Galuh Candra Utami
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pembuktian Digital dalam Sengketa Perdata: Menguji Validitas Formil dan Materiil Dokumen Elektronik di Era Modern Galuh Candra Utami; Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna
Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Desember : Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/referendum.v2i4.1360

Abstract

The rapid advancement of digital technology has fundamentally transformed civil legal interactions, making electronic documents such as instant messages, online transactions, and digital contracts primary forms of evidence in many civil disputes. However, their admissibility in judicial proceedings remains fraught with challenges concerning formal and material validity. This study aims to identify juridical and technical obstacles in digital evidence and to formulate an ideal model for civil procedural law that ensures reliable electronic proof. A normative-juridical approach with qualitative analysis was employed, combining doctrinal research through legislative review, jurisprudence, and scholarly literature with case studies of court decisions involving electronic evidence, particularly in divorce disputes. The findings reveal that inconsistent judicial treatment stems from the absence of specific procedural rules in Indonesia’s civil procedure framework still rooted in colonial-era HIR and RBg alongside limited digital infrastructure and low technological literacy among judicial actors. In response, the study proposes an integrated legal construction model featuring explicit provisions in the upcoming Civil Procedure Code, adoption of the functional equivalence principle, institutionalization of digital forensic experts in litigation, and procedural safeguards for vulnerable parties. The research concludes that only through holistic reform of the evidentiary paradigm can Indonesia’s civil justice system guarantee fairness, legal certainty, and relevance in the digital era.
Analisis Putusan 457/Pdt.G/2020/PTA.Sby: Perlindungan Hak Waris Berdasar KUHPerdata dan KHI Intan Nazili; Delvi Eka Ariyanti; Galuh Candra Utami; Zahra Ramadhanty Drajat; Kamilah, Talitha; Astri Anggraeni Putri; Ismaya Rahailia Nasution
Journal Sovereignty Law And Diplomatic Politics Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Journal Sovereignty Law and Diplomatic Politics
Publisher : CV Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jlsdp.v2i1.1983

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertimbangan majelis hakim dalam Putusan Nomor 457/Pdt.G/2020/PTA.Sby terkait keabsahan hibah yang ditinjau dari Pasal 1321 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata) dan Pasal 210 ayat (1) Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI). Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa majelis hakim cenderung menerapkan pendekatan yuridis-formalistis dengan menitikberatkan pada kekuatan pembuktian akta otentik dan tanda tangan persetujuan ahli waris sebagai bukti tidak adanya cacat kehendak. Dalam penerapan Pasal 210 ayat (1) KHI, hakim menilai batas maksimal hibah berdasarkan aspek kuantitatif luas objek hibah tanpa melakukan penilaian komprehensif terhadap nilai ekonomis keseluruhan harta pemberi hibah. Pendekatan tersebut berpotensi mengabaikan tujuan normatif Pasal 210 ayat (1) KHI sebagai norma pembatas yang berfungsi melindungi hak ahli waris. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan penerapan prinsip kehati-hatian dan keadilan substantif dalam menilai keabsahan hibah.