Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Negara Parlementer : Jurnal Studi Hukum Dan Administrasi Publik
Astri Anggraeni Putri
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Integrasi Prinsip Keadilan Restoratif dalam Proses Perdata: Sebuah Pendekatan Baru Penyelesaian Sengketa: Menawarkan Model Penyelesaian Sengketa Berbasis Pemulihan Hubungan Sosial Astri Anggraeni Putri; Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna
Parlementer : Jurnal Studi Hukum dan Administrasi Publik Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Desember : Parlementer : Jurnal Studi Hukum dan Administrasi Publik
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/parlementer.v2i4.1384

Abstract

Indonesia’s civil dispute resolution system remains dominated by an adversarial litigation model that prioritizes legal certainty but often neglects the relational and emotional dimensions underlying conflicts. Yet, in many cases such as family, inheritance, or neighborhood disputes the restoration of social relationships is as crucial as formal legal resolution. This study explores the potential integration of restorative justice principles into Indonesia’s civil procedural law as an alternative approach centered on dialogue, accountability, and reconciliation. Employing a normative-juridical approach and qualitative analysis of primary and secondary legal sources, the research finds that restorative justice values align not only with Indonesia’s living law traditions such as musyawarah (deliberative consensus) and customary dispute resolution but also with existing provisions in civil procedure codes. Accordingly, the study proposes the Structured Restorative Mediation (SRM) Model, a procedural framework that embeds restorative principles into both court-annexed and community-based mediation. This model prioritizes relational healing while upholding legal certainty and procedural fairness. Its successful implementation requires regulatory support, enhanced mediator training, and institutional strengthening of community-based dispute resolution bodies. Thus, integrating restorative justice is not merely an innovation but a structural necessity for a more humane, inclusive, and holistically just legal system.
Penerapan Pidana Percobaan dalam Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Sungai: Analisis Yuridis terhadap Putusan Nomor 168/Pid.B/LH/2023/PN Bls Farida Nurun Nazah; Galuh Candra Utami; Ahmad Jafar Sidik; Sekar Galuh Ardelia; Shifa Arifatunnisa; Astri Anggraeni Putri
Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): September: Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/birokrasi.v4i3.2775

Abstract

River contamination by the palm oil industry threatens the constitutional right to a healthy environment, creating a jurisprudential dilemma between ecological justice and socio-economic stability. District Court Decision No. 168/Pid.B/LH/2023/PN Bls, which imposed a probationary sentence on a corporate executive for river pollution, has sparked academic debate regarding the efficacy of non-custodial sanctions. This study examines the judge’s legal reasoning in applying probation and evaluates its juridical implications for environmental criminal law enforcement and river ecosystem protection. Employing a normative legal research methodology with statutory and case approaches, secondary data were analyzed qualitatively through deductive legal syllogism. The findings reveal that the ratio decidendi integrates three dimensions: the defendant’s subjective-personal circumstances, the principle of proportionality, and a restorative-sociological approach prioritizing ecological recovery and local economic continuity. Juridically, probation signifies a paradigm shift from retributive-punitive to restorative-reparative justice, yet risks undermining deterrence if decoupled from autonomous corporate liability and rigorous institutional oversight. It is concluded that probation constitutes a progressive instrument in environmental criminal law when applied selectively, supported by sustained monitoring mechanisms, and reinforced by a robust corporate accountability framework to ensure equilibrium between ecological restoration and legal certainty.
Co-Authors Ahmad Jafar Sidik Galuh Candra Utami Nazah, Farida Nurun Sekar Galuh Ardelia Shifa Arifatunnisa Wiraguna, Sidi Ahyar