Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

KEDUDUKAN HUKUM PEMEGANG POLIS PERUSAHAAN ASURANSI PAILIT DI INDONESIA Togar Manihuruk; Yeni Triana; Hj. Hasnati
Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 8 No 11 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (484.109 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2020.v08.i11.p07

Abstract

Tujuan study ini untuk menganalisis kedudukan hukum pemegang polis perusahaan asuransi pailit, apakah sebagai kreditur preferen atau kreditur kongkuren menurut hukum kepailitan di Indonesia. Studi ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konseptuan dan perundang-undangan. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa kedudukan hukum pemegang polis perusahaan asuransi pailit menurut hukum kepailitan di Indonesia adalah masuk kategori kreditur preferen. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal position of bankrupt insurance company policyholders, whether they are preferred creditors or non-secured creditors according to bankruptcy law in Indonesia. This study uses a normative legal research method with a conceptual approach and statute approach. The study result shows that the legal position of bankrupt insurance company policyholders according to the bankruptcy law in Indonesia is in the preferred creditor category.
KEWAJIBAN PERUSAHAAN PAILIT DALAM PENYELESAIAN HAK-HAK KARYAWAN DITINJAU DARI UNDANG UNDANG NO 37 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG KEPAILITAN DAN UNDANG UNDANG NO 13 TAHUN 2003 TENTANG KETENAGAKERJAAN Devi Susanto; Hasnati Hasnati; Fahmi Fahmi
Qistie Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 13, No 2 (2020): Qistie : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wahid Hasyim

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31942/jqi.v13i2.3912

Abstract

The Manpower Law and the Bankruptcy Law are both specifically regulating laws and regulations, so that in practice the priority principle cannot be used because the two laws have the same position. This of course results in a conflict of norms which creates legal uncertainty for workers in obtaining their rights. The formulation of the problem in this research is the Obligations of Bankrupt Companies in Settling Employee Rights in terms of Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower, and the Legal Consequences of Bankruptcy Company Obligations in Settling Employee Rights in Review From Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower. The method used is normative legal research. Sources of data consist of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. In this study the data were analyzed qualitatively and in drawing conclusions, the authors applied a deductive thinking method. The conclusion in this study has answered the problems that arise, namely the Obligations of the Bankrupt Company in Resolving Employee Rights in terms of Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower, the Company still has responsibilities that must be fulfilled to employees. , both before and after the bankruptcy declaration was passed. Prior to the issuance of the bankruptcy decision, the Company is responsible for paying the outstanding employee's wages and other rights in full before the Company loses its authority to manage and transfer its assets by the curator. Employees are entitled to severance pay, period of service pay, and compensation, in addition, employees are also entitled to wages payable before and after the bankruptcy decision. Based on Article 39 paragraph (2) Bankruptcy explains that since the date of pronouncement of the bankruptcy declaration, the wages payable before and after the pronouncement of bankruptcy constitute a debt of bankruptcy assets. This provision is then strengthened by other provisions, namely Article 95 paragraph (4) of the Manpower Law which states that when a company is declared bankrupt, the wages and other rights of the worker / laborer are a debt with payment precedence. Legal Consequences of Bankruptcy Company Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum QISTIE Vol. 13 No. 2 November 2020 243 Obligations in Settling Employee Rights In terms of Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower, the company represented by the board of directors still has the duty to assist in resolving bankruptcy assets at the request of the curator. This is done to achieve the aims and objectives of the Company for bankruptcy so that debts to creditors, including employees as preferred creditors, can be realized. Employees as Creditors who are privileged in this case depend heavily on the actions taken by the curator because employees do not have the authority to carry out the execution of material guarantees like those of the Separatist Creditors.
Perbandingan Prinsip Good Corporate Governance pada Bank Konvensional dan Bank Syariah dalam Sistem Hukum di Indonesia Hasnati Hasnati; Sandra Dewi; Andrew Shandy Utama
Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law Vol 3, No 2 (2019): MIZAN
Publisher : Fakultas Agama Islam Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32507/mizan.v3i2.477

