Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PERAN HUKUM PERIZINAN DALAM PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN PRODUK KOSMETIK ILEGAL Martono, Yacob Ferdinan; Prayoga, Sidik Dika; Uswatun, Umi; Maulina, Shinta; K, Feby Resta Ayu
GOVERNANCE: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Politik Lokal dan Pembangunan Vol. 13 No. 1 (2026): 2026 Januari
Publisher : Lembaga Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Politik (LKISPOL)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56015/gjikplp.v13i1.620

Abstract

Perkembangan industri kosmetik di Indonesia diiringi meningkatnya peredaran produk kosmetik ilegal dan tanpa izin edar, terutama melalui e-commerce. Kondisi ini menimbulkan risiko kesehatan bagi konsumen karena banyak produk mengandung bahan berbahaya dan tidak melalui evaluasi BPOM. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan hukum perizinan kosmetik, peran perizinan dalam menjamin keamanan produk, serta upaya penegakan hukum terhadap pelaku usaha yang menjual kosmetik tanpa izin edar. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sistem notifikasi BPOM berperan penting sebagai instrumen pengawasan keamanan, mutu, dan manfaat produk. Namun, lemahnya literasi konsumen, tingginya permintaan produk murah, serta pengawasan digital yang belum optimal menyebabkan maraknya kosmetik ilegal. Peningkatan edukasi, penguatan pengawasan, dan penegakan hukum yang konsisten diperlukan untuk melindungi konsumen.
IMPLEMENTATION OF SUPREME COURT REGULATION NUMBER 2 OF 2015 JUNCTO SUPREME COURT REGULATION NUMBER 4 OF 2019 CONCERNING PROCEDURES FOR SETTLEMENT OF SIMPLE LAWSUITS REGARDING THE TIME LIMIT FOR SETTLEMENT OF SIMPLE LAWSUITS IN THE PALANGKA RAYA DISTRICT COURT Nugraha, Muhammad Dafi; Martono, Yacob Ferdinan; Evi; Theresia, Louise
International Journal of Cultural and Social Science Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): International Journal of Cultural and Social Science
Publisher : Pena Cendekia Insani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53806/ijcss.v7i2.1366

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze the implementation of the deadline for resolving simple lawsuits based on Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No. 2 of 2015 juncto Perma No. 4 of 2019 concerning the Procedure for Resolving Simple Lawsuits at the Palangka Raya District Court and to identify the factors causing the deadline to be exceeded. This research adopts an empirical legal method with a descriptive qualitative approach thru interviews and case data analysis using the Case Tracking Information System (SIPP). The research results show that the majority of simple lawsuits are not resolved within the 25 working days timeframe, with some cases even lasting up to 618 days. The delays are caused by the absence of the parties, the low level of legal understanding in society, the lack of good faith from the defendant, administrative obstacles, and the absence of sanctions for exceeding the deadline. This condition indicates a gap between norms and practices, so the goal of a simple lawsuit as a mechanism for quick, simple, and low-cost dispute resolution has not yet been fully realized.