Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 16 Documents
Search

تحليل الرواة الذين حُكِمَ عليهم بالمطروح في كتاب سير أعلام النبلاء (دراسة استقرائية مقارنة) Marwan Mas'ud; Bisri Tujang; Muhammad Fadhil; Teguh Dwi Prayoga
AL-ATSAR: Jurnal Ilmu Hadits Vol 4 No 1 (2026): Al-Atsar: Jurnal Ilmu Hadits
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Dirasat Islamiyah Imam Syafi'i Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37397/al-atsarjurnalilmuhadits.v4i1.1365

Abstract

يهدف هذا البحث إلى معرفة مكانة الرواة الذين حُكِمَ عليهم بالمطروح في كتاب سير أعلام النبلاء. وقد استخدم الباحث المنهج النوعي القائم على الدراسة المكتبية. أما البيانات المعتمدة في هذا البحث فهي بيانات أولية وثانوية، وتم تحليلها تحليلاً وصفياً. والإطار النظري المستخدم هو نظرية الجرح والتعديل، ثم استُخلصت النتائج بمنهج استدلالي استنباطي. تُظهر نتائج البحث أن المطروح في اصطلاح علم الحديث يدلّ على ضعفٍ شديدٍ يوجب ردَّ الرواية وعدم اعتبارها حجّة، بخلاف استعماله اللغوي الذي لا يستلزم القدح. من خلال دراسةٍ استقرائيةٍ مقارنةٍ لكتاب سير أعلام النبلاء، يمكن استخلاصُ أن الحكم على الراوي الموصوف بلفظ مطروح يتوقف على سياق استعماله. فإذا استُخدم مصطلح مطروح استعمالًا اصطلاحيًا في علم الجرح والتعديل — كما هو الحال في عبد القدوس بن حبيب وسهل بن عمار — فإن ذلك يدلّ على جرحٍ شديدٍ جدًّا، بل قد يقترن باتهامٍ بالكذب، مما يترتب عليه ردُّ روايته ردًّا مطلقًا وعدم ثبوت أيّ حجّيةٍ لها. أمّا إذا استُعمل لفظ مطروح بالمعنى اللغوي، كما في محمد بن الهيثم بن خالد، فلا يُراد به القدح في الراوي، وإنما هو وصفٌ لحال التحديث وأسلوب الرواية. وبما أنّ الأئمة قد حكموا عليه بأنه ثقة أو صدوق مستور، فإن روايته تبقى مقبولةً ومعتبرة. وبناءً على ذلك، فليس كلُّ إطلاقٍ للفظ مطروح يستلزم ردَّ الرواية، بل يجب فهمه في ضوء السياق وميزان تقويم الأئمة النقاد.
The Authority of Ḥadīth in Tafsīr bi al-Maʾthūr: A Critical Study of Fabricated Narrations on the Virtues of Sūrat Yāsīn in al-Durr al-Manthūr Hendri Waluyo Lensa; Marwan Mas’ud; Solehuddin Solehuddin; Dafif Atsal
Tut Wuri Handayani : Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Maret 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Riset Ilmiah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Artikel ini mengkaji secara kritis sejumlah hadis tentang keutamaan (faḍāʾil) Surah Yāsīn sebagaimana tercantum dalam al-Durr al-Manthūr fī al-Tafsīr bi al-Maʾthūr karya al-Suyūṭī. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan kritik hadis klasik, penelitian ini menelaah sanad (isnād) dan teks (matn) dari riwayat-riwayat tersebut melalui metode naqd al-isnād dan naqd al-matn, serta merujuk pada penilaian para ulama jarḥ wa al-taʿdīl baik klasik maupun kontemporer. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tidak semua riwayat yang dikategorikan sebagai maʾthūr dalam tafsir Al-Qur’an berbasis riwayat memenuhi standar metodologis yang dapat diterima. Penelitian ini mengidentifikasi empat (4) hadis tentang keutamaan Surah Yāsīn yang telah diklasifikasikan sebagai hadis palsu (mawḍūʿ) oleh para ulama hadis klasik dan kontemporer, sehingga tidak dibenarkan untuk diriwayatkan maupun diamalkan. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa karakter kompilatif hadis-hadis yang terdapat dalam al-Durr al-Manthūr fī al-Tafsīr bi al-Maʾthūr tidak dapat dilepaskan dari kecenderungan metodologis al-Suyūṭī, yang secara luas dikenal memiliki sikap relatif longgar (tasāhul) dalam mengutip hadis lemah dan palsu dalam karya-karyanya, serta dari mekanisme transmisi hadis yang berkembang pada konteks sejarah zamannya. Penelitian ini berkontribusi dalam penguatan studi hadis dengan menghadirkan pembacaan kritis terhadap tafsir Al-Qur’an berbasis riwayat, meskipun ditulis oleh seorang ulama besar yang karya-karyanya telah diterima dan digunakan secara luas oleh masyarakat. Selain itu, penelitian ini mendorong umat Islam untuk bersikap lebih selektif dalam mengamalkan hadis-hadis faḍāʾil al-aʿmāl dalam praktik keagamaan sehari-hari. This article critically examines a number of ḥadīths concerning the virtues (faḍāʾil) of Sūrat Yāsīn as recorded in al-Durr al-Manthūr fī al-Tafsīr bi al-Maʾthūr by al-Suyūṭī. Employing a classical ḥadīth criticism approach, this study investigates the chains of transmission (isnād) and textual content (matn) of these narrations through the methods of naqd al-isnād and naqd al-matn, while also referring to the assessments of classical and contemporary scholars of jarḥ wa al-taʿdīl. The findings reveal that not all narrations categorized as maʾthūr within tradition-based Qurʾānic exegesis meet acceptable methodological standards. The study identifies four (4) ḥadīths on the virtues of Sūrat Yāsīn that have been classified as fabricated (mawḍūʿ) by both classical and contemporary ḥadīth scholars, rendering them impermissible to transmit or practice. These findings indicate that the compilatory nature of the ḥadīths included in al-Durr al-Manthūr fī al-Tafsīr bi al-Maʾthūr cannot be separated from al-Suyūṭī’s methodological tendency, which is widely recognized for its relative leniency (tasāhul) in citing weak and fabricated ḥadīths in his works, as well as from the mechanisms of ḥadīth transmission prevalent in his historical context. This research contributes to the strengthening of ḥadīth studies by offering a critical reading of tradition-based Qurʾānic exegesis, even when authored by a renowned scholar whose works have been widely received and utilized by the public. Furthermore, the study encourages Muslims to adopt a heightened level of selectivity in the application of faḍāʾil al-aʿmāl ḥadīths within everyday religious practice.
Vasectomy as Social Assistance Policy Discourse: A Normative Juridical Analysis from Ibn ʿUthaymīn’s Fatwa Akhmad Husaini; Marwan Mas'ud; Goliz Cahyadi; Sylvano Wijaya Aji Pratama
JURNAL AT-TURAS Vol 13, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/at-turas.v13i1.13486