Abstract

AbstractIn terms of how to determine prices, banks are divided into two types, namely conventional banks and Islamic banks. Conventional banks and Islamic banks must apply the principles of Good Corporate Governance in their business activities because conventional banks and Islamic banks are intermediary institutions that function to collect funds from the public and channel these funds back to the public on the basis of trust. This research aims to explain the comparison of the principles of Good Corporate Governance in conventional banks and Islamic banks in Indonesia. The method used in this research is normative legal research, using a statutory approach. The principles of Good Corporate Governance, namely the principles of transparency, accountability, responsibility, independence and fairness. Basically, the application of the principles of Good Corporate Governance in conventional banks and Islamic banks is the same, because it refers to the 'Guidelines for Good Corporate Governance of the Indonesian Banking' issued by the National Committee on Governance Policy. The difference is the principle of Good Corporate Governance in Islamic banks is strictly regulated in Article 34 Paragraph (1) of Law No. 21/2008. Another difference lies in the Islamic principles used by Islamic banks because besides being fostered and supervised by the Financial Services Authority, Islamic banks also supervised by the National Sharia Council of the Council of Indonesian Ulama in general and the Sharia Supervisory Board in particular.Keywords: Good Corporate Governance Principles; Islamic Banking; Comparison AbstrakDari segi cara menentukan harga, bank dibedakan menjadi dua jenis, yaitu bank konvensional dan bank syariah. Bank konvensional maupun bank syariah wajib menerapkan prinsip Good Corporate Governance dalam kegiatan usahanya karena bank konvensional dan bank syariah merupakan lembaga intermediasi yang berfungsi menghimpun dana dari masyarakat dan menyalurkan kembali dana tersebut kepada masyarakat atas dasar kepercayaan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan perbandingan prinsip Good Corporate Governance pada bank konvensional dan bank syariah di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif, dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan. Prinsip Good Corporate Governance yaitu prinsip keterbukaan, akuntabilitas, tanggung jawab, independensi, dan kewajaran. Pada dasarnya, penerapan prinsip Good Corporate Governance pada bank konvensional dan bank syariah adalah sama, karena mengacu pada ‘Pedoman Good Corporate Governance Perbankan Indonesia’ yang dikeluarkan oleh Komite Nasional Kebijakan Governance. Perbedaannya adalah prinsip Good Corporate Governance pada bank syariah diatur secara tegas pada Pasal 34 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2008. Perbedaan lainnya terletak pada prinsip syariah yang digunakan oleh bank syariah karena selain dibina dan diawasi oleh Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, bank syariah juga diawasi oleh Dewan Syariah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia secara umum dan Dewan Pengawas Syariah secara khusus.Kata kunci: Prinsip Good Corporate Governance; Bank Syariah; Perbandingan
Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Pengelola Parkir Terhadap Kehilangan Kendaraan Muhammad Iqbal; Hasnati Hasnati; Indra Afrita
DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW Vol 5, No 1 (2022): Doktrina:Juornal of Law April 2022
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/doktrina.v5i1.6032

Abstract

Tanggung jawab pelaku usaha secara jelas telah diatur dalam Bab VI Pasal 19 sampai dengan Pasal 28 Undan-undang Perlindungan Konsumen. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Pengelola Parkir Terhadap Kehilangan Kendaraan dan Akibat Hukum Dari Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Pengelola Parkir Terhadap Kehilangan Kendaraan. Metode penelitian ini adalah Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Hasil penelitian tanggung jawab pelaku usaha pengelola parkir terhadap kehilangan kendaraan bahwa tanggung jawab pelaku usaha parkir terhadap kehilangan barang yang terdapat di dalam kendaraan konsumen yaitu menjadi tanggung jawab pengelola parkir, karena tanggung jawab pengelola parkir sebagai pihak penerima titipan adalah memelihara obyek titipan sebagaimana memelihara kepunyaan sendiri serta harus mengembalikan dalam wujud asalnya. Sehingga kehilangan barang yang terdapat di dalam kendaraan konsumen tetap menjadi tanggung jawab pengelola parkir. Akibat hukum tanggung jawab pelaku usaha pengelola parkir terhadap kehilangan kendaraan bahwa pelaku usaha bertanggungjawab dalam memberikan ganti kerugian atas terjadinya kerusakan, pencemaran dan memberikan ganti kerugian konsumen akibat mengkonsumsi barang dan/atau jasa yang dihasilkan atau diperdagangkan. Berdasarkan penjelasan tersebut maka konsumen pengguna jasa parkir apabila terjadi kehilangan ataupun kerugian berhak untuk menuntut kepada pihak pengelola parkir.
PERAN HAKIM PENGAWAS PADA KASUS KEPAILITAN BATAVIA AIR MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 37 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG KEPAILITAN Zul Hendrial; Hasnati; Andrew Shandy Utama
JOURNAL EQUITABLE Vol 7 No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37859/jeq.v7i1.3688

