Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Synergy: Journal of Collaborative Sciences Ethos and Pragmatic Law Review
Muhamad Ridho
Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Banten, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Perspectives on the Use of AI in Business Decision-Making in the Digital Age Raine Graciea Firdaus; Muhamad Miftahulloh; Muhamad Ridho; Hana Nailah Abiliah; Frilla Erita Foessy; Najma El Ulya Rahmania; Muhammad Fauzi Rais Lutfi
Synergy: Journal of Collaborative Sciences Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Collaborative Solutions for Contemporary Global Challenges
Publisher : Yayasan Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Sisi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69836/synergy.v2i1.223

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into business decision-making processes has significantly transformed corporate operations while simultaneously raising complex legal issues, particularly concerning liability for decisions generated autonomously by algorithmic systems. This study analyzes the legal position of artificial intelligence within Indonesia’s regulatory framework and evaluates the extent to which the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law) can serve as a legal basis for accountability when AI-generated decisions result in losses. Employing a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, this research examines the classification of AI as an electronic agent and its implications for determining business liability. The analysis demonstrates that, under Indonesian positive law, AI has not yet been recognized as an independent legal subject, resulting in legal responsibility remaining with developers, operators, or business entities that deploy AI systems. Nevertheless, the absence of specific and comprehensive AI regulations creates legal uncertainty, particularly in light of AI’s autonomous operation and opaque decision-making mechanisms. This study concludes that although the ITE Law provides an initial normative foundation for regulating AI-related accountability, it remains insufficient to address the legal complexity, ethical concerns, and risks inherent in AI-driven business decision-making.
Analisis Penolakan Kasasi Pembatalan Izin Lingkungan PT Indo Asiana Lestari bagi Hak Masyarakat Adat Awyu Desty Yusmiyati; Karina Puspitasari Lubis; Arif Fajrurrachman; Muhamad Ridho
Ethos and Pragmatic Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Law, Governance, and Justice
Publisher : Yayasan Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Sisi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69836/ethos.v2i1.203

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji analisis yuridis penolakan kasasi Mahkamah Agung Nomor 458 K/TUN-LH/2024 terhadap gugatan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Suku Awyu untuk pembatalan izin lingkungan hidup PT Indo Asiana Lestari di Boven Digoel, Papua Selatan. Sengketa berpusat pada Izin Nomor 82 Tahun 2021 yang diduga melanggar hak ulayat, asas kecermatan dan keterbukaan (AUPB), serta Free Prior Informed Consent (FPIC), dengan ancaman konversi 36.096,4 hektare hutan primer menjadi perkebunan kelapa sawit yang merusak biodiversitas, sumber penghidupan adat, dan lingkungan ekologis. Rumusan masalah meliputi dasar hukum gugatan, penegakan asas Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN), serta implikasi terhadap hak konstitusional lingkungan dan wilayah adat. Pendekatan yuridis normatif digunakan dengan metode perundang-undangan, kasus (putusan PTUN Jayapura No. 6/G/LH/2023/PTUN.JPR, PTTUN Manado, MA), dan konseptual, menganalisis kualitatif bahan primer seperti UU No. 51/2009 PTUN, UU No. 32/2009 PPLH, UUD 1945 Pasal 18B ayat 2, serta Putusan MK No. 35/PUU-X/2012 melalui penalaran deduktif. Temuan utama mengungkap formalisme hukum acara PTUN gagal wujudkan keadilan substantif, karena penolakan daluwarsa 90 hari (Pasal 55 UU PTUN) abaikan isolasi geografis masyarakat adat, pelanggaran precautionary principle, dan dissenting opinion hakim. Putusan ini perkuat dominasi kepentingan ekonomi korporasi, implikasikan deforestasi Papua, erosi hak ulayat, serta pelemahan akses keadilan ekologis. Rekomendasi mencakup harmonisasi rechtszekerheid dengan substantive justice lewat peran hakim aktif (dominus litis) dan implementasi otonomi khusus Papua.
Co-Authors Arif Fajrurrachman Desty Yusmiyati Frilla Erita Foessy Hana Nailah Abiliah Karina Puspitasari Lubis Muhamad Miftahulloh Muhammad Fauzi Rais Lutfi Najma El Ulya Rahmania Raine Graciea Firdaus