Abstract

This research examines the normative and ethical implications of the West Java Governor’s statement proposing vasectomy as a prerequisite for prioritizing social assistance, by addressing the central question of whether such policy discourse constitutes a violation of maqāṣid al-syarīʿah and generates legal–ethical conflicts within Islamic and national legal frameworks. Employing a qualitative approach with library-based research methodology, this study analyzes secondary data through descriptive and content analysis. The analytical framework is grounded in maqāṣid al-syarīʿah theory, while conclusions are drawn using a deductive reasoning approach. The findings demonstrate that conditioning social assistance on vasectomy represents a normative inconsistency that contradicts the principle of preserving progeny (ḥifẓ al-nasl), as articulated in Ibn al-ʿUthaymīn’s fatwas, which prohibit permanent sterilization except in cases of medical necessity. Furthermore, the study identifies significant legal and ethical tensions, including the erosion of religious commitment, distortion of the concept of tawakkul, and violations of bodily autonomy and reproductive rights as protected under national law and human rights norms. The research concludes that such policy discourse risks producing structural injustice against economically marginalized groups. As an alternative, this study proposes rights-based and maqāṣid-oriented solutions, including sustainable economic empowerment programs, comprehensive reproductive health education, voluntary use of non-permanent contraception, and the reinforcement of a fair, non-discriminatory social security system to achieve public welfare without compromising fundamental religious values and human rights.
Preventing Bullying in Pesantren: A Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah and Hadith Perspective on the Role of the Sakinah Family Irsyad Hasan; Marwan Mas'ud; Teguh Dwi Prayoga
Al-Insyiroh: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : LPPPM STAI Darul Hikmah Bangkalan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35309/alinsyiroh.v12i1.633