Abstract

Menurut penjelasan Pasal 2 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang disebutkan jenis kreditor ada tiga, yaitu kreditor konkuren, kreditor separatis, dan kreditor preferen. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan peran Hakim Pengawas pada kasus kepailitan Batavia Air. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Kepailitan adalah sita umum atas semua kekayaan debitor pailit yang pengurusan dan pemberesannya dilakukan oleh Kurator di bawah pengawasan Hakim Pengawas. Tugas dan kewenangan Hakim Pengawas dalam mengawasi pengurusan dan pemberesan harta pailit yaitu pemberian izin kepada Kurator, penetapan, persetujuan, pemberian usul, dan pemberian perintah kepada Kurator dalam mengurus dan membereskan harta debitor pailit. Dalam kasus kepailitan Batavia Air, pelaku usaha agen perjalanan wisata dikategorikan sebagai kreditur consuren dan diletakkan pada urutan terakhir. Padahal dalam Pasal 2 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang tidak ada kreditur konkuren.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KONSUMEN TERHADAP PERJANJIAN BAKU YANG MERUGIKAN KONSUMEN Krismat Hutagalung; Hasnati Hasnati; Indra Afrita
MIZAN, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10 No 2 (2021): Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Islam Kadiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32503/mizan.v10i2.1850

Abstract

Pada prinsipnya, pencantuman klausula baku dalam setiap perjanjian baku tidaklah dilarang. Yang dilarang hanyalah pencantuman klausula baku yang memberatkan atau merugikan konsumen sebagaimana yang diatur dalam UUPK. Selama pencantuman klausula baku tidaklah memenuhi kriteria dari 8 (delapan) daftar klausula baku terlarang yang disebutkan di dalam UUPK, maka pencantuman klausula baku tersebut masih dibenarkan dan dibolehkan. Klausula Baku menyebabkan pihak konsumen tidak dapat menentukan keinganannya dengan bebas. Dalam pusat perbelanjaan ditampilkan klausula dengan kalimat “Barang yang sudah dibeli tidak dapat ditukar kembali”. Atau “Barang yang tidak diambil 2 (dua) minggu, kami batalkan atau menjadi milik pihak manajemen”. Dan “barang pecah berarti membeli”. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah: 1) bagaimana perlindungan hukum konsumen terhadap perjanjian baku yang dibuat pelaku usaha?, 2) bagaimana akibat hukumnya perjanjian baku yang dibuat pelaku usaha?. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisa perlindungan hukum konsumen terhadap perjanjian baku yang dibuat pelaku usaha, untuk menganalisa akibat hukumnya perjanjian baku yang dibuat pelaku usaha. Penelitian ini penulis gunakan penelitian penelitian hukum normatif, teknik analisa data dengan menggunakan analisis kualitatif yaitu data yang penulis analisis menjelaskan dengan secara deskriptif dan kata-kata yang mudah dimengerti, dengan ditarik kesimpulan dengan menggunakan ataupun yang sejenisnya, kemudian ditarik kesimpulan secara deduktif. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini yakni sudah tercantum atau dituangkan dalam bentuk undang-undang, yaitu Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999. Hak-hak tersebut sudah diakui keberadaannya dan memiliki kepastian hukum yang diatur dalam undang-undang positif. Upaya hukum yang dilakukan oleh konsumen yang merasa dirugikan bisa menggunakan pasal-pasal dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 ini, namun dalam kaitannya perjanjian baku yang dibuat oleh pelaku usaha sekarang sudah dibuat dalam peraturan hukum.
Penyuluhan Hukum Mengenai Bentuk-Bentuk Badan Usaha Bagi Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah (UMKM) di Kelurahan Lembah Sari Kecamatan Rumbai Timur Kota Pekanbaru Hasnati Hasnati; Sandra Dewi; Andrew Shandy Utama
Jurnal Pengabdian Multidisiplin Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): Jurnal Pengabdian Multidisiplin
Publisher : Kuras Institute & Scidac Plus

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51214/japamul.v2i3.283

Abstract

The problem with partners in this community service activity is the people of Lembah Sari Village, Rumbai Timur District, Pekanbaru City regarding the forms of business entities for Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs). The solution offered in this community service activity is to increase the knowledge of the people of Lembah Sari Village, Rumbai Timur District, Pekanbaru City regarding forms of business entities for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs). The implementation method used in this community service activity is to use the lecture, dialogue, and discussion methods in order to provide legal counseling to the people of Lembah Sari Village. Participating partners in this community service activity are the Head of the Development and Community Empowerment Section of Lembah Sari Village and the Head of RW 07 Lembah Sari Village who participated in providing time, providing space, and supporting facilities, and presenting the community as activity participants. The output target of this community service activity is scientific articles published in national journals. The conclusion of this community service activity is that this activity has been successfully implemented and the benefits can be felt directly by the participants. Before the activity was carried out, of the 20 participants, only 19% answered correctly the material to be presented. Meanwhile, after the activity was carried out, 59% of participants answered that they had understood the material presented.
JURIDICAL REVIEW AGAINST REJECTION OF PEACE IN THE CASE OF BONDED COMPANY Alfitra Rinaldo; Hasnati; Indra Afrita
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol 2 No 2 (2021): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), February 2021
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (236.77 KB) | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v2i2.45

