Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.67
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities JIPM: Jurnal Indragiri Penelitian Multidisiplin Celebes Journal of Community Services
Iwan Rasiwan
Universitas Kartamulia Purwakarta
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Discretionary Authority Of Law Enforcement Officials In The Settlement Of Criminal Cases Based On Restorative Justice Deny; Eko Budi Sariyono; Iwan Rasiwan; Johannes Triestanto; Zulkarnain S
International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol. 8 No. 1: Januari 2026
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/ijhess.v8i1.9965

Abstract

Discretion exercised by law enforcement officials constitutes an inherent authority within the law enforcement function to make decisions or take actions based on professional judgment, particularly in circumstances that are not comprehensively regulated by statutory provisions. In the development of modern criminal law, discretionary power has gained increasing relevance, especially when associated with the application of a restorative justice approach that emphasizes victim recovery, offender accountability, and the restoration of social harmony within the community. This article aims to examine the scope of discretionary authority held by law enforcement agencies in resolving criminal cases through a restorative justice framework in Indonesia. The discussion focuses on the factors that encourage the use of discretion, the normative and ethical limitations governing its application, the roles of various law enforcement institutions within the criminal justice system, as well as the challenges encountered in practical implementation. The research employs a normative juridical approach, utilizing library-based data collection methods through the analysis of statutory regulations, legal doctrines, and relevant national legal journal publications. The data are analyzed using a descriptive-analytical method to assess the alignment between legal norms and law enforcement practices. The findings indicate that law enforcement discretion can serve as an effective instrument in supporting the implementation of restorative justice, particularly in certain criminal cases with limited social impact. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of discretionary practices is highly dependent on the consistent application of prudential principles, proportionality, legal certainty, utility, and participatory transparency involving victims, offenders, and the community. In the absence of clear guidelines and adequate oversight mechanisms, the exercise of discretion may lead to legal uncertainty and unequal justice. Therefore, strengthening regulatory frameworks and enhancing the capacity of law enforcement personnel are essential prerequisites for optimizing discretion within a restorative justice-based criminal justice system.
The Effectiveness Of Sharia Arbitration In Resolving Sharia Business Disputes Daffa Maulana Adha Herdatama; Dafa’ Alifta Akbar Susilo; Atin Meriati Isnaini; Johannes Triestanto; Iwan Rasiwan
International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol. 8 No. 1: Januari 2026
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/ijhess.v8i1.10013

Abstract

The rapid growth of the Islamic business sector in Indonesia necessitates dispute resolution mechanisms that are not only legally sound but also aligned with the principles of Islamic law. Sharia arbitration emerges as an alternative dispute resolution outside the court system, offering a more flexible, efficient, and substantively just process. A key institution in the implementation of sharia arbitration in Indonesia is the National Sharia Arbitration Board, which resolves disputes based on the parties’ agreements while adhering to Islamic values. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of sharia arbitration in resolving Islamic business disputes, focusing on its legal foundation, cost and time efficiency, parties’ satisfaction, and implementation challenges. The research employs a qualitative method, specifically library research, through a review of legislation, national scholarly journals, and relevant literature on arbitration and Islamic finance. The findings indicate that sharia arbitration is generally effective in resolving Islamic business disputes, particularly due to its straightforward procedures, relatively short resolution period, and ability to maintain harmonious business relationships. However, several obstacles persist, including limited public understanding of sharia arbitration, a shortage of arbitrators with specialized expertise in Islamic finance, and challenges in the enforcement of arbitration awards. To enhance its effectiveness, institutional strengthening, broader socialization, and human resource development are essential to optimize the role of sharia arbitration in Indonesia’s Islamic business sector.
Restorative Justice as a Legal Policy on Criminal Punishment: An Integrative Study of Legal Certainty and Substantive Justice Deny Deny; Wolter Junaedi Nurhamidin; Ana Maria Gadi Djou; Yulianis Safrinadiya Rahman; Iwan Rasiwan
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i3.3159