Abstract

This study examines the concept of the sakinah family as a preventive framework against bullying from a hadith-based perspective. Employing a qualitative library research design, the primary data sources consist of canonical hadith collections—particularly Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, Sunan Abī Dāwūd, and Sunan al-Tirmidhī—. Secondary sources include contemporary scholarly works on bullying, child psychology, and Islamic family studies published in peer-reviewed journals. Using thematic hadith analysis (al-dirāsah al-mawḍū‘iyyah) and a socio-normative approach, this study identifies four operative mechanisms through which the sakinah family model functions in preventing bullying: (1) the internalization of compassion (raḥmah) through prophetic parenting patterns, (2) the cultivation of emotional regulation based on the prohibition of anger-driven aggression, (3) dialogical conflict resolution modeled in the Prophet’s household interactions, and (4) moral-social accountability reinforced through teachings on dignity (karāmah) and the prohibition of humiliation. These mechanisms operate at the levels of character formation, emotional development, and social behavior control within the family structure. The novelty of this research lies in its analytical reconstruction of hadith narratives into a concrete preventive model against bullying, moving beyond general normative discussions of the sakinah family toward a structured socio-ethical framework grounded in prophetic traditions. By bridging classical hadith scholarship and contemporary bullying discourse, this study offers a conceptually integrative and practically applicable contribution to Islamic family studies
INTEGRATING ISLAMIC LEGAL LITERACY AND FAMILY SUPPORT IN SHAPING MARRIAGE READINESS: A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING APPROACH: Integrasi Literasi Hukum Islam dan Dukungan Keluarga dalam Membentuk Kesiapan Menikah: Pendekatan Model Persamaan Struktural Sabilul Muhtadin; Abd.Muthalib; Marwan Mas'ud; Muhammad Yassir; Riyan Maulana Sidiq
Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen Vol. 19 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL ILMU KELUARGA DAN KONSUMEN 19.1
Publisher : Faculty of Social Science and Human Ecology, IPB University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24156/jikk.2026.19.1.15

Abstract

Marriage readiness among Muslim young adults is increasingly shaped by the interplay between cognitive and social factors in contemporary society. This study examines the direct and indirect relationships between Fiqh al-Munakahat literacy, family support, and marriage readiness among students in Islamic higher education institutions in Indonesia. A quantitative approach using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was applied to data collected from 155 students through purposive sampling. The findings reveal that Fiqh al-Munakahat literacy significantly influences both family support (β = 0.456, p < 0.001) and marriage readiness (β = 0.399, p < 0.001), while family support also significantly affects marriage readiness (β = 0.296, p < 0.001). The results indicate that cognitive factors play a more dominant role than social factors, suggesting that students increasingly rely on religio-legal understanding and self-confidence when preparing for married life. These findings contribute to the development of an integrated cognitive-social framework for strengthening marriage preparation programs in Islamic educational contexts.
Integration of Collaborative Communication in the Education of Islamic Economic Law from the Perspective of Hadith and Maqāṣid Al-Sharīʿah Muhammad Fahrurrozi; Marwan Mas’ud; Nur Anisa Rizqi; Fachrul Aziz Alhamdani; Teguh Dwi Prayoga
JURNAL AT-TURAS Vol 13, No 3 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/at-turas.v13i3.15713

Abstract

The limited public understanding of Islamic economic jurisprudence despite the rapid expansion of the Islamic economic system has contributed to persistent misconceptions in contemporary muʿāmalāt. This study aims to analyze the integration of collaborative communication into Islamic economic law education from the perspectives of Prophetic ḥadīth and maqāṣid al-sharīʿah according to al-Shāṭibī, and to formulate its implications for participatory Islamic economic education. This qualitative library research analyzes classical ḥadīth collections, scholarly commentaries, and relevant peer-reviewed literature using a thematic ḥadīth approach and descriptive-analytical reasoning. The analysis focuses on Prophetic traditions concerning transactional disclosure, dialogical clarification, dispute resolution, and the prohibition of deception, and interprets their communicative values through Collaborative Communication Theory and al-Shāṭibī’s maqāṣid framework. The findings reveal four interconnected principles of collaborative communication in Islamic economic education: shared understanding, information transparency, trust-building, and mutual responsibility. These principles are reflected in the Prophet’s ﷺ guidance concerning protection from transactional deception, dialogical clarification of economic rulings, peaceful resolution of sales disputes, and disclosure of defects in goods. From the maqāṣid perspective, their integration supports ḥifẓ al-dīn through religious understanding, ḥifẓ al-ʿaql through critical economic literacy, and ḥifẓ al-māl through the prevention of harmful and non-compliant practices. The study contributes a normative-educational model linking Prophetic communication values with collaborative learning and maqāṣid-oriented outcomes. It recommends strengthening dialogical, transparent, and multi-stakeholder approaches in Islamic economic education and further empirical research to assess their implementation