Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DETAINEE AND INMATE CARE FUNCTION AT THE BARRU CLASS IIB DETENTION CENTER IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF LAW NUMBER 22 OF 2022 Amsar Amir; Khaerul Mannan; Muhammad Natsir; Bakhtiar Tijjang; Muhammad Sabir Rahman
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/morfai.v5i6.4510

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of the care function for detainees and prisoners at the Class IIB Barru Detention Center based on the provisions of Law Number 22 of 2022 concerning Corrections. The analysis focuses on three main aspects: the fulfillment of basic rights in the form of health and nutritional needs, rehabilitation programs, and protection for vulnerable groups. The results show that the detention center has attempted to carry out its care function through basic health services, food distribution, and coaching activities, although various structural limitations limit the quality of services. Significant overcapacity conditions impact the level of environmental health, the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs, and meeting the special needs of inmates, especially those with disabilities and chronic illnesses. Limited infrastructure and the number of health workers and correctional officers exacerbate challenges in health maintenance and management of residential space. The study's conclusion confirms that the implementation of care has not fully met the mandate of the law due to high pressure on detention capacity. Therefore, improvements in facilities, strengthening human resources, and ongoing policy support are needed to optimally implement humanitarian principles in correctional facilities.
Perjanjian Elektronik dalamTransaksi E- Commerce menurut KUHP Perdata dan Undang-Undang ITE: Tinjauan Komparatif Nur Qalbi Putri Ramadhani Ahmad; Muhammad Sabir Rahman; Aksah Kasim; Sunardi Purwanda; Baktiar Tijjang
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Juni 2026
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i3.2091

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan gambaran perbandingan perlindungan hukum terkait perjanjian elektronik dalam transaksi E-Commerce, dan menentukan perbandingan mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa terkait perjanjian elektronik dalam transaksi E-Commerce. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan studi literatur, jenis dan sumber bahan hukum menggunakan bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, dan bahan hukum tersier. Penelitian ini juga menggunakan teori perjanjian kepercayaan, teori hukum perbandingan, dan teori perilaku terencana. Analisis data akan dipelajari secara kualitatif preskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perbandingan perlindungan hukum terkait perjanjian elektronik dalam transaksi E-Commerce hanya tercantum secara lebih spesifik dalam Undang-Undang ITE dan perbandingan mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa terkait perjanjian elektronik dalam transaksi E-Commerce tercantum secara luas dan spesifik dalam KUHP dan Undang-Undang ITE.
Kajian Hukum Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata Melalui Gugatan Sederhana Berbasis E-Court di Pengadilan Negeri Sidenreng Rappang Herul Herul; Sunardi Purwanda; Muhammad Sabir Rahman; Bakhtiar Tijjang; Aksah Kasim
Reslaj: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal Vol. 8 No. 7 (2026): RESLAJ: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal
Publisher : Intitut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/reslaj.v8i7.13194

Abstract

This study aims to examine and analyze the implementation of civil case resolution via E-Court-based small claims procedures at the District Court, the factors hindering the implementation of electronic small claims at the Sidrap District Court, and the obstacles encountered in this process. The study employs a normative-empirical research design, utilizing both statutory and socio-legal approaches. Data sources include both primary and secondary data. Data analysis is conducted through observational-sensory and theoretical-rational methods, employing a reasoning model that proceeds from inductive logic to deductive logic. The study finds that the implementation of civil case resolution via E-Court-based small claims at the District Court is governed by Supreme Court Regulation No. 4 of 2019 (amending Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2015 on Small Claims Resolution Procedures) and Supreme Court Regulation No. 7 of 2022 (on Electronic Case Administration and Court Proceedings). The process comprises the following stages: registration (E-Filing), payment (E-Payment), review of claim completeness, appointment of the presiding judge and substitute clerk, summoning of parties (E-Summons), conciliation, trial proceedings (E-Litigation), and the rendering of the judgment. In the E-Court system, judges upload official copies of rulings—electronically signed using digital certificates (e-sign) from the Electronic Certification Center (BSrE)—into the SIPP and E-Court systems. Factors hindering the implementation of electronic-based small claims lawsuits at the Sidrap District Court, as well as obstacles in resolving such civil cases, include: administrative factors (errors in uploading or transmitting files/documents, identity verification issues, problems with advance court fees, administrative errors in summoning parties, and delays in sending hearing documents); public factors (legal understanding and culture, where the public lacks knowledge regarding E-Court and still views face-to-face court services as necessary); and infrastructure factors (issues with internet networks and the E-Court system/application). Additionally, regulatory obstacles exist regarding Supreme Court rules on E-Court and small claims; these regulations address procedural aspects but fail to provide mechanisms for resolving issues that arise during the actual implementation of electronic-based small claims proceedings.
IMPLIKASI KEGAGALAN DIVERSI TERHADAP PENJATUHAN PIDANA PENJARA DAN PELATIHAN KERJA PADA ANAK (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NO.1/PID.SUS-ANAK/2025/PN.PRE) Trixie Fellicia Lubis; Muhammad Sabir Rahman; Ardiyanti Aris; Muh Akbar Fhad Syahril; Bakhtiar Tijjang
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 06 (2026): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i06.2046