Abstract

The concept of restorative justice has emerged as a contemporary paradigm in modern criminal justice systems, shifting the focus away from mere retribution toward the restoration of social relationships and the reparation of harm suffered by victims. This transformation reflects a broader change in the direction of criminal law policy toward a more humane and justice-oriented approach. This study aims to examine restorative justice within the framework of criminal law policy, with particular emphasis on the integration of legal certainty and substantive justice. The research employs a normative legal method, utilizing conceptual, statutory, and comparative approaches to achieve a comprehensive analysis. The findings indicate that restorative justice holds significant potential in reconciling the tension between formal legal procedures and the evolving sense of justice within society. However, its implementation continues to face several challenges, including inconsistencies in law enforcement practices, limited technical regulations, and the need for a paradigm shift among legal practitioners. Therefore, strengthening policy frameworks and establishing clear operational guidelines are essential to ensure the effective and consistent application of restorative justice.
Peran Ombudsman Dalam Pengawasan Pelayanan Publik Di Indonesia: The Role of the Ombudsman in Supervising Public Services in Indonesia Johannes Triestanto; Rusli Jalil; Yulianis Safrinadiya Rahman; Andika Adhyaksa; Iwan Rasiwan
Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains Vol. 9 No. 5: Mei 2026
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/jks.v9i5.10458

Abstract

Salah satu indikator utama dalam menilai keberhasilan penyelenggaraan pemerintahan yang berorientasi pada prinsip good governance adalah pelayanan publik. Kualitas pelayanan yang luar biasa menggambarkan adanya transparansi, akuntabilitas, serta profesionalitas aparatur negara dalam memenuhi kebutuhan masyarakat. Namun demikian, dalam praktiknya, Penyelenggaraan pelayanan publik di Indonesia masih menghadapi banyak masalah, terutama yang berkaitan dengan praktik maladministrasi, seperti penundaan berlarut, penyalahgunaan wewenang, hingga pelayanan yang diskriminatif. Kondisi ini menunjukkan perlunya mekanisme pengawasan yang efektif dan independen untuk memastikan hak-hak masyarakat dipenuhi sebagai pengguna layanan publik. Dalam konteks tersebut, Ombudsman Republik Indonesia adalah lembaga negara independen yang bertanggung jawab untuk memeriksa bagaimana pelayanan publik dijalankan. Peran Ombudsman dalam mengawasi pelayanan publik di Indonesia adalah subjek penelitian ini. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif. Pendekatan ini didasarkan pada penelitian kepustakaan terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan serta literatur ilmiah yang relevan. Penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Ombudsman memiliki peran yang sangat strategis, seperti menerima dan memeriksa laporan masyarakat, melakukan investigasi terhadap dugaan maladministrasi, serta memberikan rekomendasi kepada instansi penyelenggara pelayanan publik. Selain itu, Ombudsman juga berperan dalam upaya pencegahan melalui edukasi dan sosialisasi kepada masyarakat dan aparatur negara. Meskipun demikian, efektivitas pengawasan yang dilakukan masih menghadapi sejumlah kendala, seperti rendahnya tingkat kepatuhan instansi terhadap rekomendasi Ombudsman, keterbatasan sumber daya, serta minimnya kesadaran masyarakat dalam melaporkan maladministrasi.
Penerapan Manajemen Berbasis Karakter Melalui Sosialisasi dan Pendampingan Budaya Kerja Pancawaluya untuk Meningkatkan Integritas SDM Sekolah. Mardiman Mardiman; Taufik Taufik; Tyan Tasa; Muhamad Iqbal Ansori Firdaus; Iwan Rasiwan; Muhammad Fathurrahman; Reski Mulia; Yoga Nugraha; Muhammad Fachmi; Jeki Purnama Putra
Celebes Journal of Community Services Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): December - May
Publisher : Yayasan Vifada Cendikia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37531/celeb.v5i1.3473

