Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Abdi Cendekia: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat JURNAL ILMIAH PENDIDIKAN KEBUDAYAAN DAN AGAMA Jurnal CENDIKIA ISNU Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU
Deni Afriansyah
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Application of Criminal Sanctions to Murder Cases According to Islamic Criminal Law Ilham Maulana; Ferdi Reynaldi; Deni Afriansyah; M. Ramzy Fernanda; Zaid Alfauza Marpaung
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Vol 1. No 3 Des 2024 : JCISNU
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v2i2.833

Abstract

The application of criminal sanctions in murder cases according to Islamic criminal law is a form of justice that balances the rights of the victim, the perpetrator, and the community. Islamic criminal law divides murder into three main categories: intentional murder (qatl 'amd), semi-intentional murder (qatl syibh 'amd), and unintentional murder (qatl khath'). Each type of murder has different legal consequences, with the main sanctions being qiyhas (retribution) for intentional murder, and diyat (financial compensation) and kaffarah (atonement) for semi-intentional and unintentional murder. This article aims to analyze the application of criminal sanctions in various murder cases from an Islamic legal perspective, and to explore the principles of justice, forgiveness, and the opportunity for peaceful resolution accommodated by the diyat mechanism. This study then compares sanctions in Islamic criminal law with those in modern criminal law systems, highlighting the uniqueness of the Islamic approach that prioritizes the balance between punishment and forgiveness. In conclusion, Islamic criminal law offers a flexible yet firm model of law enforcement, where justice does not only involve revenge, but also provides opportunities for reconciliation and peace.
Application of Criminal Sanctions to Murder Cases According to Islamic Criminal Law Ilham Maulana; Ferdi Reynaldi; Deni Afriansyah; M. Ramzy Fernanda; Zaid Alfauza Marpaung
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Vol 1. No 3 Des 2024 : JCISNU
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v2i2.833

Abstract

The application of criminal sanctions in murder cases according to Islamic criminal law is a form of justice that balances the rights of the victim, the perpetrator, and the community. Islamic criminal law divides murder into three main categories: intentional murder (qatl 'amd), semi-intentional murder (qatl syibh 'amd), and unintentional murder (qatl khath'). Each type of murder has different legal consequences, with the main sanctions being qiyhas (retribution) for intentional murder, and diyat (financial compensation) and kaffarah (atonement) for semi-intentional and unintentional murder. This article aims to analyze the application of criminal sanctions in various murder cases from an Islamic legal perspective, and to explore the principles of justice, forgiveness, and the opportunity for peaceful resolution accommodated by the diyat mechanism. This study then compares sanctions in Islamic criminal law with those in modern criminal law systems, highlighting the uniqueness of the Islamic approach that prioritizes the balance between punishment and forgiveness. In conclusion, Islamic criminal law offers a flexible yet firm model of law enforcement, where justice does not only involve revenge, but also provides opportunities for reconciliation and peace.
KEDUDUKAN MAHRAM DALAM HUKUM PERKAWINAN ISLAM: ANTARA TRADISI DANKEBUTUHAN KONTEMPORER Deni Afriansyah; Nia amira; Arya Farhan Azizi S; Zakaria Ahmad Mrp; Fera Aisah Bancin; Iwan Iwan
JURNAL ILMIAH PENDIDIKAN KEBUDAYAAN DAN AGAMA Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): April : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Kebudayaan dan Agama
Publisher : CV. ALIM'SPUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59024/jipa.v3i2.1133

Abstract

The position of the mahram in Islamic marriage law is an important aspect that regulates who can be married and who cannot. Mahrams are divided into two categories: mahram mu'abbad and mahram ghairu mu'abbad. Initially, this law was based on tradition and nasab, but in the contemporary context, the understanding of mahram needs to be adapted to societal developments and practical needs without ignoring sharia principles. This journal will analyze the position of the mahram in Islamic marriage law, between tradition and contemporary needs.
Batas Hak Imunitas Advokat dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia Asti Nurul Puspita; Deni Afriansyah
Abdi Cendekia : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol 5 No 4 (2026): Desember (In Press)
Publisher : Yayasan Zia Salsabila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61253/abdicendekia.v5i4.1401

Abstract

Hak kebebasan bagi profesi advokat adalah alat penting untuk memastikan pertahanan yang independen dan mempertahankan prinsip kesetaraan dalam keseimbangan kekuatan yang adil. Namun, perlindungan tersebut bukanlah kekebalan mutlak, tetapi kekebalan yang cukup (terbatas) yang sangat tergantung pada prinsip kebaikan hati dan etika profesi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi hak hukum keterbebasan, kriteria berdasarkan imunitas dalam penerapan keadilan, kebutuhan perlindungan dalam lingkungan anti-slapp, serta kontribusi dari pengacara islam dan lembaga perguruan tinggi hukum (PTAI/PTKIN) dalam pengadopsian hak bantuan hukum gratis (pro bono). Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah studi hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konstitusional dan konseptual. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa hak kebebasan bersuara dalam advokasi dibatasi secara mutlak baik berdasarkan standar subjektif maupun objektif. Ketika seorang pengacara dinyatakan bersalah melakukan tindakan melanggar hukum secara sengaja atau melakukan tindak pidana murni (mala in se), perlindungan kewenangan hukum tersebut berlaku sesuai dengan undang-undang. Imunitas perlindungan harus diterapkan secara proporsional agar dapat melindungi lingkungan hidup dari ancaman slapp dan memaksimalkan peran advokat publik serta akademisi, lebih dari sekadar keadilan sosial bagi masyarakat yang terpinggirkan.
Co-Authors Arya Farhan Azizi S Asti Nurul Puspita Fera Aisah Bancin Ferdi Reynaldi Ilham Maulana Iwan Iwan M. Ramzy Fernanda Nia amira Zaid Alfauza Marpaung Zakaria Ahmad Mrp