Abstract

Artikel ini berfokus pada studi hukum normatif tentang penerapan hukum sistem peradilan pidana anak, khususnya meneliti Keputusan No. 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/Pn.Pre yang dikeluarkan oleh pengadilan di Kota Parepare. Studi ini menggunakan pendekatan legislatif dan analitis untuk meninjau pertimbangan hukum yang digunakan oleh hakim. Sumber materi hukum yang digunakan meliputi materi hukum primer dan sekunder, yang kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif dan preskriptif. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam Keputusan No. 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2025/PN.Pre menunjukkan bahwa kegagalan pengalihan normatif tidak menghilangkan orientasi perlindungan dan bimbingan anak sebagaimana diamanatkan oleh Undang-Undang SPPA. Hakim masih menempatkan hukuman penjara sebagai upaya terakhir dengan durasi terbatas, berdasarkan tingkat kesalahan, keseriusan kejahatan narkotika, dan kepentingan pencegahan umum. Kombinasi hukuman penjara dengan pelatihan kerja mencerminkan pendekatan hibrida antara tindakan represif dan rehabilitatif yang sejalan dengan prinsip kepentingan terbaik anak. Hal ini menegaskan bahwa setelah kegagalan upaya pengalihan kasus, Undang-Undang SPPA tetap menjadi kerangka kerja utama untuk menghukum anak-anak guna memastikan rehabilitasi dan masa depan mereka.
LEGAL STUDY OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION OF M E ACTS AGAINST THE LAW OF PLACING ADVERTISEMENTS WITHOUT RIGHTS Sitti Samia; Muhammad Sabir Rahman; Aksah Kasim; Bakhtiar Tijjang; Kairuddin Karim
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20032762

Abstract

This study aims to determine and analyze the process of resolving disputes over the unlawful act of installing billboards and the legal consequences that occur if the billboard is installed incorrectly without rights. This study uses a normative research type with a legislative approach and an analytical approach. The types of legal sources use primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. Legal analysis will be studied in a qualitative prescriptive manner. The results of this study are the process of resolving disputes over the unlawful act of installing billboards, namely there are 2 paths or mechanisms, namely identifying or proving that the installation of billboards without rights meets the elements in Article 1364 of the Civil Code. In the settlement there are 2 efforts, namely Non-Litigation Efforts (Outside the Court) by seeking Negotiation, mediation, and Conciliation. However, if the Non-Litigation Effort is not successful and effective, then the Court Effort by filing a civil lawsuit in the Court can be carried out with the initial stage of filing a lawsuit (registration of the lawsuit, appointment of a panel of judges and determination of the trial date and mediation efforts), the examination stage (reading of the lawsuit, the defendant's response, replies and duplicates), the evidence stage (letters, witnesses, experts and others) and the final stage of the Conclusion and decision. After a court decision that has permanent legal force (completed or no legal efforts), then the execution will be carried out according to the wording of the decision and the legal consequences that occur if the error in installing a billboard without rights is the result of civil law related to the error in installing a billboard without rights, namely the perpetrator or installer is obliged to make compensation, stop the use of land without permission while dismantling the billboard without rights and returning the condition of the land or building to its original state.