Abstract

Pendidikan karakter melalui program Tatanen di Bale Atikan (TdBA) di Purwakarta telah berhasil membentuk karakter siswa, namun integritas SDM sekolah sebagai penggerak utama program masih menjadi tantangan. Pengabdian ini bertujuan meningkatkan integritas guru melalui penerapan manajemen berbasis karakter berbasis nilai Pancawaluya Welulang, Wawuh, Wani, Welas, dan Wiwaha melalui sosialisasi dan pendampingan partisipatif. Kegiatan dilaksanakan di SDN 3 Tegaldatar, Kecamatan Maniis, Kabupaten Purwakarta, pada 3-5 November 2025, dengan sasaran Tenaga Pendidik. Metode kualitatif partisipatif digunakan, meliputi observasi, diskusi kelompok terfokus, dan analisis tematik. Hasil menunjukkan peningkatan pemahaman nilai Pancawaluya dari rata-rata 36% sebelum kegiatan menjadi 90% setelah intervensi. Seluruh guru merumuskan “Deklarasi Budaya Kerja Pancawaluya” sebagai komitmen kolektif untuk transparansi, kolaborasi, dan keteladanan. Temuan membuktikan bahwa pendekatan berbasis nilai lokal yang partisipatif efektif memperkuat integritas profesional dan dapat direplikasi di sekolah TdBA lain.
Digital Contract Disputes in the FinTech Era: Legal Analysis of Consumer Protection and the Obligations of the Parties Rusdi Sanmas; Markus Suryoutomo; Arliyanda Arliyanda; Johannes Triestanto; Iwan Rasiwan
International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol 5 No 5 (2026): IJHESS APRIL 2026
Publisher : CV. AFDIFAL MAJU BERKAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55227/ijhess.v5i5.2153

Abstract

The rapid development of the Financial Technology (FinTech) industry has significantly transformed the delivery of financial services, including the execution of contracts in electronic form. Digital contracts offer greater efficiency, transparency, and accessibility for the public. However, these practices also present complex legal challenges, particularly regarding consumer protection and the obligations of the parties involved. Many digital contracts still rely on standardized, one-sided clauses that may disadvantage consumers, while FinTech providers often limit their legal liability. Existing regulations, such as Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law) and Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection (UUPK), provide a normative legal framework to ensure the validity of digital contracts and safeguard consumer rights. Nevertheless, implementation in practice faces obstacles, including issues with verifying electronic signatures, clarity of contractual clauses, and the effectiveness of dispute resolution mechanisms. This study employs a normative juridical approach to analyze disputes in FinTech digital contracts in Indonesia, emphasizing the need for balance between the rights and obligations of all parties. The findings suggest a necessity for regulatory harmonization, improved legal and digital literacy among consumers, and the development of adaptive dispute resolution mechanisms, including faster and more efficient online dispute resolution alternatives. These efforts are expected to enhance legal certainty, foster consumer trust, and reduce the risk of disputes in the continually evolving FinTech landscape.
The Principle of Professionalism of the State Civil Apparatus in Public Service M. Riyanto; Ernesta Arita Ari; Johannes Triestanto; Iwan Rasiwan; Bambang Supriadi
International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol. 8 No. 1: Januari 2026
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/ijhess.v8i1.9238

