Selfa Rosmita
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

KONTRIBUSI ILMU AL-MUNASABAH TERHADAP KONSISTENSI PESAN DAKWAH DALAM SURAH MAKKIYAH Selfa Rosmita; Achmad Abubakar; Halimah Basri
IMTIYAZ: Jurnal Ilmu Keislaman Vol. 9 No. 4 (2025): Desember
Publisher : LPPM STAI Muhammadiyah Probolinggo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46773/imtiyaz.v9i4.2826

Abstract

The science of Munasabah is a branch of Qur'anic jurisprudence that examines the interconnectedness and harmony of meaning between verses and suras in the Quran. This study aims to analyze the contribution of the science of Munasabah to the consistency of the da'wah message in the Makkiyah Surahs, particularly regarding key themes such as monotheism, prophecy, and the Day of Resurrection. This study employed a descriptive qualitative approach with library research methods. Data were collected through a review of classical and contemporary tafsir books, as well as the latest scientific literature relevant to the concept of munasabah and Qur'anic da'wah. The analysis was conducted thematically to identify patterns of verse relationships and meaning structures that reinforce the da'wah message. The results show that the science of Munasabah plays a crucial role in maintaining the coherence and unity of the da'wah theme in the Makkiyah Surahs. The logical interconnectedness between verses creates a continuous argumentation that reinforces the message of monotheism and the faith of Muslims in the early days of the prophethood. Munasabah also proves that the Qur'anic revelation is systematically structured and free from contradictions, allowing the message of da'wah to be conveyed rationally, persuasively, and contextually. Thus, the science of al-Munasabah not only reveals the miraculous aspects and rhetorical beauty of the Qur'an but also strengthens the effectiveness of Islamic da'wah as a complete and continuous system of theological communication.
Karl Marx's Socialist Economic Perspective Compared To Umar Bin Abdul Aziz's Islamic Economic Thoughts On Social Justice Pephitasya Juliana; Selfa Rosmita; Siradjuddin
Al-Kharaj: Journal of Islamic Economic and Business Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025): All articles in this issue include authors from 3 countries of origin (Indonesi
Publisher : LP2M IAIN Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24256/kharaj.v7i4.8581

Abstract

The concept of social justice in societal development. Karl Marx, through his socialist economic theory, highlighted the inequality born of the capitalist system, while Umar bin Abdul Aziz, in the Islamic economic tradition, emphasized the principle of equitable distribution of wealth based on sharia values. This study aims to compare the thoughts of Karl Marx and Umar bin Abdul Aziz from a social justice perspective, while identifying common ground and conceptual differences between the two. The study employed a qualitative approach through library research. The analysis was conducted using a comparative-descriptive method. The analysis shows that Karl Marx rejected capitalism because it resulted in class exploitation and proposed the abolition of private ownership of the means of production in order to create a classless society. In contrast, Umar bin Abdul Aziz maintained the recognition of individual ownership but emphasized distributive justice through zakat, taxes, and redistribution policies. The similarities between the two lie in the goal of creating social justice, but fundamentally different in their ideological foundations: Marx's origins stem from historical materialism, while Umar bin Abdul Aziz's is based on monotheism and Islamic law. This comparison of the thoughts of Karl Marx and Umar bin Abdul Aziz demonstrates that social justice can be understood from both secular and religious perspectives. Marx's thought offers a structural critique of capitalism, while Umar bin Abdul Aziz presents solutions rooted in moral and religious values. Both make important contributions to contemporary social justice discourse
KONTRIBUSI ILMU AL-MUNASABAH TERHADAP KONSISTENSI PESAN DAKWAH DALAM SURAH MAKKIYAH Selfa Rosmita; Achmad Abubakar; Halimah Basri
IMTIYAZ: Jurnal Ilmu Keislaman Vol. 9 No. 4 (2025): Desember
Publisher : LPPM STAI Muhammadiyah Probolinggo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46773/imtiyaz.v9i4.2826

Abstract

The science of Munasabah is a branch of Qur'anic jurisprudence that examines the interconnectedness and harmony of meaning between verses and suras in the Quran. This study aims to analyze the contribution of the science of Munasabah to the consistency of the da'wah message in the Makkiyah Surahs, particularly regarding key themes such as monotheism, prophecy, and the Day of Resurrection. This study employed a descriptive qualitative approach with library research methods. Data were collected through a review of classical and contemporary tafsir books, as well as the latest scientific literature relevant to the concept of munasabah and Qur'anic da'wah. The analysis was conducted thematically to identify patterns of verse relationships and meaning structures that reinforce the da'wah message. The results show that the science of Munasabah plays a crucial role in maintaining the coherence and unity of the da'wah theme in the Makkiyah Surahs. The logical interconnectedness between verses creates a continuous argumentation that reinforces the message of monotheism and the faith of Muslims in the early days of the prophethood. Munasabah also proves that the Qur'anic revelation is systematically structured and free from contradictions, allowing the message of da'wah to be conveyed rationally, persuasively, and contextually. Thus, the science of al-Munasabah not only reveals the miraculous aspects and rhetorical beauty of the Qur'an but also strengthens the effectiveness of Islamic da'wah as a complete and continuous system of theological communication.