal was to identify the legal duty of dental craftsmen to dentist artisan consumers. Normative qualitative research is conducted using a variety of methods, including legislative, judicial decisions, conceptual, and historical perspectives. To solve the challenges, primary, secondary, and tertiary data were gathered, evaluated, and presented in a descriptive manner. The study discovered that the legal responsibility of dental artisans to consumers is the responsibility of business actors for consumer losses in the form of replacement of the same goods/services or replacement with a monetary amount and that the legal consequences for dental artisans are the emergence of rights and obligations that must be carried out on patients.

KEDUDUKAN HUKUM PEMEGANG POLIS PERUSAHAAN ASURANSI PAILIT DI INDONESIA Togar Manihuruk; Yeni Triana; Hj. Hasnati
Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 8 No 11 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Tujuan study ini untuk menganalisis kedudukan hukum pemegang polis perusahaan asuransi pailit, apakah sebagai kreditur preferen atau kreditur kongkuren menurut hukum kepailitan di Indonesia. Studi ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konseptuan dan perundang-undangan. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa kedudukan hukum pemegang polis perusahaan asuransi pailit menurut hukum kepailitan di Indonesia adalah masuk kategori kreditur preferen. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal position of bankrupt insurance company policyholders, whether they are preferred creditors or non-secured creditors according to bankruptcy law in Indonesia. This study uses a normative legal research method with a conceptual approach and statute approach. The study result shows that the legal position of bankrupt insurance company policyholders according to the bankruptcy law in Indonesia is in the preferred creditor category.

KEWAJIBAN PERUSAHAAN PAILIT DALAM PENYELESAIAN HAK-HAK KARYAWAN DITINJAU DARI UNDANG UNDANG NO 37 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG KEPAILITAN DAN UNDANG UNDANG NO 13 TAHUN 2003 TENTANG KETENAGAKERJAAN Devi Susanto; Hasnati Hasnati; Fahmi Fahmi
Qistie Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 13, No 2 (2020): Qistie : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wahid Hasyim

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31942/jqi.v13i2.3912

The Manpower Law and the Bankruptcy Law are both specifically regulating laws and regulations, so that in practice the priority principle cannot be used because the two laws have the same position. This of course results in a conflict of norms which creates legal uncertainty for workers in obtaining their rights. The formulation of the problem in this research is the Obligations of Bankrupt Companies in Settling Employee Rights in terms of Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower, and the Legal Consequences of Bankruptcy Company Obligations in Settling Employee Rights in Review From Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower. The method used is normative legal research. Sources of data consist of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. In this study the data were analyzed qualitatively and in drawing conclusions, the authors applied a deductive thinking method. The conclusion in this study has answered the problems that arise, namely the Obligations of the Bankrupt Company in Resolving Employee Rights in terms of Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower, the Company still has responsibilities that must be fulfilled to employees. , both before and after the bankruptcy declaration was passed. Prior to the issuance of the bankruptcy decision, the Company is responsible for paying the outstanding employee's wages and other rights in full before the Company loses its authority to manage and transfer its assets by the curator. Employees are entitled to severance pay, period of service pay, and compensation, in addition, employees are also entitled to wages payable before and after the bankruptcy decision. Based on Article 39 paragraph (2) Bankruptcy explains that since the date of pronouncement of the bankruptcy declaration, the wages payable before and after the pronouncement of bankruptcy constitute a debt of bankruptcy assets. This provision is then strengthened by other provisions, namely Article 95 paragraph (4) of the Manpower Law which states that when a company is declared bankrupt, the wages and other rights of the worker / laborer are a debt with payment precedence. Legal Consequences of Bankruptcy Company Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum QISTIE Vol. 13 No. 2 November 2020 243 Obligations in Settling Employee Rights In terms of Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower, the company represented by the board of directors still has the duty to assist in resolving bankruptcy assets at the request of the curator. This is done to achieve the aims and objectives of the Company for bankruptcy so that debts to creditors, including employees as preferred creditors, can be realized. Employees as Creditors who are privileged in this case depend heavily on the actions taken by the curator because employees do not have the authority to carry out the execution of material guarantees like those of the Separatist Creditors.

Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Pengelola Parkir Terhadap Kehilangan Kendaraan Muhammad Iqbal; Hasnati Hasnati; Indra Afrita
DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW Vol 5, No 1 (2022): Doktrina:Juornal of Law April 2022
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/doktrina.v5i1.6032

Tanggung jawab pelaku usaha secara jelas telah diatur dalam Bab VI Pasal 19 sampai dengan Pasal 28 Undan-undang Perlindungan Konsumen. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Pengelola Parkir Terhadap Kehilangan Kendaraan dan Akibat Hukum Dari Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Pengelola Parkir Terhadap Kehilangan Kendaraan. Metode penelitian ini adalah Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Hasil penelitian tanggung jawab pelaku usaha pengelola parkir terhadap kehilangan kendaraan bahwa tanggung jawab pelaku usaha parkir terhadap kehilangan barang yang terdapat di dalam kendaraan konsumen yaitu menjadi tanggung jawab pengelola parkir, karena tanggung jawab pengelola parkir sebagai pihak penerima titipan adalah memelihara obyek titipan sebagaimana memelihara kepunyaan sendiri serta harus mengembalikan dalam wujud asalnya. Sehingga kehilangan barang yang terdapat di dalam kendaraan konsumen tetap menjadi tanggung jawab pengelola parkir. Akibat hukum tanggung jawab pelaku usaha pengelola parkir terhadap kehilangan kendaraan bahwa pelaku usaha bertanggungjawab dalam memberikan ganti kerugian atas terjadinya kerusakan, pencemaran dan memberikan ganti kerugian konsumen akibat mengkonsumsi barang dan/atau jasa yang dihasilkan atau diperdagangkan. Berdasarkan penjelasan tersebut maka konsumen pengguna jasa parkir apabila terjadi kehilangan ataupun kerugian berhak untuk menuntut kepada pihak pengelola parkir.

Title

Found 19 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 19 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 19 Documents
Search