Abstract

The professionalism of the State Civil Apparatus (Aparatur Sipil Negara/ASN) constitutes a fundamental principle in the implementation of public services that prioritize societal interests. ASN are not merely responsible for executing government policies, but also serve as the frontline actors in delivering public services that are effective, efficient, transparent, and equitable. This article aims to examine the principle of ASN professionalism in public service delivery in Indonesia, as well as the factors influencing it within the framework of bureaucratic reform and increasingly complex public demands. The research employs a qualitative approach using a literature review method, analyzing national scientific journals, statutory regulations, and other relevant literature related to ASN professionalism and public service. The findings indicate that ASN professionalism is not an isolated concept, but is shaped by several key factors, including human resource competence, ethical conduct and integrity of civil servants, the utilization of information technology in public services, and the implementation of a merit-based system in ASN management. Adequate competence enables civil servants to perform their duties optimally, while service ethics play a crucial role in fostering public trust. Furthermore, the adoption of digital technology has proven effective in enhancing service efficiency and transparency, whereas the merit system promotes objectivity and fairness in career development. The implications of this study highlight the necessity of continuously strengthening ASN professionalism through capacity building, ethical development, and adaptive bureaucratic reforms in response to contemporary challenges. Therefore, ASN professionalism serves as a vital foundation for achieving high-quality public services oriented toward public satisfaction.
Artificial Intelligence and Criminal Liability: New Challenges for Indonesian Criminal Law Ade Ari Gumilar; Zabidin; Rica Gusmarani; Makkah; Iwan Rasiwan
International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol. 8 No. 2: April 2026
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/ijhess.v8i2.10031

Abstract

The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has significantly transformed various aspects of human life, including the field of criminal law. AI technology is no longer limited to functioning as a supporting tool; it is increasingly capable of operating in a semi-autonomous or fully autonomous manner through machine learning systems. This development raises new legal challenges, particularly concerning criminal liability when AI systems are involved in actions that constitute criminal offenses. The primary issue lies in determining the appropriate legal subject to be held accountable, given that the Indonesian criminal law system remains predominantly centered on human actors (natural persons). This study aims to examine the challenges of criminal liability arising from the use of AI in Indonesia and to explore relevant legal concepts that may address these emerging issues. The research employs a normative juridical method, utilizing both statutory and conceptual approaches. The legal materials analyzed include legislation, scholarly publications, and prior studies related to AI and criminal law. The findings indicate that AI has not yet been recognized as a legal subject within the Indonesian legal framework, and therefore cannot be held criminally liable. As a result, liability is still attributed to human actors, including developers, users, and corporations that deploy AI technologies. Nevertheless, the increasing autonomy of AI systems calls for a re-evaluation and adaptation of existing criminal law doctrines to ensure legal certainty, fairness, and adequate protection for society in the digital era.
Perlindungan Hukum Investor Dalam Penanaman Modal Di Indonesia: The Phenomenon of Overlapping Regulations from the Perspective of Constitutional Law Johannes Triestanto; Lisda Apriliani Sobirin; Diana Pujiningsih; Zulfikri Pohan; Iwan Rasiwan
Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains Vol. 9 No. 2: Februari 2026
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/jks.v9i2.7348

Abstract

Perlindungan hukum investor merupakan elemen fundamental dalam menciptakan iklim penanaman modal yang kondusif, berkelanjutan, dan berdaya saing di Indonesia. Keberadaan jaminan hukum yang jelas dan konsisten tidak hanya berfungsi melindungi kepentingan investor, tetapi juga menjadi instrumen penting dalam mendorong pertumbuhan ekonomi nasional. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk perlindungan hukum yang diberikan kepada investor dalam kegiatan penanaman modal di Indonesia, baik bagi investor domestik maupun investor asing, serta mengkaji berbagai kendala yang muncul dalam implementasinya. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan menelaah peraturan perundang-undangan di bidang penanaman modal, khususnya Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanaman Modal, serta didukung oleh kajian literatur dari jurnal hukum nasional yang relevan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa secara normatif, sistem hukum Indonesia telah menyediakan kerangka perlindungan yang mencakup prinsip perlakuan yang sama, kepastian hukum, perlindungan terhadap hak kepemilikan, serta mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa investasi. Selain itu, pemerintah juga berupaya memperkuat iklim investasi melalui pembaruan regulasi dan penyederhanaan prosedur perizinan. Namun, dalam praktiknya, perlindungan hukum tersebut belum sepenuhnya berjalan optimal. Berbagai kendala seperti kompleksitas birokrasi, inkonsistensi kebijakan, serta lemahnya penegakan hukum masih menjadi faktor penghambat yang berpotensi menurunkan kepercayaan investor. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan penguatan implementasi hukum, harmonisasi regulasi, serta peningkatan kualitas lembaga pengawasan agar perlindungan hukum investor dapat terwujud secara efektif dan memberikan kepastian hukum yang berkelanjutan di Indonesia.
Pengaturan Living Law Dalam Kuhp Nasional: Antara Pengakuan Hukum Adat Dan Kepastian Hukum: Living Law Regulations in the National Criminal Code: Between Recognition of Customary Law and Legal Certainty Ernesta Arita Ari; Agus Sugiarto; Yuniantoro Sudrajad; Iwan Rasiwan; Johannes Triestanto
Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains Vol. 9 No. 1: Januari 2026
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/jks.v9i1.10124

