Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Ushuluddin Jurnal Studi Islam dan Sosial
Asep Ahmad Fathurrohman
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Manhaj al-Khas Kitab Tafsir At-Tahrir wa at-Tanwir karya Ibnu `Asyur Ali, Muhammad Hasan; Edi Komarudin; Asep Ahmad Fathurrohman
Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Agustus
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jpiu.46111

Abstract

Interpretation methods are generally divided into four types, namely tahlili, ijmali, muqaran, and maudhui. However, beyond these general methods, each interpreter, or mufasir, has their own unique perspective when interpreting the Quran, known as manhaj al-khash or the interpreter's special method. This research aims to discuss Ibn Ashur's manhaj al-khash in writing his exegesis, At-tahrir wa at-Tanwir. This study uses a qualitative research method based on literature review. The primary source in this research is Tafsir At-tahrir wa at-tanwir Juz 27, while the secondary sources refer to books, texts, and articles related to the research theme. The results of this study indicate that there are at least fifteen manhaj al-khash of Ibn Ashur in writing his exegesis, pertaining to the methods of using interpretation sources as well as the writing methods in his exegesis.
KOMPARASI TAFSIR AL-MANAR DAN TAFSIR AL-MARAGHI STUDI CORAK ADABI IJTIMA’I DALAM MERESPONS MODERNITAS Muhammad Nur Hidayat; Asep Ahmad Fathurrohman; Edi Komarudin
Lisyabab : Jurnal Studi Islam dan Sosial Vol 6 No 2 (2025): Lisyabab, Jurnal Studi Islam dan Sosial
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (LPPM) Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Mulia Astuti (STAIMAS) Wonogiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58326/jurnallisyabab.v6i2.467

Abstract

This study conducts a critical-comparative analysis of Tafsir Al-Manar and Tafsir Al-Maraghi, both of which share the Adabi Ijtima'i (Social-Cultural) style, to uncover the root cause of their differences ('illat al-ikhtilaf) in responding to modernity. Using a qualitative approach with the muqāranah (comparative) method and content analysis, this research examines methodological aspects and substantive interpretations of three key verses: Q.S. Yunus [10]: 100 (reason), Q.S. An-Nisa' [4]: 59 (politics), and Q.S. An-Nisa' [4]: 34 (family). The findings reveal that despite sharing a basic style, the two commentaries exhibit systematic divergence. Al-Manar, dominated by bil ra'yi (70%) and an Islahi-Siyasi (Reformist-Political) tendency, produces transformative and polemical responses. In contrast, Al-Maraghi, dominated by bil ma'tsur (60%) and a Tarbawi-Ilmi (Educational-Scientific) tendency, produces stabilizing-educative responses. This study concludes that the primary 'illat al-ikhtilaf lies in the interaction between the Tsaqofah al-Mufassirin (the intellectual-institutional framework of the exegetes) and their historical context. Al-Manar, a product of Salafi-Activist Tsaqofah in the Early Modern era, advocates for transformative-political tajdid (renewal). Meanwhile, Al-Maraghi, a product of Azhari-Institutional Tsaqofah in the Middle Modern era, advocates for stabilizing-educative tajdid. Thus, this study not only maps the differences but also contributes to the science of tafsir by introducing Tsaqofah al-Mufassirin as an analytical framework and two models of renewal (tajdid) born from the Adabi Ijtima'i style.
Co-Authors Muhammad Hasan Ali Muhammad Nur Hidayat R. Edi Komarudin