Abstract

Parties who take the initiative to apply for PKPU are generally debtors, namely debtors who are unable or expected to be unable to continue paying their debts, PKPU requests can also come from creditors who have calculated that the debtor will no longer be able to pay the debt. -the debt. The formulation of the problem in this research is how is the juridical review of the bankrupt company, how is it?Juridical Review of Refusal of Peace in Bankrupt Companies, and howLegal Consequences of Refusal of Reconciliation in Cases of Bankrupt Companies. The purpose of this study is to analyze the juridical review of the bankrupt company, to analyze the Juridical Review of Refusal of Peace in Bankrupt Companies, and To Analyze Legal Consequences of Refusal of Reconciliation in Cases of Bankrupt Companies.This research method is normative legal research. The conclusion in this study has answered the problems that arise, namely the Juridical Review of Bankrupt Companies that companies that have problems in their ability to fulfill their debt obligations take various alternative settlements. They can negotiate a request for debt relief, either in part or in full. They can also sell some of their assets or even their business, they can also convert the loan into equity participation, besides the possibility that the company can also negotiate a request for a postponement of debt repayment obligations as a final solution, then a solution is taken through the bankruptcy process if the peace process is not reachedJuridical Review of Refusal of Peace in Bankrupt Companies that Peace in bankruptcy is the right of the bankrupt debtor to file it. Legal Consequences of Refusal of Reconciliation in Cases of Bankrupt Companies that the continuation of the debtor's business due to the refusal of reconciliation is still possible in order to increase or at least maintain the value of the debtor's assets. The proposal to continue a bankrupt debtor company must be accepted if it is approved by the creditor representing ½ of all recognized and temporarily accepted receivables.
Kedudukan Majelis Kehormatan Disiplin Kedokteran Indonesia dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis Kastania Lintang; Hasnati Hasnati; Bahrun Azmi
Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 4 Issue 2 (2021) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, Islamic State University (UIN) Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (277.589 KB) | DOI: 10.24090/volksgeist.v4i2.5267

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the position of the Indonesian Medical Disciplinary Board (MKDKI) in the settlement of medical disputes. This study uses a normative juridical research method with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. Medical disputes due to alleged violations of medical discipline should be resolved through the Indonesian Medical Disciplinary Board, however currently there are still medical disputes that are reported to the court without going through the Indonesian Medical Disciplinary Board. The results of this study show that, there is still legal uncertainty regarding the resolution of medical disputes between doctors and patients, because the word "can" contained in paragraph (1) of the regulation on medical practice could mean that the complaint to the Indonesian Medical Disciplinary Board may or may not be made. Whereas in paragraph (3) it is stated that it is possible to resolve medical disputes through the courts, which can cause medical dispute resolution to be carried out through the courts directly.
Tanggungjawab Pelaku Usaha Rumah Makan Padang Terhadap Perolehan Sertifikasi Halal di Kota Pekanbaru: Responsibilities of Padang Restaurant Business Actors for Obtaining Halal Certification in Pekanbaru City Muhammad Yogi Riazmi Putra; Hasnati Hasnati; Yeni Triana Triana
DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Doktrina:Juornal of Law Oktober 2022
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/doktrina.v5i2.6694

Abstract

This writing is entitled the responsibility of business actors for Padang restaurants to obtain halal certification, it is necessary to pay attention to the safety of food products that are now freely circulating. Not only in terms of health but also guarantee the halal of the product. Although there have been various regulations made by the Government of Indonesia, but still found the existence foods that do not have label certified. The aim of this writing is to find out how the protection of consumer laws and legal consequences received by business actors related to the distribution of food products that are not halal certified. In this paper, the authors use normative research methods. Which examine and analyze the legislation and the linkage of legal principles relating to the labeling of halal food products between Law no. 8 of 1999 about protection of consumer with Law no. 33 of 2014 about Halal Product Guarantee. The results of the analysis obtained are the protection of consumer law against non halal certified food products arranged in Law no. 8 of 1999 about protection of consumer, Law no. 33 of 2014 about Halal Product Guarantee, and Government Regulation Number 69 years 1999 on about Label and Food advertising, while the legal effect that the business actor receives on the distribution of non halal certified food products is by imposing administrative punishment and criminal penalty.