Abstract

Konsep living law merepresentasikan keberadaan norma hukum yang berkembang dan dipatuhi secara nyata dalam kehidupan masyarakat Indonesia yang memiliki keragaman sosial dan budaya. Keberadaan norma tersebut memperoleh pengakuan normatif melalui pengaturan dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Nasional, yang membuka peluang bagi hukum adat untuk diintegrasikan ke dalam sistem hukum pidana positif. Pengakuan terhadap living law ini dimaksudkan sebagai upaya negara untuk mengakomodasi nilai-nilai lokal yang hidup di masyarakat, sekaligus memperkuat rasa keadilan substantif yang berakar pada realitas sosial. Meskipun demikian, pengaturan tersebut tidak terlepas dari berbagai perdebatan yuridis, terutama terkait dengan potensi benturan antara pengakuan hukum adat dan prinsip kepastian hukum yang menjadi pilar utama asas legalitas dalam hukum pidana. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan living law dalam KUHP Nasional dengan menitikberatkan pada landasan konseptual, tantangan implementatif, serta implikasinya terhadap asas legalitas dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia. Selain itu, kajian ini juga mengkaji sejauh mana mekanisme harmonisasi dapat dilakukan agar keberlakuan living law tidak menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum atau membuka ruang penyalahgunaan kewenangan dalam praktik penegakan hukum. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, yang didukung oleh analisis terhadap literatur dan jurnal hukum nasional yang relevan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa pengakuan living law dalam KUHP Nasional merupakan langkah progresif dalam merespons pluralisme hukum di Indonesia. Namun, tanpa batasan normatif yang jelas, pengaturan tersebut berpotensi menimbulkan problematika hukum, khususnya dalam menjamin kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan formulasi kebijakan yang lebih terukur dan harmonis agar integrasi living law dalam sistem hukum pidana nasional dapat berjalan secara adil, proporsional, dan konstitusional.
Co-Authors Ade Ari Gumilar Agus Sugiarto Ana Maria Gadi Djou Andika Adhyaksa Arliyanda Arliyanda Dafa’ Alifta Akbar Susilo Daffa Maulana Adha Herdatama Deny Deny Deny Diana Pujiningsih Eko Budi Sariyono Ernesta Arita Ari Gusmarani, Rica Isnaini, Atin Meriati Jeki Purnama Putra Johannes Triestanto Johannes Triestanto Lisda Apriliani Sobirin M Rizal Bagaskoro M. Riyanto Makkah Makkah HM Mardiman Mardiman Markus Suryoutomo Muhamad Iqbal Ansori Firdaus Muhammad Fachmi Muhammad Fathurrahman Nopiana Mozin Reski Mulia Rusdi Sanmas Rusli Jalil Supriadi, Bambang Taufik Taufik Tyan Tasa Wolter Junaedi Nurhamidin Yoga Nugraha Yulianis Safrinadiya Rahman Yuniantoro Sudrajad Zabidin Zulfikri Pohan Zulkarnain S